Started By
Message

re: Why hasn't LSU ever claimed the 1908 NCAA football championship?

Posted on 4/14/13 at 7:58 pm to
Posted by tigerswin03
SAINTS / PELICANS FAN
Member since Jan 2009
4715 posts
Posted on 4/14/13 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

There was a big scandal that year. A player was accused of accepting a horse to play. Lsu was ruled inelligable.
i remember reading about this in an article in the times pic a few years back.....from what i remember in the article the team had brought in a few ringers that was not eligible....back then you didnt have as many rules and if it were by todays ncaa it was bad enough to get the death penalty..
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3477 posts
Posted on 4/14/13 at 8:01 pm to
omegaman66 this I can agree with, national championships should be call Before the BCS and After the BCS.

Really the AP poll is a joke for the most part, because of the way games were played and a very Northern bias.
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3477 posts
Posted on 4/14/13 at 8:06 pm to
Not a horse, a player (Martin Lally) gave his check to sing at a theater to another person to sing for him while he went to play baseball.


That is all. He was cleared in the end, because everyone would have had to been banned otherwise, as all school were allowed to let their players play baseball for the same amount.
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16357 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 4:49 am to
Give that title to Bama to. They need it.
Posted by louisiana dude
Member since Jan 2010
47 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 9:01 am to
Interesting LSU tidbit. In 1906, the forward pass was introduced in college football. The forward pass was used for the first time at LSU in the season opener against the Monroe Athletic Club(no shite). In the first period,Muller of LSU received a punt, and instead of running,threw a well-executed pass to Handy , for a "neat gain" and LSU's first forward pass.
Posted by TheDeathValley
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2010
17654 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Wingard can be credited with inventing the now-illegal tear away jersey, as he would soak Fenton's woolen game shirts in a mild acid solution to weaken the fabric before each game.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34157 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 10:18 am to
quote:

LSU has it's Penn. 5 plus the Michigan 2 to go along with 1 Louisiana player that played in Penn for a number of years.

The other problem is he doesn't know the speed of the game in the east, one of the fastest players in the East became our coach in 1909 and he was not near as fast as Lally or Doc.

Siep would have been an all star in the east with Doc.

I know the players on all the eastern schools and the Southern schools.

Here is a little fun fact that writer has no clue about, LSU played the Yale, Havard All Star with the best end in the nation from Vandy on their team and tied them 0-0 and that was without the Smith Brothers, Seip or Lally.

SO much for his writing about the power of eastern football.


None of this changes the fact that LSU played one good team all year (Auburn) which wasn't nearly as good as Penn or Harvard or Chicago.

Fact is that LSU played a WEAK schedule.

Again, 1908 LSU is like 2009 Boise State. Do you think Boise State should share the 2009 championship with Alabama?

No, of course not.
This post was edited on 4/15/13 at 10:20 am
Posted by GM19
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2010
795 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 11:32 am to
A lot of Alabama references in here. But in all seriousness, I do think the whole 1920's national championships are kind of tacky, but once you claim it, it's kind of hard to unclaim them.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25526 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 11:33 am to
Bama already claims 4 national titles for the 1908 season.
Posted by ttigermike
Member since Dec 2003
66 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 11:35 am to
i have an lsu pennant from late fifties.
on the pennant it has:

national champions with a tiger and football.
below it has "1908 and 1958"
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
74230 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 11:37 am to
Because we don't want to be like the Gumps.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34157 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

GM19


Well the argument that the NC didn't exist before 1936 is more or less accurate. However, people most certainly DID have clear ideas about which team was the best at the end of each season, and eventually the press started naming "champions" on their own. This was problematic, of course, because different prominent newspapers in different regions would name different teams. In an era when cross-regional play was rare, this meant that you had 3-4 "champs" each year (hence, LSU's "Champions of the South" banner from 1908).

The AP was supposed to solve this problem, and coincided with the use of opinion polling in politics (rise of Gallup poll, etc) as the AP was simply a poll of sportswriters.
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 2:55 pm to
The whole "we're not Alabama" explanation doesn't hold water IMHO. If LSU has a legit claim to the 1908 title they would in no way be diminishing the university to make such a claim.
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3477 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 3:02 pm to
TxTiger82

Just to fix some of your miss gulded thoughts:

John W. Mayhew was an All American in track and field and 1st team AA in football in 1906 and 2nd team in 1908, he was one of the top 2-3 fastest players in Northeastern football. Lally and Doc beat him with ease in footraces. C. Smith was likely just as fast as John at 28 years old, but we will never know that for sure.

