Started By
Message
locked post

The Reason for Keeping Eric Gordon

Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:04 pm
Posted by Zoombop
Westbank
Member since Feb 2013
987 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:04 pm
For much of the season, I was on the 'Trade Eric Gordon' Train. His injury issues mixed with his personality (or lack thereof) and his bloated contract made me sick to my stomach. I was glued to my computer screen around the trade deadline hoping for some movement, any movement, but, alas, Gordon remained a Hornet. He proceeded to sit out back-to-backs, miss a lot of shots, disappear in the second half of games, and even have a bad attitude (spat with Coach Williams in Utah). The Hornets lost 55 games. Like every fan, I had a sick feeling in my stomach, wondering if this "re-build" was going to work out, or if we were just fooling ourselves. Now that the season has been over for a few weeks, I've had some time to reflect, and I've been able to see some light at the end of the tunnel concerning Eric Gordon and the future of this team. So, I've made a list of reasons to keep Mr. Gordon:

1) He's a veteran

This is an extremely young basketball team. In fact, it was the second youngest in the NBA this season. Roger Mason was the oldest player at 32, followed by Greivis Vasquez at... 26. This fact of youth should not be understated. Anthony Davis, Austin Rivers, Brian Roberts, Robin Lopez, and even Ryan Anderson and Al-Farouq Aminu, to an extent, had never played meaningful minutes of NBA basketball. Playing well in college or playing well in a deep reserve role doesn't mean a whole lot. Eric Gordon is a veteran compared to these guys. He had to deal with being traded, playing through injury, missing time due to injury, and shouldering the load offensively and defensively. He's also had to deal with trying to uphold a title he was never really cut out for as the "Cornerstone" of the franchise. He brings a lot to the position and team that rookies or second/third-year players cannot in terms of experience and, as I'll explain in a moment, ability.

2) His ability

A lot has been made of Eric Gordon's potential. He's been talked up as a potential top-3 shooting guard for a few seasons now, only to disappoint after succumbing to injuries. It's time to get rid of those expectations and just accept him for what he is right now and be content with that. Right now, he is an undersized 2 guard with a great ability to drive the lane, solid defense and athleticism, and about 18-20 ppg when healthy. He's best suited to be a second option on a championship caliber team. Expecting him to become much more than that is unfair because most players don't even get to his level. Considering his ability to contribute when healthy and not the first option, it makes his contract really easy to swallow, however, those two things are not likely, and cause many to believe his contract in completely unbearable. Which leads me to explain why...

3) ...his contract is not completely unbearable

Believe it or not, the Pelicans are in a great position to sign a maximum salary player this coming season. They are also in position to do so the following season should they miss out on someone they like a lot. Gordon is slated to make about $14 million going into the second year of his 4 year deal. Looking at his inability to stay on the court, it's fair to assume he's not worth the amount of money he's getting paid. The truth of the matter, though, is that most deals in the NBA aren't as sweet as Ryan Anderson's or Robin Lopez's. It's a bit of a crapshoot when trying to figure out whether or not to pay a guy, and very seldom do teams and agents place the same reasonable value on their player. Look at other contracts around the league. Ben Gordon, Charlie Villanueva, Joe Johnson, Gerald Wallace, Kris Humphries, Amar'e Stoudemire, Rudy Gay (in my opinion), and Nene are all on worse contracts than Eric Gordon any way you flip it. What's more, is that even by playing half of the season, he was more productive and effective than all of them besides maybe Johnson. At his current production/contribution, a fair value for Gordon is probably at about $9 million a year. Overpaying by $5 million annually is far better than you can say for any of the players on that list above.

In the end, Eric Gordon may be traded anyway, for what package I cannot say, but based on these reasons above, I think it may be in the best interest of the Pelicans to keep him around. My main argument stems from the belief that this team is no longer looking to get younger, rather, they prefer to get older and more experienced. The foundation is set with Anthony Davis, but keeping Eric Gordon will make this project a lot easier to put together. All we need is another certain maximum salary point guard...
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25320 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:08 pm to
TLDR, ship his mopey arse out of here.
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:12 pm to
Oh goodness........

This post was edited on 5/6/13 at 6:17 pm
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

1) He's a veteran

He hasn't played a full season in his career since his rookie year
quote:

2) His ability

I've yet to see him produce fully given his ability
quote:

3) ...his contract is not completely unbearable

Just because we aren't paying anyone else money and have some to spend doesn't mean that we aren't completely overpaying for him
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72112 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:34 pm to
Didn't read but I wanted to trade him and now that the season is over I moved to the "wait and see" approach.

I think a fresh slate in 2014, along with some more talent as well as AD +1 year older will hopefully be all Gordon needs to be that 20ppg player we traded for
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71978 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

1) He's a veteran

If Eric is the leader of this team Lord help us.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116972 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

The Reason for Keeping Eric Gordon


1) we can't trade him at this point for anything worth a crap.

2) see 1.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9871 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 7:52 pm to
I hate this debate because Gordon backers also use the same circular logic that comes back to, you can't trade Gordon. It's either, he has been hurt and has no trade value. Or, once he's healthy he's too good to let go. So the team just has to keep holding onto to him and hope he gets better. I just can't accept that. If a bunch of guys on a message board can understand his potential value, then so can other NBA GMs.

It's no secret, I hate Gordon. He's overpaid, made of glass, sullen, pudgy and over rated. I can't stand to watch him play and I hate having him on this team. I would have never traded for him, would have let him go to Phx for nothing and would trade him now for a late 1st. The team is better without him...
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 5/7/13 at 3:15 am to
Great post

I agree with everything
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/7/13 at 8:00 am to
Great read.

Not opposed to dealing Gordon, but you make very good points for keeping him.

If I may add one more- the guy has been in a funk for 2 years. His team swore they wouldnt trade him; they did. He gets to NO, is then hurt, and cant play any more. He sees the team draft a lottery sg. He is told by management he needs to see what his FA market is. Is then called out for his injury by his head coach (Has Thibodeaux said anything about Rose?)

Has he been a bit ridiculous in how he handled some of these things? Absolutely. But you have to think (hope) he is ready to move on and get back to playing good basketball.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 5/7/13 at 9:41 am to



































































^ that's all of them
Posted by titleist71
Member since Oct 2012
459 posts
Posted on 5/7/13 at 10:55 am to
brian roberts is 27
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24849 posts
Posted on 5/7/13 at 7:28 pm to
The only way I can see us keeping him is if we land CP3 and that isn't gonna happen.

If we landed CP3 and another solid piece in the draft, this team would be sick. Since that isn't gonna happen, ship his mopey arse out of here seems to be the best option.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram