Started By
Message
locked post

How did USC sign 30 players?

Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:23 am
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45836 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:23 am
I thought they were supposed to lose scholarships? Just wondering.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66525 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:24 am to
I think it has to do with them hoping they win the appeal.

Or they'll just have to sign like 10 kids next year.
Posted by LSUintheNW
At your mom’s house
Member since Aug 2009
36772 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:24 am to
should read all the other threads that have mentioned it.....
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
79863 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:26 am to
boom
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38442 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:27 am to
Reductions don't go into place until the appeal is ruled on (so next year). Because of the guys who left, they were able to bring in 8 early enrollees plus a full class of fall enrollments
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45836 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:28 am to
Thank you.

Was the bowl ban only one year? I forget.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38442 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:29 am to
2. They decided to just serve the bowl ban and get it over with while waiting on the scholarships
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:29 am to
2 or 3.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
79863 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:33 am to
Spreading it out was a good plan even if the appeal doesn't go through.

Plus the fact they weren't great this year helped in accepting the bowl ban.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38442 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Plus the fact they weren't great this year helped in accepting the bowl ban.



yea. I don't think anyone was that upset, including many of the players probably, about not playing in the Sun or Fight Hunger Bowl
This post was edited on 2/3/11 at 9:36 am
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45836 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:37 am to
How dare you mock the KRAFT FIGHT HUNGER BOWL
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36382 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:41 am to
quote:

yea. I don't think anyone was that upset, including many of the players probably, about not playing in the Sun or Fight Hunger Bowl


The funny thing is, because the Pac 10 sucked (but still got 2 BCS teams) you guys probably would have been in a pretty good bowl. I mean, it still makes sense to just accept the ban since you wouldn't have made the BCS (and could tell before the season), but you probably would have been in something that's at least a little prestigious, like the Holiday.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:47 am to
quote:

I think it has to do with them hoping they win the appeal.

Or they'll just have to sign like 10 kids next year.


As I stated in another thread the 75 scholarship limit is going to be a huge problem with the size on this class. They only lose 13 seoniors after this year so USC may be looking at some seriously small classes in the next couple of years.

Or they could just play the Nick Saban game and cut playing who are underforming so they can still sign their allotment of 15 a year.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38442 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:49 am to
quote:

As I stated in another thread the 75 scholarship limit is going to be a huge problem with the size on this class. They only lose 13 seoniors after this year so USC may be looking at some seriously small classes in the next couple of years


SC was so far below the 85 limit this year that they really needed to stock up on bodies this year to soften the blow for later, even if it means small classes. If they hadn't, it would have been disasterous

quote:

Or they could just play the Nick Saban game and cut playing who are underforming so they can still sign their allotment of 15 a year.



If there's ever a time to oversign, it's while on probation
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
79863 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:50 am to
As was already said, they have had some transfers more than usual and i'm sure the typical dropouts.

It will be interesting to see how many they get to sign next year. Ohio State only has around 15-17 schollies to give out next year...
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37712 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:53 am to
quote:

They only lose 13 seoniors after this year so USC may be looking at some seriously small classes in the next couple of years.


The shollie reduction is at 20 and Pete often took less than 20. They are hopinng to get five back. Thee is also attrition, such as players leaving early or leaving the team. We'll be fine with size until the last year. Then after that we are back to loading up with 30+.
quote:

Or they could just play the Nick Saban game and cut playing who are underforming so they can still sign their allotment of 15 a year.


If a player is not making the cut, I am sure the option will be to 1) transfer or 2) be cut.
This post was edited on 2/3/11 at 9:57 am
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4677 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Because of the guys who left, they were able to bring in 8 early enrollees plus a full class of fall enrollments
This is the biggest reason why they were able to sign 30 players. Guys like Seantrel Henderson signed with USC but didn't end up attending because the NCAA let them out of their LOI because of the sanctions.

In reality, their 2011 class was only 22-25 players. Since the scholarship reductions are under appeal, they will more than likely be pushed back a year after USC loses imo.

This post was edited on 2/3/11 at 9:57 am
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37712 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:56 am to
Getting the #1 OL from Ohio allowed us to take 30.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
79863 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Getting the #1 OL from Ohio allowed us to take 30.



:nuketown:
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45836 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Getting the #1 OL from Ohio allowed us to take 30.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram