- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Brady sacked ... over or under 3.5 times?
Posted on 2/3/12 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 2/3/12 at 11:57 pm
I made that number up. It seems right to me
I say under
I say under
7
Posted on 2/3/12 at 11:58 pm to gizmoflak
hmmmm the hook seems deadly on this one. I'd go under too but it's close
Posted on 2/4/12 at 12:05 am to jacks40
This is a hard one. Over I guess. 4.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 12:10 am to LSUIEGRAD13
Under, will only be sacked twice both by linebackers on a blitz, none from the DL
Posted on 2/4/12 at 12:34 am to gizmoflak
Under
Posted on 2/4/12 at 12:42 am to gizmoflak
Great line.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 3:38 am to gizmoflak
Under.
Real question: o/u 1 Andrew luck mention, or Kelly clarkson o/u 1:34 national anthem start to finish.
Real question: o/u 1 Andrew luck mention, or Kelly clarkson o/u 1:34 national anthem start to finish.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 5:54 am to Lee to Toliver
quote:way over
Real question: o/u 1 Andrew luck mention
Posted on 2/4/12 at 9:14 am to LSUIEGRAD13
quote:
This is a hard one. Over I guess. 4.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 9:56 am to gizmoflak
I say under, especially since Gronk is a go. The Giants front is beastly but if anyone can make them a tad bit irrelevant it's Brady. He will be able to dump off to 3 or 4 different guys and not only divert a sack or a loss but more than likely make a pretty decent gain.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 10:04 am to Michael J Cocks
Under
Posted on 2/4/12 at 10:29 am to Tactical1
I'm pretty sure the real prop line on this is 4. Not that I'd know, because gambling on things such as football is not legal in most jurisdictions, and I'd never engage in such shenanigans.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 10:42 am to John McClane
Under.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 10:46 am to BoardReader
quote:
I'm pretty sure the real prop line on this is 4
I highly doubt that, unless the line is really juiced on the under ...like -160
Posted on 2/4/12 at 11:39 am to castorinho
quote:
I highly doubt that, unless the line is really juiced on the under ...like -160
IIRC, it was something like -150 on the under.
Posted on 2/4/12 at 2:51 pm to gizmoflak
under.
ESPN did a stat the other day about how hard it is for the Giants to get a sack when playing against 2 TE sets, which NE runs 70% of the time
ESPN did a stat the other day about how hard it is for the Giants to get a sack when playing against 2 TE sets, which NE runs 70% of the time
Posted on 2/4/12 at 3:03 pm to quail man
under
EVERYBODY is disrespecting how good the patriots o-line is. they might be the best pass blocking group in the league and i'm willing to bet they're pissed at the lack of respect they're being given
EVERYBODY is disrespecting how good the patriots o-line is. they might be the best pass blocking group in the league and i'm willing to bet they're pissed at the lack of respect they're being given
Posted on 2/4/12 at 8:34 pm to gizmoflak
Under.
This o-line is quite good.
This o-line is quite good.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News