Started By
Message

re: Liberal dems.. is the core of your beliefs that you want to make life more fair?

Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:02 pm to
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

How many public school and Head Start opposition instances do I have to cite?

Or student loan programs, or education grants, etc., for that matter.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34990 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Good, and not unexpected... I merely wanted to isolate the exact opposition to what I claimed.


Its less of an opposition and more of a correction on what you define as "entitled". You are not entitled to anyone else's production.

quote:

Now I say that this COUNTRY has afforded YOU an opportunity and assisted you in your quest for food. Is that not true?


A. You can stop using caps to dramatize your statement. Just say what you want to say.

b. Not necessarily, but I will humor you and say yes, so I can let you get to wear you are trying to go with this.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124477 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Or student loan programs, or education grants, etc., for that matter.
Or voucher opportunities shut down?
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

You are not entitled to anyone else's production.

Oh, really? Show me the empirical evidence... the formula you use... that you have paid your fair share for police protection, roads, bridges, public parks, military protection, etc.
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:05 pm to
quote:


Or student loan programs
A freaking catastrophe of immense proportions at this point. Driven up the cost of college among myriad other frick ups.

Hell. They'd have been better off and probably saved money just to create some regional free federal universities that allowed students who coudn't afford other colleges.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34990 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Oh, really? Show me the empirical evidence... the formula you use... that you have paid your fair share for police protection, roads, bridges, public parks, military protection, etc.


What about any of that am I entitled to? You think we are entitled to public parks? I could stretch military and policy protection through individual rights If I really wanted to, but are you really going to try and argue we are all entitled to bridges?
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 4:09 pm
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Oh, really? Show me the empirical evidence... the formula you use... that you have paid your fair share for police protection, roads, bridges, public parks, military protection, etc.



The govt giving something to someone without asking for their "fair share"(whatever that is defined as) doesn't mean they were "entitled" to it anymore than me giving my neighbor money means he was entitled to it.

And, "entitled" is sort of a personal feeling. IE, one feels "entitled". I say that any person who feels absolutely entitled to the production of someone else is a severely immoral person. I'm pretty sure we had a whole class of people in the south some years ago who felt personally entitled to the production of others. Thought we'd all agreed that wasn't a very good thing.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34990 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:12 pm to
Exactly. The only things I feel entitled to, are the things I produce for myself.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Gay marriage?

What about it?
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

but are you really going to try and argue we are all entitled to bridges?

Of course we're entitled to bridges, but according to your own logic YOU'RE not entitled to use one unless you build it or pay for it all by yourself.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34990 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

YOU'RE not entitled to use one unless you build it or pay for it all by yourself.


Explain to me how you are entitled to using some bridge. Not how you have the ability to use it. How are you entitled to it?

We are all able to use bridges because they have been provided to us by tax payers before us. That doesn't mean we are entitled to them.

I have access to a tax deduction if I am married, but at no means am I entitled to that deduction. Just because it exists, doesn't mean one is entitled to it.
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 4:18 pm
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Of course we're entitled to bridges, but according to your own logic YOU'RE not entitled to use one unless you build it or pay for it all by yourself.

Making use of something that is there =/= feeling like one was entitled to its production in the first place.

Oh. And no, it is fricking moronic to say we are "entitled" to bridges. If we were, then quite obviously, every bridge that any person or group of people wants MUST be build. And, quite clearly, you aren't asserting that.
Posted by Tim
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
7060 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Of course we're entitled to bridges




You are a dumbass
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:20 pm to
Here's a challenge for you: go stand in front of a car at the Crescent City Connection and tell the driver he's not entitled to use the bridge.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34990 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:21 pm to
Again, how is he entitled to use the bridge?


If the bridge is closed, are his rights being infringed?
Posted by Tim
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
7060 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:22 pm to
And if Person A doesn't have a car, he is entitled to one. After all, it's only fair, he is entitled to the use of the bridge!
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Again, how is he entitled to use the bridge?


If the bridge is closed, are his rights being infringed?


Don't waste your time trying to engage in an honest dialogue with Rex.

He's a classic sophist.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Oh. And no, it is fricking moronic to say we are "entitled" to bridges. If we were, then quite obviously, every bridge that any person or group of people wants MUST be build.

No... it means that if their well-being depends on it and if society can provide it then it SHOULD be built.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124477 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Oh, really? Show me the empirical evidence... the formula you use... that you have paid your fair share for police protection, roads, bridges, public parks, military protection, etc.
You mean for example, the fact some of us pay more tax annually than than most Americans pay in a lifetime. That kind of empirical evidence?
Posted by tigress77
BR
Member since Sep 2013
322 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Can one of you explain why my statement is wrong and explain what is the core of your beliefs?



It really isn't possible for a Liberal if asked to post their essential beliefs on substantive important questions in a reasonable, logical progression is possible because there is NO logical cohesion to their views.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram