re: Why are the Astros so awful?

quote:

---

If you want to see what new owners who actually want to win do, check out what Mark Anastasio did with the Brewers. He actually spent money and guess what, the team became a lot more competitive immediately and the farm system wasn't hurt by it.



Astros 27-45

Brewers 28-41


This is why you shouldn't talk shite when you've been a fan of team for two days and know very little about the sport.

---

quote:

---

Astros 27-45

Brewers 28-41

---

I've been waiting for this bump.

Don't forget to point out -- the Mets $100 million dollar payroll has them sitting at a record of 27 - 40.

The Dodger's $239 Million opening day payroll has them sitting at the spectacular record of 29 -39. Seriously, for $200 million dollars, you can only get 2 more wins than the terrible Astros?? That 29 - 39 record is the same that the White Sox are spending close to $120 million to achieve.

Yes, the Astros are bad. They are achieving "Bad" status with a embarrassing low payroll and among the youngest line up in the majors.

So, what does that make the Dodgers, Brewers, White Sox, and Mets?