- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Petition for food truck law reform in NOLA
Posted on 3/28/12 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 3/28/12 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 3/28/12 at 11:34 pm to Powerman
quote:
Not signing
fair enough, just putting it out there.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 12:14 am to RonBurgundy
I'm joking
I wouldn't mind having some food trucks
Anything that can make tacos more accessible to me is worth it
I wouldn't mind having some food trucks
Anything that can make tacos more accessible to me is worth it
Posted on 3/29/12 at 12:16 am to RonBurgundy
Signed. I didnt know there was a communist philosophy against Food trucks in NOLA. 

Posted on 3/29/12 at 12:22 am to aldal
You should expect stupid communist philosophies when you have a city that might literally have a collective IQ a standard deviation below the norm.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:46 am to Powerman
They don't want the food trucks stealing business from Emeril. 

Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:06 am to TigerWise
The owner of Ruby Slipper was quoted in a Times Picayune article as being against food trucks because it is "unfair competition" with restaurants like his. He's butt hurt because food trucks don't have overhead like he does.
I find that logic absurd. Following that line of thinking, there should be no new restaurants, because they would compete with existing restaurants. If your food and service are good, people will go there. I now no longer go to Ruby Slipper.
I find that logic absurd. Following that line of thinking, there should be no new restaurants, because they would compete with existing restaurants. If your food and service are good, people will go there. I now no longer go to Ruby Slipper.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:14 am to BrotherEsau
quote:
The owner of Ruby Slipper was quoted in a Times Picayune article as being against food trucks because it is "unfair competition" with restaurants like his.
Ha, what a douche. Guy is just worried because his food sucks.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:24 am to RonBurgundy
Signed. I can understand some restaurants concern, I would hate my business stolen from me too. But this country runs on capitalism, deal with it. With so many restaurants against food trucks, in a city known for food, I think it would be difficult to have any reform in food truck laws.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:27 am to xXLSUXx
The only stipulation for food trucks that restaurants have a legitimate claim about is that they're not allowed to park and operate within a certain distance from brick and mortar restaurants. Other than that it's not unfair competition.
And I'm pretty sure that is part of the law in almost every city/county that regulates them across the country.
And I'm pretty sure that is part of the law in almost every city/county that regulates them across the country.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:33 am to Rohan2Reed
quote:
Ha, what a douche. Guy is just worried because his food sucks.
I will never understand why people flock to the mid city location.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:38 am to Rickety Cricket
someone raised a good point the other day.
If I owned an empty lot downtown and allowed a couple of food truck to park there. A customer of the food truck trips and falls on the sidewalk and decides to file suit. Who is liable ?
If I owned an empty lot downtown and allowed a couple of food truck to park there. A customer of the food truck trips and falls on the sidewalk and decides to file suit. Who is liable ?
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:40 am to Rohan2Reed
quote:
The only stipulation for food trucks that restaurants have a legitimate claim about is that they're not allowed to park and operate within a certain distance from brick and mortar restaurants.
Nah, if they're legally parked, screw the "brick and mortar" joints.
Learn to compete and shut up. I contend each are selling something different (sit down dining versus getting food out of the window of a truck) anyway.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:41 am to Kajungee
quote:
If I owned an empty lot downtown and allowed a couple of food truck to park there. A customer of the food truck trips and falls on the sidewalk and decides to file suit. Who is liable ?
Hopefully you have insurance on your property. But it would depend.
I've been to Ruby Slipper once. I thought it was good. Somewhere I'd go back to, but wouldn't necessarily go out of my way to go back to, ya know? Now, I won't go back.
If food trucks could actually operate in the cbd, I would be very tempted to quit my job and get one.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:44 am to Rickety Cricket
quote:
I will never understand why people flock to the mid city location.
Ruby Slipper Mid-City is one of the ten most overrated restaurants in New Orleans. I had one of the worst breakfasts of my life there. Yet, we still had to wait an hour for a table for two! The highlight of the morning was walking to the Walgreens on Carrollton and Canal and getting a watermelon flavored Big Shot.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:46 am to Kajungee
quote:
If I owned an empty lot downtown and allowed a couple of food truck to park there. A customer of the food truck trips and falls on the sidewalk and decides to file suit. Who is liable ?
The property owner is virtually always "liable", unless the person tripped on something created by the food truck. (I'm simplifying things a great deal).
However, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Slip and Fall/Premises Liability Law has gotten extremely conservative over the past 15 years, and its extremely difficult for a Plaintiff to collect anything unless the property owner didn't have proper clean up procedures and KNEW about the existing condition and did nothing about it.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:46 am to TulaneLSU
quote:
I had one of the worst breakfasts of my life there. Yet, we still had to wait an hour for a table for two!
I've never been able to fathom the notion or appeal of waiting any amount of time to eat breakfast ANYWHERE.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 9:58 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I've never been able to fathom the notion or appeal of waiting any amount of time to eat breakfast ANYWHERE.
It doesn't happen often, but I hate when Russell's has a wait.
Popular
Back to top
