- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is Jerrard Randall #2?
Posted on 7/9/12 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 7/9/12 at 11:18 pm
"An athletic dual-threat passer who can create plays with his legs and his arm ... Possesses one of the strongest arms on the team ... Displayed his athleticism in the spring game when he rushed four times for 27 yards and finished 3-of-4 passing for 24 yards... LINK
BLAH BLAH BLAH. Legit?
BLAH BLAH BLAH. Legit?
11
Posted on 7/9/12 at 11:20 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
He's legit. Very good. I do think he's behind Rivers though.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 11:24 pm to la_birdman
quote:
I do think he's behind Rivers though.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 12:24 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Rivers is most likely #2, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Randall come in for Mett as a change of pace. Sadly this might involve short-side options...
Posted on 7/10/12 at 12:34 am to DocBugbear
quote:Was gonna post :nb4sso:
Sadly this might involve short-side options..
Posted on 7/10/12 at 12:43 am to Mayhawman
I at least posted something relevant first. 
Frankly I like the idea of having a change of pace guy. Once the big RB's wear a defense down, Randall could put up some gaudy numbers with his feet. As far as I'm concerned any time we have a 20 point lead (with the exception of Bama and Arky) we should put Mett on the bench. No point putting him at risk of injury.
Frankly I like the idea of having a change of pace guy. Once the big RB's wear a defense down, Randall could put up some gaudy numbers with his feet. As far as I'm concerned any time we have a 20 point lead (with the exception of Bama and Arky) we should put Mett on the bench. No point putting him at risk of injury.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 1:33 am to DocBugbear
quote:
Sadly this might involve short-side options...
Nothing inherently wrong with short-side options, if the defense doesn't expect it and load up against it.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 1:38 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
I'm not going to berate all future dual threat QBs because of JJ.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 2:19 am to siliconvalleytiger
I hope to see Randall and Rivers get plenty of PT each during the North Texas, Idaho, Townson and Washington games... Perfect timing to get all these QB's some reps just incase of need...
Posted on 7/10/12 at 2:30 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
I hope to see Randall and Rivers get plenty of PT each during the North Texas, Idaho, Townson and Washington games... Perfect timing to get all these QB's some reps just incase of need...
Yeah that would be a good time to give them both a shot to play against some teams to see how they do. I think Rivers is #2
Posted on 7/10/12 at 2:36 am to DocBugbear
Change of pace would be dumb with how potent our offense will be this season.
Miles has brainwashed the fan base.
Miles has brainwashed the fan base.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 2:44 am to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
I'm not going to berate all future dual threat QBs because of JJ.
This right here. The thought of a dual threat QB does still haunt me for now, but Randall is a totally different player. For all we know he could end up being great at the short side option...I don't mind using the change of pace if it works to throw teams off, especially the big games. But if it's not working, I would hope we learned our lesson and didn't try to force it.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 2:58 am to Starchild
Shouldn't let JJ take away from the dual threat. For one he was not a true dual threat, nor was he much of a QB. No offense. Just what it is..
And I *think* it's a situation where Rivers is number 2 on the depth, but Randall is the guy who will come in for certain packages if warranted.. like a young Ryan Perrilloux.
And I *think* it's a situation where Rivers is number 2 on the depth, but Randall is the guy who will come in for certain packages if warranted.. like a young Ryan Perrilloux.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 5:52 am to SouljaBreauxTellEm
As long as they're smart with their throws I'll be happy
Posted on 7/10/12 at 7:15 am to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
I'm not going to berate all future dual threat QBs because of JJ.
No kidding. That's ridiculous. Some people would turn down cammy cam bc they're scared they'll get another JJ.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 7:37 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
pretty sure the staff has Rivers ahead of Randall. Randall seems to have accuracy issues, tries to launch every ball as hard as possible.
then again, accuracy issues didn't stop them from continuing to trot JJ out there....
then again, accuracy issues didn't stop them from continuing to trot JJ out there....
Posted on 7/10/12 at 7:44 am to RBWilliams8
quote:FIFY
Some people wouldn't pay for cammy cam bc they're scared they'll get another JJ.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 7:58 am to DocBugbear
quote:
come in for Mett as a change of pace
I dont have the proper words to relay how much I despise the above statement.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 8:02 am to TIGRLEE
really. i mean does any team with a solid qb need this mythical "change of pace" to run a good offense? because every good offense I've EVER seen in the nfl and ncaa has one qb
Posted on 7/10/12 at 8:04 am to DocBugbear
Do the Patriots bring in a change of pace QB? Packers? Saints?
Page 1 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News