Started By
Message
locked post

NO/TOR/MEM hypothetical trade

Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:30 am
Posted by BrowDown
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Oct 2012
497 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:30 am
Michael Mc posted this on twitter, I found it interesting.

LINK

NO: Lowry/Gray/Haddadi
TOR: Gay/Vasquez
MEM: Johnson/Lopez/Henry

Great for us, not so sure the others would roll with it.

But imagine if we pulled it off and signed Chandler... 5-7 seed in the second year of the program.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27449 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:33 am to
quote:

But imagine if we pulled it off and signed Chandler... 5-7 seed in the second year of the program.


Chandler is under contract for the next couple of years.

Can't see the Grizzlies doing this, either.
This post was edited on 1/29/13 at 9:35 am
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24849 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:34 am to
I really don't want to let go of Vasquez unless we are getting CP3 or possibly Bledsoe.

Lets just let things gel and see what happens. We are in the catbird seat right now.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40932 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:36 am to
no thanks
Posted by slutiger5
Parroquias de Florida
Member since May 2007
10691 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Great for us, not so sure the others would roll with it.


WTF are you talking about?
Posted by CovSaint53
Covington, LA
Member since Oct 2012
368 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:48 am to
I wouldn't be upset by this trade, but I don't want to part with Vasquez just yet
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96902 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:50 am to
Not interested.


Lowry's a troublemaker and makes more than the General.

Haddadi is green and his contract expires before Lopez' team options run out.

Gray was unimpressive in his time here and I don't see that changing in a return.


On top of that, I don't see Memphis wanting Henry back considering they drafted him and traded him to us for peanuts.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116964 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Great for us


wut
Posted by CQQ
Member since Feb 2006
17048 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Great for us


Uhh, no
Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18853 posts
Posted on 1/29/13 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Great for us

Nah. It's a marginal and unnecessary upgrade at point guard that leaves a gigantic crater at C.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram