- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Yeah, that Chandler trade really worked out for us
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:06 am
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:06 am
Signed,
He'll never be the same/
Hugh Weber always tell the truth
He'll never be the same/
Hugh Weber always tell the truth
This post was edited on 5/3/11 at 12:08 am
6
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:12 am to NIH
Okafor was better than him anyway when we made the trade.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:14 am to tehchampion140
One year=/=smart move
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:35 am to NIH
Harvey Hornet: He has a degenerative foot condition. He will never be the same.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:47 am to Tmon225
what's wrong with taking on a longer, worse contract in order to save a couple of millions in the short term?
U MAD
U MAD
Posted on 5/3/11 at 1:31 am to death valley driver
Chandler is getting a ring this year. Ya herd?!
Posted on 5/3/11 at 6:58 am to NIH
Really?
He was the perfect fit for the Hornets, but Chandler was rarely healthy in 08-09 and flat out awful last year with the Bobcats.
So you're saying the Hornets should have kept a poor, injury plagued player while going over the luxury tax line with a bankrupt owner? All because he is playing well in a contract year?
He was the perfect fit for the Hornets, but Chandler was rarely healthy in 08-09 and flat out awful last year with the Bobcats.
So you're saying the Hornets should have kept a poor, injury plagued player while going over the luxury tax line with a bankrupt owner? All because he is playing well in a contract year?
This post was edited on 5/3/11 at 7:07 am
Posted on 5/3/11 at 7:34 am to corndeaux
quote:
So you're saying the Hornets should have kept a poor, injury plagued player while going over the luxury tax line with a bankrupt owner? All because he is playing well in a contract year?
My 20/20 hindsight looks forward, brah.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 7:35 am to NIH
I have no problem with the trade. Outside of two years, this and 07, tyson's been a bust. I wish him well but it's no use getting upset over.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 7:36 am to The Cable Guy
quote:
Outside of two years, this and 07, tyson's been a bust.
I don't wish him ill, but I would feel better about it if this year was a fluke.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 7:50 am to tehchampion140
quote:
Okafor was better than him anyway when we made the trade.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 7:59 am to corndeaux
quote:
So you're saying the Hornets should have kept a poor, injury plagued player while going over the luxury tax line with a bankrupt owner? All because he is playing well in a contract year?
this
Posted on 5/3/11 at 8:52 am to corndeaux
quote:
So you're saying the Hornets should have kept a poor, injury plagued player while going over the luxury tax line with a bankrupt owner? All because he is playing well in a contract year?
Not to mention even if he was on the Hornets and having the same year as a FA some team like maybe DALLAS would just come in and overpay for him anyway
Posted on 5/3/11 at 9:00 am to NIH
Everyone Harvey hates or bad mouths turns out can ball.
IE- Chandler, JR Smith, etc., etc., etc.....
IE- Chandler, JR Smith, etc., etc., etc.....
Posted on 5/3/11 at 9:05 am to corndeaux
quote:
So you're saying the Hornets should have kept a poor, injury plagued player while going over the luxury tax line with a bankrupt owner? All because he is playing well in a contract year?
In hindsight, yeh probably. It would be nice to have that 12 million dollar contract coming off the books
Posted on 5/3/11 at 9:57 am to corndeaux
quote:
So you're saying the Hornets should have kept a poor, injury plagued player while going over the luxury tax line with a bankrupt owner? All because he is playing well in a contract year?
If this is a fluke year and he'll be going down again soon then the Hornets made the right choice. If not Shinn's finances screwed the team again. If he's back to normal then it probably would have been better to have an owner that could have afforded to let the GM use the MLE on a stop gap center while Chandler healed up.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 10:11 am to TigerinATL
Are people really saying this was a good move? Blind loyalty is one thing, but this is ridiculous.
Chandler>>>>>>>>>>>>>Okafor
And Okafor is scheduled to make 14 million three years from now.
Chandler>>>>>>>>>>>>>Okafor
And Okafor is scheduled to make 14 million three years from now.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 11:15 am to mhasen1
quote:
Chandler>>>>>>>>>>>>>Okafor
Well, if Chandler stays healthy and continues to play well then maybe so. However as someone said above this year makes year number two he's played at this level. We'll see. Plus he'll want to get paid big time.
Posted on 5/3/11 at 11:38 am to VOR
so it's alright to complain about letting a guy go 3 years ago but we can't bring up Thornton?
just saying
and f**k Chandler, he was never going to "recover" here
just saying
and f**k Chandler, he was never going to "recover" here
Posted on 5/3/11 at 11:46 am to stapuffmarshy
quote:
so it's alright to complain about letting a guy go 3 years ago but we can't bring up Thornton?
The thing about that is, this isn't the 1,000,000th thread about Chandler.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News