E.T. McDonald was a All American out of Colgate, that would not have started LSU. Both McDonald and Mayhew coach LSU between 1909 and 1916 both were know as fast players in eastern football, and Doc was still faster than both.

Siep broke his shoulder at Susquehanna University before transferring to LSU, even playing hurt much of 07-09 he was still likely the best offensive end in America.

What made LSU in 1908 is it's core backfield Doc, Lally, C. Smith and V. Smith. V. Smith was normally the crash blocker at the line, Lally would try to block the next man and C. Smith was the person Doc would put his hand on his shoulder as they rounded the line. Once in the open field Doc would take off.

On the Line LSU had 3 strong players in Thomas, Hillman and Gandy. Thomas was the best overall lineman, he played in Penn. Hillman was the quickest of the linemen. Gandy was the Capt of the team and the enforcer of the team (do you know what that is?) and the hardest hitting.

The largest lineman was Norblett, he was a huge linemen at the time at 220 lbs. LSU would normally run to his side of the ball with the backs stacked behind him.

The other line was the Jr. R. L. Stovall who could be called the rock of the line. He was a rough player who was always in the scrum.

At the other End was a split between Gill and R.F. Stovall. Gill was normally the player passed to on end around throw back routes.

What made LSU good was Fenton ability to throw on the run as well as kick on the run. Doc at a time when an incomplete pass was a 15 yard penalty., was better than an 80% thrower and this with a larger and rounder ball than todays game.


Eastern football on average tired 1 pass or less a game, LSU like Carlisle is over 4 a game. LSU wins the Auburn game by throwing the ball. This is long before Notre Dame beat Army by it's passing game.

LSU schedule is only as weak as it appears due to Alabama, Michigan, Tulane, Texas, Washington, Vanderbilt and Sewanee all not wanting to play the loaded LSU team. Many teams played LSU in 1907 that would not in 1908, and the coach for Tulane warned Yost,and McGugin not to play LSU.

The best play of the 1908 season by any team comes in the LSU vs Arkansas game.


As I posted before the game between LSU and Harvard-Yale All Star team, LSU ties them 0-0 without Lally, Siep or C. Smith. The Yale-Harvard team core group is made of 5 All Americans.

And as I post so much for the power east football, because when they came South they had to pass vs our line and failed.
This post was edited on 4/15/13 at 3:06 pm
Posted by Deltatiger
hernando, ms
Member since Aug 2005
598 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 3:38 pm to


But to the school's credit, they do not claim this "national championship." Alabama would already have made the banners and rings by now if it were them.
This post was edited on 4/15/13 at 4:01 pm
Posted by Flame Salamander
Texas Gulf - Clear Lake
Member since Jan 2012
3044 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

1908 was a great year. Industrial revolution. Invention of airplanes and cars. WW I was still a ways off. Ah, those were the days.


Yes, the Gay 90's were nothing but a distant memory.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
32673 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 4:04 pm to
So much fail, of course it could just be sarcasm but

quote:

1908 was a great year. Industrial revolution.

1840 -1870

quote:

Invention of airplanes


1903

quote:

and cars


Steam powered vehicles as early as 1769 Gasoline powered vehicles by both Daimler and Benz in the mid to late 1880's

Sorry, my engineering OCD kicked in.
This post was edited on 4/15/13 at 4:14 pm
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 4:07 pm to
I would except a 2011 NC. We were undefeated, sec champs and defeated the eventual NC's
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41779 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

None of this changes the fact that LSU played one good team all year (Auburn) which wasn't nearly as good as Penn or Harvard or Chicago.


Auburn was selected in the preseason as the best team in the country. They outscored their opponents that year 158-10, including beating UGA & Ga Tech by a combined score of 67-0. Every point scored on Auburn that year was by LSU.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22868 posts
Posted on 4/15/13 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

this meant that you had 3-4 "champs" each year
quote:

this meant that you had 3-4 "champs" each year


All appointed champs by organizations that did not have authority to do so.

At best those pre-bcs champions are "probably should have been champions".

If I play you in rock paper scissors and I win the first game but you win the second. I can claim the championship and you might as well. But since we didn't agree before hand to set up a method for determining the champion there can not be a champion.

Until all the Div-1 colleges agreed to set up a Div-1 championship system there was no championship. People OUTSIDE of the NCAA can not dictate anything to the NCAA. Just like you don't have authority to determine the NCAA National Champion.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram