Started By
Message

re: Agree or disagree with Steve Carrell on returning as Michael Scott?

Posted on 1/26/13 at 11:46 am to
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 11:46 am to
I never wanted Michael to return as part of any story, I always imagined that Michael would return just to visit his friends, with Holly at his side, and introducing a son or daughter. Longtime fans of the show know that this is something Michael has always wanted and talked about a lot. While I am sure he got all of that, I just was just hoping to actually see it.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158781 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:02 pm to
yeah I don't think he owes the shite, but it was the character that vaulted the show and his career, he should be there for the end.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8354 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:33 pm to
I thought they missed the best opportunity to reintroduce him when David Wallace was buying Dunder Mifflin. They could've referenced Michael being an investor which would open the door for him to make a cameo in any number of ways. Obviously he couldn't be a huge investor because we all know that he sucks with money, so he wouldn't be necessary to any storlyine. But they could've opened it up where David let Michael $5,000 or something, if just for a symbolic ownership. I think it would've been a huge triumph for a character who had given so much of his life to this business to then be an owner of it.
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 1/27/13 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

yeah I don't think he owes the shite, but it was the character that vaulted the show and his career, he should be there for the end.


That was 40 Year Old Virgin.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram