- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Federal Judge rules Kentucky must recognize gay marriages from other states
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:44 pm
Also, a suit was filed challenging Louisiana's ban, mostly due to the state law requiring federal and state tax returns to mirror each other. A gay married couple must either lie to the federal government on their tax returns or violate state law.
Saw this coming after the Supreme Court rulings. Federal recognition coupled with some state recognition creates a huge disparity in those states that wont recognize the other states marriages.
Kentucky Judge ruling
Louisiana challenge
Saw this coming after the Supreme Court rulings. Federal recognition coupled with some state recognition creates a huge disparity in those states that wont recognize the other states marriages.
Kentucky Judge ruling
Louisiana challenge
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:45 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Um.
Dude.
Board protocol gives Toddy dibs.
You should know this by now...
Dude.
Board protocol gives Toddy dibs.
You should know this by now...


Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:46 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Then, someone from a state banning gay marriage will file suit and then U.S. Supreme Court, based on their previous precedent, will force the state to recognize and affirm all gay marriage in all 50 states. Actually, those suits have already been filed. It is just a matter of time. 2-3 years at the most.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:46 pm to Lsupimp
14th amendment is abused like no other these days.
It's ridiculous. Judges twist it to make it mean whatever they want.
Sad
It's ridiculous. Judges twist it to make it mean whatever they want.
Sad
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:46 pm to Mickey Goldmill
They might as well just go to the Archives and take the Constitution out of there.
I don't care about gay marriage, but with the shear volume of Federal selective enforcement of state laws as of late, we've completely lost sight of the point of the document.
I don't care about gay marriage, but with the shear volume of Federal selective enforcement of state laws as of late, we've completely lost sight of the point of the document.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:50 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Fed judge telling a state that the 10th doesn't mean shite anymore, actually he meant to say the whole document is toilet paper now. A two term amendment on Presidents is the next one to go up in a blaze.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:56 pm to goldennugget
quote:
14th amendment is abused like no other these days.
It's ridiculous. Judges twist it to make it mean whatever they want.
Sad
Nothing is twisted. Theres is now a full faith and credit clause argument to be made since the Supreme Courts ruling. Every federal judge that has heard these cases since the SC ruling has ruled the same way. It should be noted, the judge in Kentucky was appointed by George H.W. Bush on the recommendation of Republican Senator Mitch McConnell.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:58 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
George H.W. Bush on the recommendation of Republican Senator Mitch McConnell.
2 RINOs
Awesome
But you can not make an argument that the 14th amendment was meant to have this kind of influence and scope. Judicial activism at its finest
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:58 pm to lsuroadie
Basically the 14th amendment has been used time and time again to nullify the 10th amendment.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 2:59 pm to lsuroadie
quote:
meanwhile....
Why post that? Just because this issue is something I care about doesn't mean I am not concerned with the unsustainable spending that the federal government is doing.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:00 pm to lsuroadie
quote:
meanwhile....
You are right. That graph with all those numbers is gay.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:01 pm to goldennugget

You can't treat a certain group of citizens differently without proving a substantial state interest being involved.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:01 pm to Mickey Goldmill
I wish we could just go ahead and pass the gay thing already. We have some more important things for our court system to be working on.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:05 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Why do we even waste our time to vote when the majority of people can be so easily overridden by one to nine judges?
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:06 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Interesting because DOMA Section 2 was not found unconstitutional.
That is still the law of the land and constitutional per the Supreme Court.
quote:
No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
That is still the law of the land and constitutional per the Supreme Court.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:19 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
You can't treat a certain group of citizens differently without proving a substantial state interest being involved.
When did marriage become a right?
Edit: Let me preface that by saying I don't care if gays can get married. I do care that the Federal Government continues to overstep its authority by telling states which laws they have to enforce.
This post was edited on 2/12/14 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:30 pm to elprez00
The tyranny of the majority is almost at it's end.


Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:41 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Federal Judge rules Kentucky must recognize gay marriages from other states
Too bad their is this thing called states rights. I see this being overturned.
Posted on 2/12/14 at 3:43 pm to asurob1
quote:
The tyranny of the majority is almost at it's end.
This statement irritates me. Especially when its applied incorrectly.
Popular
Back to top
