Started By
Message
locked post

Do you need to be more athletic to play 2nd base or 3rd?

Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:09 am
Posted by LSUIEGRAD13
Member since Jan 2011
3939 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:09 am
Explain.
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
6051 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:13 am to
I've played both. I feel you need to be more athletic to play second because you honestly have more range to cover and you have more responsibility in bunt coverage and you need quick feet for the ability to turn a double play. However, I also think you need better reaction time be at third because the ball seems to come at you at a faster clip than other infield positions not counting the pitcher. JMO
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54838 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:13 am to
2nd basemen seem to be more athletic as a whole, but 3rd is the more difficult position to play.

2nd basemen have to cover more ground, but 3rd has to have better reflexes and a very good arm.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154175 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:14 am to
2nd is more difficult and you will see better fielders there
Posted by Slickback
Deer Stand
Member since Mar 2008
28076 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:18 am to
2nd IMO because you have to cover more ground.


Better have a quick glove if you're playing third though. They get some rockets over there.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116730 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:19 am to
quote:

but 3rd has to have better reflexes and a very good arm.

This. I played both. 3B is a much more intense position mentally. You have to say to yourself on every pitch "line drive gonna short me". If you don't, then when it comes you get eaten up. 2B is more relaxed. Even if a line drive comes you just block it, pick it up and make the short throw to first.
Posted by LSUIEGRAD13
Member since Jan 2011
3939 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:20 am to
So having a quick glove is not athletic? Many baseball players are fast,but far less have a great glove.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:21 am to
Probably second, because you have to cover ground in both directions, whereas at 3B, you have to only go to your left (mostly).

2B historically is also a "defense first" type of position. Not until recently, really, have 2B really put up monster offensive numbers.
Posted by 5Alive
With Your Moms
Member since Jul 2009
7849 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:23 am to
No having a quick glove does not equate to being athletic. U can have a quick glove and be a poor 2nd baseman bc u have no range/good feet etc.
Posted by Chatagnier
Member since Sep 2008
6851 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:26 am to
Better question. Do you have to be more athletic to play SS over 2nd?

I say yes, Way more ground to cover plus a longer throw.
Posted by LSUIEGRAD13
Member since Jan 2011
3939 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:26 am to
Everyone thinks speed only when talking about athletic ability. Maybe 2nd is more athletic but I value having a good glove and consider that athletic.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54838 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Better question. Do you have to be more athletic to play SS over 2nd?

Not a better question, the answer is obvious.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154175 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:31 am to
In the 80s Bill James wrote that there is a defensive continuum:

SS
2b
3b
CF
RF
LF
1b

(Catcher is a special case)

Players inevitably move down the cotinuum as their skills erode. Moving up the continuum is very rare and seldom successful.
Posted by Ioncehitta Longball
LAFFY
Member since Aug 2011
881 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:34 am to
Overall 3rd. Most 2nd baseman are guys who don't have the arm strength to play SS.

At 3rd you have piss rockets hit at you and have a long throw across the diamond, however, there is limited amounts of distance one must cover.

At 2nd you normally are able to play deeper because you have so much more time to make the toss over to 1st. Yes they have more range to cover but that's the only thing more athletic about the position.

I know I perfer a hoss at 3rd, then a good 2nd baseman.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Overall 3rd. Most 2nd baseman are guys who don't have the arm strength to play SS.


Wait, what?

Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154175 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:49 am to
I hope you become manager of the Yankees
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63014 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 10:50 am to
quote:

2nd basemen seem to be more athletic as a whole, but 3rd is the more difficult position to play.

2nd basemen have to cover more ground, but 3rd has to have better reflexes and a very good arm


This. SS and CF require the most athleticism. Catcher is the toughest position to play
Posted by keakdasneak
Member since Dec 2006
7186 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 11:00 am to
It's not necessarily more athletic but different skills. 2nd basemen need quicker feet and 3rd basemen need quick reflexes/hands and stronger arm.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 11:00 am to
Well, there aren't very many Miguel Cabreras roaming around 2B.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 3/14/12 at 11:05 am to
2nd because the guys who play 2nd in MLB are more athletic than the guys who play 3rd.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram