Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Saints big board photo...

Posted on 4/27/13 at 11:00 am
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49489 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 11:00 am
stolen from SR. Looks like:
3. Joekel
4. Warmack
5. Jordan
6. Johnson
7. Richardson
8. Cooper
9. Ansah
10. Mingo
11. Star
12. Austin
13. Eifert
14. Hayden

23. Teo
24. Pugh
25. B. Warner
26. D. Jones
27. E. Reid
28. C. Patterson
29. Trufant
30.
31. Nassib
32. Barkley

Posted by jembeurt
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
8804 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 11:52 am to
Thats pretty interesting. I can't see if that is Vaccaro at 15.

Also, I wonder if they make a move to get Nassib since he is so high on their board?
Posted by yurintroubl
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
30162 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 11:58 am to
quote:


Also, I wonder if they make a move to get Nassib since he is so high on their board?




Posted by jembeurt
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
8804 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 12:02 pm to
Sorry. I've been cooking and I just checked and saw he was selected.
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
23028 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

32. Barkley


Why rank him at 32 if you're not going to take him at 80?
Posted by memphstigers23
Fenway Pahk
Member since Mar 2012
10278 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

23. Teo

Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71554 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 12:37 pm to
So Star was the pick if Carolina didn't frick it up?
Posted by xxKylexx
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2011
4039 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 12:57 pm to
I don't think the Saints expected Terron Armstead (and Johnathan Jenkins for that matter) to fall. We had to go for need there and something tells me the Saints really did want to take Barkley haha.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278257 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

So Star was the pick if Carolina didn't frick it up?




well they passed on Eifert, who was higher. So im not sure.

not even sure if that is their big board.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Why rank him at 32 if you're not going to take him at 80?
It's also about need. We have much greater needs elsewhere outside of backup QB.

Now if the top QBs fell to the 5th-6th round they'd take a long look.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

So Star was the pick if Carolina didn't frick it up?
No, it's also about need. It's possible they could have grabbed him, but if they have 5 guys rated similar they are going with the higher need. Safety was the highest need outside of LT.

Same thing with the OGs. If one had fell to use they would have had to have a much much higher grade than our needs.

Then again, that may not be our ranking board. It could have been our projection board(sure looks more like a mock draft w/ trades than a ranking board). So this could all be moot.
This post was edited on 4/27/13 at 1:07 pm
Posted by 504Voodoo
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2012
13531 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

23. Teo


Well that was a little too close for comfort.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8325 posts
Posted on 4/27/13 at 1:45 pm to
Damn, I wonder if we had Vaccaro rated number 1 or 2? The only people not on that list who were drafted ahead of our spot were Fisher, Vaccaro, Milliner, and Fluker. I'm sure Fisher had one of the top spots, but I could see the Saints having Vaccaro above Fluker and Milliner.

If this is truly their board, it would make sense that Vaccaro would be in the 2 spot, else Eifert would've been rated higher and he was available at our selection.

If so, either this team thinks extremely highly of Vaccaro, or extremely lowly of the guys we currently have.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram