Started By
Message
locked post

Watching old Siskel & Ebert Reviews

Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:07 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:07 pm
for some reason i never thought to go look up S/E reviews of movies. man after watching some of these Gene Siskel was a total pussy. I could only imagine what he would say about movies today (especially post-Japanese invasion and post-gore porn genre)

post some good ones that you find

Die Hard (Ebert haaated it)

Evil Dead (Panned by both. Siskel would hate movies today)

Se7en (Siskel bitches about gore again)

Jurassic Park (Ebert doesn't feel there is a "sense of aw" or "majesty" with the dinos)

Aliens (Ebert thinks it was "overkill" and didn't want his friends to see it. Siskel gives a thumbs down b/c he's a total pussy)

Posted by lsuwontonwrap
Member since Aug 2012
34147 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:15 pm to
lol. Siskel was a real drag.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120760 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:18 pm to
Hard to believe these guys opinions were considered gospel at one point
Posted by R2Z2
Member since Dec 2012
115 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:18 pm to
Morons.
Posted by Fenwick86
Member since May 2007
3533 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:27 pm to
While I respect Roger Ebert's experience in revewing movies, he gets it wrong pretty often. 2 stars for Clockwork Orange comse to mind as one of his worst. I saw he gave a mere 3 stars to In the Mood for Love, should be 4 no question.

Came across this recently (maybe from this board):

Ebert's Worst Reviews
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:49 pm to
?On my phone, so I can't link it, but their review of TMNT is seriously a huge bag of butthurt.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 5:53 pm to
I remember them being so big in the 80's - because before Rotten Tomatoes...they were IT.

People would say..."we need to see this...Siskel and Ebert liked it." - This usually meant it must be good because their shtick was being split. Their TV show seemed to be always on.

I always thought Ebert just loved everything and Siskel was more discriminating and sophisticated as a child.

Now after reading Eberts blog as an adult and looking back...I'm realizing that Siskel just hated pretty much everything that was commercially successful.
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 5:54 pm
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
79461 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 6:06 pm to
Ebert is the hack's hack.
And when he dabbles in politics it really gets sordid.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 6:27 pm to
Ebert's review of the film North is amazing.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63894 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 6:37 pm to
As much of a pussy and a grinch as Siskel was, Leonard Maltin was the biggest pussy of all. See if you can find his review of Saturn 3, which is hilarious.

"Filled with icky special effects."
Posted by The Eric
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
21081 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 7:05 pm to
What a crock. The first time you see the dinos in J-Park I giggle like a school girl. It's very very majestic.

It's in my desert island 5
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59193 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

Jurassic Park (Ebert doesn't feel there is a "sense of aw" or "majesty" with the dinos)


He's right, the Dinos were no where near as frightening as the shark in Jaws
Posted by Tigris
Mexican Home
Member since Jul 2005
12445 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Gene Siskel was a total pussy.


Really? I valued his opinion more so than Ebert's.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram