- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So Bridgewater to be a tiger?
Posted on 4/11/13 at 7:32 pm to thunderbird1100
Posted on 4/11/13 at 7:32 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Malone was taken to replace Deng. Right now for next year it's...
1. Stringer
2. Courtney
3. Coleman
4. Hickey
5. JOB III
6. Hammink
7. Collins
8. Morgan
9. Martin
10. Mickey
11. Quarterman
12. Odo
13. Malone
So 1 of those guys wouldn't be with us next year if we take Bridgewater.
If Malone redshirts will he count against the rosters head count?
2
Posted on 4/11/13 at 7:44 pm to ralsu
We do have a current player whose father is an international basketball superstar that happened to play basketball at LSU. Could he be willing to pay his own way?
Posted on 4/11/13 at 7:47 pm to ralsu
quote:
If Malone redshirts will he count against the rosters head count?
Yes, it's 13 scholarships. Not roster spots.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 7:48 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
an international basketball superstar
ehh
Posted on 4/11/13 at 7:55 pm to Cash
quote:
ehh
Just go with it.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 7:58 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Just go with it.
Geert is the man!
I think Collins or Courtney are out if this is true. If I had to guess, I'd say Collins.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 8:05 pm to LSUAlum2001
I honestly feel like if Courtney weren't coming back in some capacity, JOB wouldn't be coming back.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 8:12 pm to ProjectP2294
Would be a great addition IMO. I realize that he's limited by his size being only around 6'5" but that doesn't mean he can't be a great college contributor for our program if he chooses to come here. Coleman was a 10 and 6 guy for us this year and he's only 6'5". Not sure why Bridgewater can't have a similar impact at some point. Hell, with the guys coming back and the guys coming in, why would anyone balk at this addition if we're going to have another spot available.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 8:46 pm to Tiger Authority
Just to clear up something although it is very unlikely. You can sign to be a walk-on, there are preffered walk-ons that have every thing the team gets and stay where they stay, just "pay" their own way. Though I say it is very unlikely for BB because he has other offers that are decent, I would assume ULL, ULL, and possibly La tech have offered? I also think Tulane would be wise to have gotten him, but Conroy doesn't really recruit in-state guys except a kid from Northshore HS this year.
Just my 2 cents, would love to have as a walk-on but do not think he is any better than anybody we currently have.
Just my 2 cents, would love to have as a walk-on but do not think he is any better than anybody we currently have.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 8:50 pm to rzd30
I don't think it would be as a walk-on. Not sure how we make room for him. My guess would be collins but that is based on nothing but pure speculation.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 8:57 pm to redfish99
quote:
I hope he comes I've watched the kid play for years he can be a nice part of the puzzle for us. Prob a four year contributor.
His cousin, who I work with, says he's a much better player than Brad. Brad just has height on Brian
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:36 pm to Geauxld Finger
I heard that segment on the radio today. It was Ponamsky saying that he now hears that it will happen. They said that our recruitment of bigs and JOB's return closed the deal, because Bridgewater wasn't going to come to LSU if he had to play the 4. He knows that his size means that if he is ever to play in the NBA, it will have to be as a 2, and he wouldn't have any chance to develop those skills if were stuck down low banging with bigs.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:42 pm to BigEdLSU
quote:
My how things have changed. I remember a few years back, people were saying "well, gathers would be a huge get, but Trent HAS to land bridgewater".
This is exactly why I think following recruiting is ridiculous.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:07 pm to Paul Allen
quote:
This is exactly why I think following recruiting is ridiculous.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:11 pm to thunderbird1100
It's true. Things change too often and there's no consistency.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:16 pm to Paul Allen
quote:
's true. Things change too often and there's no consistency
I get it if you don't follow recruiting. But this statement makes it sound exciting to be honest
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:18 pm to Paul Allen
So if it were consistent and static, there would be no reason to follow it.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:34 pm to minimal
quote:
So if it were consistent and static, there would be no reason to follow it.
Man it would be such a good business to tell everyone what their class would be 2 years ahead of time every year.
This post was edited on 4/11/13 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 4/11/13 at 11:57 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Man it would be such a good business to tell everyone what their class would be 2 years ahead of time every year.
Would certainly put a lot of guys out of business.
Certainly be easier on the fans though.
Posted on 4/12/13 at 9:11 am to thunderbird1100
Bridge can't play like Coleman, so no. 
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News