- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Was Stanford hosed?
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:17 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:17 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
Looked like a td
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to UltimaParadox
Is there a video yet?
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to RLDSC FAN
there is no way the replay is "inconclusive"...it was clear he either a) scored or b) fumbled and OL recovered for TD
refs took the easy way out, but it doesn't make sense
they should have just said they ruled forward momentum had been stopped (which it was, really) and i would be ok with the decision...but if whistle blows no replay, so that isn't what they called
its confusing to me more than anything
refs took the easy way out, but it doesn't make sense
they should have just said they ruled forward momentum had been stopped (which it was, really) and i would be ok with the decision...but if whistle blows no replay, so that isn't what they called
its confusing to me more than anything
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:18 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
It should have been called, but it wasn't. That's the point.
Also, the video evidence needs to be INCONCLUSIVE. He did lose possession.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:19 pm to Moustache
quote:
He did lose possession.
After the ball had clearly crossed the goalline.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:19 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
After the ball had clearly crossed the goalline
And was clearly recovered by Stanford
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:20 pm to Moustache
Looked like he lost possession after touching the goal line. Stanford recovered as well.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:20 pm to LSUlefty
Couldn't tell if his left elbow hit before ball crossed.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:21 pm to Alley
td no doubt, horrible call on the replay
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:21 pm to TH03
He lost the ball when he hit the ND football players foot...the foot was in the endzone...it had to be a TD.
Yes...Stanford got hosed! Going back to watch the second down play now
Yes...Stanford got hosed! Going back to watch the second down play now
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to Alley
quote:
Looked like he lost possession after touching the goal line. Stanford recovered as well.
IF the refs ruled that his forward progress didn't stop, then STanford got hosed. BUT, I think we all know that his forward progress SHOULD have been called.
BAd call, but stanford didn't get hosed. 9/10 times that is called forward progress stopped.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to Moustache
quote:
He did lose possession.
You do know that the second the slightest part of the ball crosses the goal line it's a TD right? The ball was clearly across the goal line with possession. Doesn't really matter though since Stanford recovered the "fumble."
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:22 pm to LSUandAU
He was stopped going forward so I think right call. Surprised that they didn't have Nunes roll out though.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:23 pm to LSUlefty
Correct ruling was fumble, recovered by Stanford in the endzone. However, the NCAA has so much invested in Notre Dame being relevant again that they couldn't let that happen.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:23 pm to Moustache
forward progress is in place to help the offense...on a 4th down play at the goal line it would be pretty rare for the ref to call "forward progress"
ND should have worried about getting him down instead of celebrating after he hit one guy IMO
ND should have worried about getting him down instead of celebrating after he hit one guy IMO
This post was edited on 10/13/12 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:24 pm to Moustache
quote:
BUT, I think we all know that his forward progress SHOULD have been called.
preach on
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:25 pm to Moustache
I've never seen forward progress called in goal line situations like that.
Oh well...sucks for Stanford.
Oh well...sucks for Stanford.
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:40 pm to LSUlefty
Of course,I really hope the media gets what they want and the Irish have to play Alabama in Miami.
Would be a prison rape
Would be a prison rape
Posted on 10/13/12 at 6:41 pm to tigerblood29
quote:
Mike Pereira: We have looked at ND/STA last play from every angle & feel that it is a TD. Progress was not ruled & runner was not down. Ball broke plain.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News