- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
T or F: Cam Cameron will field a top 50 ranked offense in 2013.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:12 pm
and
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 3:14 pm
31
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:14 pm to ezride25
I'll go with "true."
The talent is there, and I'm confident in his abilities.
I think the biggest roadblock in having that kind of offensive ranking will be the necessity of it... it's not like we're going to need to win games 49-42.
The talent is there, and I'm confident in his abilities.
I think the biggest roadblock in having that kind of offensive ranking will be the necessity of it... it's not like we're going to need to win games 49-42.
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:14 pm to ezride25
sure...why not
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:14 pm to ezride25
T
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:15 pm to ezride25
top 50 = "I told y'all it was Les holding the offense back"
below 50 = "I told y'all Les wouldn't keep his hands off the offense"
below 50 = "I told y'all Les wouldn't keep his hands off the offense"
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:20 pm to ezride25
Top 30 we going to the ship!!
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:22 pm to ezride25
Top 30 we going to the ship!!
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:22 pm to ezride25
True.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:22 pm to ezride25
If our offensive line is solid and relatively injury free, no reason we shouldnt
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:25 pm to ezride25
T
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:25 pm to ezride25
True
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:26 pm to ezride25
the bigger questions are abotu the defense next year
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:27 pm to ezride25
I will go with true. #50 in offense last year was at 408.5 ypg. I see no reason why we can't be better than that.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:35 pm to ezride25
I'll go with true.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:45 pm to ezride25
True
Posted on 2/15/13 at 3:53 pm to ezride25
2 losses
Sorry I'm not sorry.
Sorry I'm not sorry.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 4:00 pm to ezride25
I'll say true, but offensive rankings can be deceiving. LSU often operates on a short field thanks to our defense and special teams, so I'm more concerned with our balance, 3rd down % and redzone efficiency than total yardage.
FWIW, six SEC teams finished in the top 50 last year. LSU averaged 374/ypg (85th) and would need to gain roughly 45 more yards/per to crack last year's top 50.
FWIW, six SEC teams finished in the top 50 last year. LSU averaged 374/ypg (85th) and would need to gain roughly 45 more yards/per to crack last year's top 50.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 4:02 pm to ezride25
True
Posted on 2/15/13 at 4:30 pm to ezride25
possible but, unless i am mistaken, offenses are ranked by YARDAGE GAINED. in today's flag football environment, LSU will probably never be much better than barely in the top 50. yardage gained is not the way to win football games against top competition. this seeming emphasis on yardage gained is fairly new in college football; i'm thinking it is spawned by the passing offenses of some schools and the video game generation. high powered offenses (oregon for example) aren't so high powered when they play good defenses (lsu, auburn) now are they.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 5:14 pm to ezride25
What were we the last 3 years?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News