Started By
Message
locked post

better off without ridley??

Posted on 12/28/10 at 3:51 pm
Posted by death valley driver
CHOPPA CITY
Member since Jul 2004
11676 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 3:51 pm
no more 3 yard and a cloud of dust offense and we can get carries to our more explosive players resulting in bigger offensive PRODUCTION
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
15279 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 3:53 pm to
So basically another "Les Miles is an idiot who plays the lesser talent" post?
Posted by ATR
Utopos
Member since Feb 2008
916 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 3:53 pm to
strange. i'd thought ridley had proved to be our most productive player.

the offense is not radically going to change without #34.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
44874 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 3:54 pm to
Stupid arse
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
21963 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 3:56 pm to
Better off without Ridley?
Posted by LSUGrad9295
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
36913 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

no more 3 yard and a cloud of dust offense and we can get carries to our more explosive players resulting in bigger offensive PRODUCTION


Wait...wait...I got this one. I am good at translating "ranter-ese".

What he is saying is that "I am one of the douches who has a major Michael Ford hard-on because, after all, he kicked arse in the SPRING GAME and was like a 9-star recruit. And Ridley's 1000+ yards were not enough for me. Every play should be an 80 yard run"
Posted by alange
Island hoppin
Member since Feb 2009
4820 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:02 pm to
Not only have you underestimated the ability of a great runningback, but you've underestimated the inability of our OC to use the remaining players on the roster.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69489 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:02 pm to
So your saying we could be better off with out our most consistent offensive performer on a terrible offense? I say no!

Posted by NOX
Member since Dec 2009
5917 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:07 pm to
are we better off... no. do we have depth to make up for the possible loss... yes.

Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
30232 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

better off without ridley??


How quickly we forget.......Ridley WAS our fricking offense when we were mired in the throngs of Jefferson and Lee trying to find themselves.....without Ridley this year how many more loses would we have I wonder.

but you're right we don't need him in the bowl game and we are better off without the guy that has proven to be our best offensive player this year.....yeah you're right
Posted by Opelousas Loosas
Member since Dec 2010
24 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:09 pm to
We have elite RB's just waiting to pound the Aggies. Ridley's absence will hardly be noticed.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69489 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

We have elite RB's just waiting to pound the Aggies. Ridley's absence will hardly be noticed.


I haven't seen one of our talented rb's that will pound the aggies like ridley will

Posted by tigafan89
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
1339 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:16 pm to
LSU has no shortage of talented running backs. Michael Ford and others will easily pick up where Ridley was.
Posted by NOX
Member since Dec 2009
5917 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

How quickly we forget.......Ridley WAS our fricking offense when we were mired in the throngs of Jefferson and Lee trying to find themselves.....without Ridley this year how many more loses would we have I wonder.


+1000
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69489 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

LSU has no shortage of talented running backs. Michael Ford and others will easily pick up where Ridley was.


So why didn't they get more carries throughout the year? Which one will lower the boom on the db's? From what I saw of our talented stable of rb's was they like to run outside the tackles...unlike ridley
Posted by Francisco106708
Nola
Member since May 2010
405 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

bigger offensive PRODUCTION


So you are partly blaming Ridley for the lack of offensive production this year? YOUR NUTS! I agree Ford should have gotten more of the load this year, but Ridley has done nothing but work his arse off all year. What he lacks in speed he makes up for in consistency, power and toughness. He's one of the best on the team, C'MON MAN.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62024 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

death valley driver


Rantardasaurus
Posted by Politiceaux
Member since Feb 2009
17664 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

death valley driver

LINK
Posted by LSUPhreaK
LaPlace, La.
Member since Dec 2003
10936 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:46 pm to
You people are shocked by "the driveman" and his retarded posts?
Posted by BDtiger5
Member since Feb 2010
1049 posts
Posted on 12/28/10 at 4:48 pm to
your an idiot.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram