Started By
Message

re: Why not utilize more of a 3 step drop back?

Posted on 12/16/13 at 2:35 pm to
Posted by 5Alive
With Your Moms
Member since Jul 2009
7662 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 2:35 pm to
Y not run the fricking ball
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30223 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Y not run the fricking ball


Our offensive line is worse at run blocking than they are at pass blocking....which is a scary thought.

Our receivers are great because of Brees. Without Brees, they are average at best. Graham is the only one with star talent.

Fun drinking game: Every time a Saints Wide receiver catches a pass, and immediately (intentionally) falls to the turf or steps out of bounds, take a shot. You'll be drunk by the middle of the first drive, unless of course Brees throws an INT on the first pass.

I keed I keed

But seriously, our receivers aren't very physical and can't create consistent separation. Pair that with an O-Line that can't block, and you get games like yesterday and the one against Seattle.

ETA: Saints leading receivers as it pertains to receptions

1) Jimmy Graham (76)
2) Pierre Thomas (71)
3) Darren Sproles (66)
4) Marques Colston (64)
5) Lance Moore (30)

Your top 3 receivers are a tight end and two running backs. We always talk about how it would be stupid to draft more offensive weapons, but I'd be inclined to say we are in need of a #1, tough, physical receiver that can create separation on his own without having to be "thrown open".
This post was edited on 12/16/13 at 3:04 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram