Global warming question for both sides....

quote:

---

Every time I hear an event happening, freezing, a flood, a drought, etc

---

if you're hearing about a single event like that in reference to climate change theory, from either side, you should ignore it as irrelevant to the debate. they're either stupid or trolling the other side

Greenland...was named 'Green Land'...for a reason, GO. Now what caused warmer temps back then, or whether man's effect re GH gases now...has less to do with Science than it does (Authoritarian Socialist) Politics.

Back in the Hippie Days, when I was in the groove ...it was the Commies that were pushing the Global Cooling meme. Same now.

And even if it's man's oil-based technology that is raising GH gases...we are going to need a vibrant economy to make the next technological leap to a more 'Green'-based civilization.

Of course, populations are key. We'll likely get a major die off from war, viral plague or the fast-rising impotence of anti-biotics. GW will be a moot issue.

Now if one wants to talk respect, and reverence for 'mother earth'...or the Principle of Beauty as such affects societal health of our species...that's a whole nother animal. And probably far more productive that the scaremonger/sky is falling meme of the Authoritarian Left.

This fricking thread

quote:

---

SO my question is, what was the cause of the event in the past? Or Dems arguing that the climate change is actually a "returning to past" climate change? All of these events have a history of happening in the past. So why is today considered "change".

---

Whoa.

That's deeply vague.