- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Skyfall - midnight showing at rave last night
Posted on 11/8/12 at 9:36 am
Posted on 11/8/12 at 9:36 am
anyone else go? i thought the movie was badass. it was more like a bond film than quantum of solace.
This post was edited on 11/8/12 at 9:44 am
10
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:26 am to horsesandbulls
Neat.
Posted on 11/8/12 at 10:46 am to horsesandbulls
quote:
anyone else go? i thought the movie was badass. it was more like a bond film than quantum of solace.
Please explain.
Posted on 11/8/12 at 11:11 am to horsesandbulls
quote:
Skyfall
The lastest in a long long line of Bond Films that I have never seen.
Posted on 11/8/12 at 11:41 am to CaptainBrannigan
I've never cared much for the bond movies since goldeneye but the reviews have me intrigued. Does this one stand on its own or do I have to check out casino royale and quantum of solace first?
Posted on 11/8/12 at 12:15 pm to Charleaux
quote:
I've never cared much for the bond movies since goldeneye but the reviews have me intrigued. Does this one stand on its own or do I have to check out casino royale and quantum of solace first?
It's a standalone.
Posted on 11/8/12 at 12:39 pm to Charleaux
quote:
I've never cared much for the bond movies since goldeneye but the reviews have me intrigued.
My thoughts exactly.
Posted on 11/8/12 at 1:31 pm to Marciano1
If you haven't seen Casino Royale, watch it.
You don't need to for Skyfall, you need to for you.
You don't need to for Skyfall, you need to for you.
Posted on 11/8/12 at 3:29 pm to horsesandbulls
I guess I'm the minority here as I hated it. If this is the direction Bond is taking, then this franchise is dead to me.
It had a more coherent story than QoS (despite being rather simple, unimaginative and generic compared to previous Bond standards), but other than that, both films had very few Bond elements and didn't bother to follow the same formula that has kept this franchise running for 50 years.
Enough with all the Bourne/M:I/24/Tom Clancey mimicking for frick's sake.
quote:
it was more like a bond film than quantum of solace.
It had a more coherent story than QoS (despite being rather simple, unimaginative and generic compared to previous Bond standards), but other than that, both films had very few Bond elements and didn't bother to follow the same formula that has kept this franchise running for 50 years.
Enough with all the Bourne/M:I/24/Tom Clancey mimicking for frick's sake.
This post was edited on 11/11/12 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 11/8/12 at 3:33 pm to BradPitt
quote:
Enough with all the Bourne/M:I/24/Tom Clancey mimicking for frick's sake.
Why would the studio do that?
To make you happy?
You just admitted you're in the minority.
Posted on 11/8/12 at 3:43 pm to horsesandbulls
I thought that the midnight deal was tonight 
Posted on 11/8/12 at 9:07 pm to Carson123987
Im doing the 11:45 imax tomorrow. Did it live up to the reviews?
Posted on 11/8/12 at 9:08 pm to El Hombre de Moleculoso
I think I'm going to go see the IMAX at 10:15 tonight
Posted on 11/9/12 at 3:36 am to BradPitt
Just saw it. Was very disappointed. It had no substance or depth to it at all, and it just didn't feel like a bond flick. I was so pumped. 
Very shallow film, and it went on way too long. I have no idea how it got such good reviews. Very, very average
Very shallow film, and it went on way too long. I have no idea how it got such good reviews. Very, very average Posted on 11/9/12 at 3:38 am to Carson123987
Was it better than the last one at least?
Posted on 11/9/12 at 3:40 am to horsesandbulls
how did he look holding a Hieney? Gey? Sold-Out?
Posted on 11/9/12 at 3:47 am to Displaced
I thought it was good. Did it live up to all the reviews it got? No but i was entertained and ot was worth admission. Prob the best bond since goldeneye
Posted on 11/9/12 at 5:37 am to lsuguy13
quote:
Prob the best bond since goldeneye
You no like Casino Royale?
Posted on 11/9/12 at 5:40 am to Carson123987
quote:
Just saw it. Was very disappointed. It had no substance or depth to it at all, and it just didn't feel like a bond flick. I was so pumped. Very shallow film, and it went on way too long. I have no idea how it got such good reviews. Very, very average
I'm sad to hear this, since you and I tend to have the same taste in films. I'm a huge Bond nerd and was pumped up as hell about seeing it, but the Chinese assholes delayed the film til February 2 days before it was supposed to be released; I was unbelievably pissed. I'm really hoping you're wrong on this.
And was Javier Bardem's performance as great as everyone said it was? All the reviewers are saying he is without question the greatest Bond villain ever.
Posted on 11/9/12 at 7:11 am to OMLandshark
I plan on seeing it. I thought QOS was okay, but given the writers strike, I'll give them a mulligan.
I've learned that there is absolutely no reason to take reviews read on this site seriously. Some pretentious bastards here. Love you guys, though.
I've learned that there is absolutely no reason to take reviews read on this site seriously. Some pretentious bastards here. Love you guys, though.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News