Started By
Message

re: Teabagger in court today

Posted on 3/21/12 at 11:44 am to
Posted by tickfawtiger
Killian LA
Member since Sep 2005
11001 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 11:44 am to
You must be confused as to the PURPOSE of said laws...specially those dealing with sexual deviants...if you disagree/debate...don't stupidly respond with "Seriously" ?
Posted by tickfawtiger
Killian LA
Member since Sep 2005
11001 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 11:48 am to
Your denial of this sexual offense clearly shows your TOTAL lack of resoning skills....you should let the adults handle this issue and stop hurting your little brain
Posted by Krypto
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Aug 2005
1476 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 11:50 am to
So you think a college kid that slaps a girl on the butt in a bar should be labelled a sex offender, and that this is worse than some guy rubbing hi nads on another guys face while said guy is passed out?
Posted by getback
Member since Dec 2011
2199 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

So you think a college kid that slaps a girl on the butt in a bar should be labelled a sex offender, and that this is worse than some guy rubbing hi nads on another guys face while said guy is passed out?


First of all, that is not what the female alleged to have happened.. again, educate yourself.. He pleaded guilty to two counts of misdemeanor sexual battery, and was not labeled a sex offender. He was originally charged with a worse offense, along with 5 other misdemeanors.. So, call it like you see it, I really don't care. I don't think either one should be a registered sex offender for what they did. Or both should be. You miss my whole point. To you, one is worse than the other simply because one is your quarterback, and one is a rival fan.
Posted by Krypto
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Aug 2005
1476 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 3:03 pm to
LINK to Metts charges

OK, since you are all knowing, here is the link to what Mettenberger was charged on as far as sexual battery goes:
quote:

The district attorney also told the paper that the charges stemmed from Mettenberger “grabbing the breasts and touching the buttocks of the victim.”


If you cant see the difference between this and actually taking your genitals out of your pants and rubbing them on another mans face, then you are an ignorant arse. I could care less that he is our quarterback. If he had done what this douche did I would want to see him drawn and quartered too. Get off you high and mighty thrown and look at the facts dumbass.
Posted by tigerbru17
Billy in 4C
Member since Jan 2009
9818 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 3:10 pm to
He is fact. That's how these know it alls work.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12269 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 3:19 pm to
The fact taht we're having this debate and someone is having to defend himself in court over these charges shows just how over-regulated we have become in this society.
The lawyers and bureaucrats have choked this Great Republic and the Free Enterprise System to death with do gooder/"feel good"/ politically correct laws.
If our Patriot Fathers had known tea bagging was to be rendered illegal in this country they may have never had that party in Boston Harbor
Posted by forza
New York, NY
Member since Jan 2012
3 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 3:22 pm to
love it every time "Nuts4LSU" posts in this thread.
Posted by tigerfan in bamaland
Back Home now
Member since Sep 2006
61199 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

I can only assume, since you did not post a reply, that you are referring to Mettenberger. If so, that is a terrible, terrible comparison.


Terrible
Posted by getback
Member since Dec 2011
2199 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

OK, since you are all knowing, here is the link to what Mettenberger was charged on as far as sexual battery goes:


Yeah, I was aware of that, remember? He pleaded guilty to the same crime teabagger has been charged with, and will likely plea down as well... But what you are saying is you want a more severe punishment for one of the perps, correct? Or not correct? Because I guess if one should be more severely punished, logic says you would go with the one who had five other misdemeanors to go with his.. Oh, and there's the case of the other player which you haven't commented on.. Good luck with your crusade..

This post was edited on 3/21/12 at 4:19 pm
Posted by Lonnie4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
9525 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Forcing him to register as a sex offender kind of degrades the sex offender registry


Why?

He degraded himself by exposing himself in public and performing sexual acts in public on a defendless man.

The "sex offender registry" seems like the play for him to me and I would say the same if he was a LSU fan.

Posted by Krypto
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Aug 2005
1476 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 4:36 pm to
As for the other player, you never said who it was so I have no comment. If it was the one mentioned by someone else, I agree with them in thinking he should have never been allowed to join the team.
Do you not know why there is a range of punishment put on every crime and not one set sentence to be handed down?!? Its because each case is different and should be looked at that way. The only person I see on a crusade in this entire topic is you. If you refuse to see the difference between the two instances stated, then you are ignorant. I'm done and you have pproven your stupidity to more than just me at this point so say what you want from here on out. I'm doubting anyone will give a rats arse about your opinion anymore.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33989 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

You miss my whole point. To you, one is worse than the other simply because one is your quarterback, and one is a rival fan.


Might be the way you look at it, but most of us aren't idiots.
Posted by piratedude
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2009
2514 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Your denial of this sexual offense clearly shows your TOTAL lack of resoning skills....you should let the adults handle this issue and stop hurting your little brain


Well, isn't that special. You disagree with the argument, so the other guy must be a doody head. you're probably right, 20 years of practicing law has left me devoid of reasoning skills. Good job pointing it out.




















Doodyhead
Posted by getback
Member since Dec 2011
2199 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

I'm done and you have pproven your stupidity to more than just me at this point so say what you want from here on out. I'm doubting anyone will give a rats arse about your opinion anymore.

Whatever gets you through the night.. I do hope you will find closure with this horrendous personal misfortune some day. Good day to you, sir.. Good day..
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

my entire contention is that it wasn't sexual in nature, and it would be overkill to make the a-hole carry the label of "sex offender" the rest of his life. it was disgusting,nasty, gross and all the other adjectives you can think of, but, imho, it wasn't sexual.

its not over kill, people need to pay for the dumb shite they do. this one just happens to be a bama fan that needs the book thrown at him for his behavior
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
18176 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Nuts4LSU
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46645 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

it is my opinion that there are things you can do with your genitals that aren't sexual in nature, and it is my opinion that this a-hole's acts using his genitals was not sexual in nature, and it is further my opinion that the DA should not and will not seek a conviction that labels the a-hole a sex offender.


Uh rubbing your balls on a passed out person's face isn't one of them.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46645 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

it is my opinion that there are things you can do with your genitals that aren't sexual in nature, and it is my opinion that this a-hole's acts using his genitals was not sexual in nature, and it is further my opinion that the DA should not and will not seek a conviction that labels the a-hole a sex offender.


If this had been a girl he did this too, he would be in some major shite. I don't u d'état and why it should be any diff. He put is balls on a passed out human's face. Shouldn't matter gender
Posted by AUTiger83
ATL
Member since Sep 2006
2188 posts
Posted on 3/21/12 at 10:01 pm to
They should let the victim taze the motherfricker.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram