- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mark Ingram meeting with Saints Wednesday
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:24 am
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:24 am
What are Saints' fans thoughts on having Mark in the backfield?
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:28 am to RollDatRoll
If we can get him at a steal value (2nd round) then yes. But that's not happening.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:30 am to BhamBama13
quote:
Message Posted by BhamBama13 What are Saints' fans thoughts on having Mark in the backfield?
No problem with him in the backfield. Going RB instead of front 7 D, thats an issue
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:30 am to BhamBama13
Not a need or even BPA for us.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:31 am to BhamBama13
I like the idea of him in the backfield. I don't like the idea of drafting him in the 1st. That is an expensive backfield.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:31 am to Sophandros
quote:
even BPA for us.
how they hell you figure this if lets say he's 15th on the saints board and 1-14 are asta lu Ega. (no idea on spelling!)
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:38 am to BhamBama13
quote:
What are Saints' fans thoughts on having Mark in the backfield?
A good fit. But I would surprised if he is still there at #24. DE and OLB are bigger needs. We only registered one sack or fewer in seven games last year.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:45 am to BhamBama13
going to Miami book it.
Would I love to have him? Sure. But we got bigger needs.
Would I love to have him? Sure. But we got bigger needs.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:45 am to LooseCannon22282
quote:
A good fit. But I would surprised if he is still there at #24. DE and OLB are bigger needs. We only registered one sack or fewer in seven games last year.
DE is the deepest position in this draft, Is the DE your going to get in the first that much better than the guy in the second. Theres not a no branier DE at 24 and If Ingram is there i hope we take him
This post was edited on 4/5/11 at 9:46 am
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:51 am to SaintNation
quote:
DE is the deepest position in this draft,
Correct.
quote:
Theres not a no branier DE at 24 and If Ingram is there i hope we take him
Better taking one at #24 then waiting to use it at #56,#72,or #88. If Ingram is there, then yes give him a good look. In my opinion, he will already be gone.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 9:54 am to SaintNation
quote:
DE is the deepest position in this draft,
And it's one of the quickest positions to be depleted of talent.
quote:
Is the DE your going to get in the first that much better than the guy in the second.
I think so.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 10:18 am to jacks40
He would certainly get consideration at #24 but I would expect a higher rated DE, DT, or even OT still available. Current stock watch has him sliding closer to the 2nd Rd. So I don't expect it but if they did, I could hack it. The established Payton/Loomis draft track record would take some completely off the wall pick to get our criticism.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 10:21 am to blueslover
I said during the combine that I'm not sold on Ingram as a good fit for our system, and I'm sticking to it.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 3:37 pm to Sophandros
quote:why? Not saying I want to draft him just curious because he reminds me of a quicker PT
I said during the combine that I'm not sold on Ingram as a good fit for our system, and I'm sticking to it.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 3:55 pm to Jschoen10
This reminds me when our choice was Wells or Jenkins... I'm glad we got Jenkins
This post was edited on 4/5/11 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 4/5/11 at 4:30 pm to BhamBama13
At the right pick...sure. As a first rounder, frick no.
Posted on 4/5/11 at 6:17 pm to deuce985
Ingram would kill in our screen game. But I don't like the idea of not going D in the first.
Popular
Back to top

10






