- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Poor Danny McCray
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:45 pm
Troubling Stat
1.5. Yards per snap allowed in coverage by Danny McCray, the most of all safeties on the field for 50 percent of their teams' snaps, per Pro Football Focus.
LINK
1.5. Yards per snap allowed in coverage by Danny McCray, the most of all safeties on the field for 50 percent of their teams' snaps, per Pro Football Focus.
LINK
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:49 pm to Cajun Revolution
How do you calculate yards in coverage?
Posted on 2/14/13 at 2:50 pm to Melvin
quote:
How do you calculate yards in coverage?
I have no idea. It seems like a fishy stat to me
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:01 pm to Cajun Revolution
We all know what the problem is with the Dallas Cowboys- and it's not Danny McCray.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:04 pm to Cajun Revolution
quote:
Troubling Stat
1.5. Yards per snap allowed in coverage by Danny McCray, the most of all safeties on the field for 50 percent of their teams' snaps, per Pro Football Focus.
Kind of a whack stat IMO. If a player is on the field exactly 50% of the time and you compare him to a player on the field 100% of the time then its not going to be a good summary of the real performance to me. Just my opinion.
In other words, the 50% guy could have had 0 yards/ snap the rest of his time if he played 100%. This stat just assumes that if you play 50% of the time, you are automatically going to play the exact same way if you played every snap. There is truth to it, but there are definitely too many variables in there to consider this measurement objective.
Such as maybe Danny McCray is put in on far more passing situations as a player playing 50% of the time, or maybe one DB plays in a division where they throw the ball less like the NFC West with Zona, Stl, Sea and SF.
This post was edited on 2/14/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:08 pm to Cajun Revolution
That stat means nothing.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:14 pm to Fenwick86
Stats are for losers. The only stat that matters is the W.

Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:17 pm to Cajun Revolution
Danny don't care because Danny is making NFL bank and you are not.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:20 pm to Cajun Revolution
quote:
It seems like a useless stat to me
FIFY
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:28 pm to Cajun Revolution
WTF does that even mean?
Posted on 2/14/13 at 3:34 pm to Broham
Danny McCray is the damn 3rd string safety. He rocks special teams, but really shouldn't have seen much PT on defense, but Cowboys were rattled with injury at the LB and Safety positions.
He blows coverage pretty often, but dude is a monster on special teams and I am happy as a clam to have him on the Cowboys.
He blows coverage pretty often, but dude is a monster on special teams and I am happy as a clam to have him on the Cowboys.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 4:13 pm to Cajun Revolution
he was like the 4th or 5th string safety. injuries forced him to play
Posted on 2/14/13 at 4:32 pm to Papa Tigah
I really enjoyed #44. He was a quality player and a quality young man who brought a want to make plays and deliver hard hits.
Glad to see him get a chance. I hate seeing him get caught up in the Dallas Cowboys search for a scapegoat.
Glad to see him get a chance. I hate seeing him get caught up in the Dallas Cowboys search for a scapegoat.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 4:39 pm to ChanBenoit
Where are you seeing the cowboys use him as a scapegoat?
Don't let your hatred get in the way of facts. Dallas appreciates McCray.
Don't let your hatred get in the way of facts. Dallas appreciates McCray.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 4:40 pm to Cajun Revolution
Honestly, I don't know how that guy even starts in the NFL..
Posted on 2/14/13 at 4:41 pm to Cajun Revolution
quote:
1.5. Yards per snap allowed in coverage by Danny McCray
3 x 1.5 = 4.5.. So.. 4th and 5 to 6?
Does that mean if they threw at McCray every play, he would force a 3-out?
This post was edited on 2/14/13 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 2/14/13 at 4:47 pm to Cajun Revolution
This was also in Sports Illustrated. They did a segment and a lot of LSU players were in there negatively. Early Doucet had the most drops out of any receiver with 50+ targets. Peterman had more sacks allowed then anyone. Don't remember the Corey Webster stat, but he was the worst in the league in something. I want to say another LSU player was the worst in the league in something too, but can't remember who it was. It wasn't the most flattering article for former LSU players.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 6:43 pm to Walter White
quote:Injuries. Is it really that hard to grasp?
Honestly, I don't know how that guy even starts in the NFL..
Popular
Back to top

12






