- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

2012 would be the perfect year to put Pete Rose on the HOF ballot
Posted on 12/2/10 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 12/2/10 at 4:25 pm
2012 is going to be a slow year for the HOF. Outside of Bernie Williams, there isn't a single player on the ballot for the first time who is even close to being HOF-worthy. I have a hard time seeing Bagwell, Palmeiro or Walker getting in within their first two years. Bagwell is the only player out of that group with a remote chance of getting in that early but I see the writers holding his lack of counting numbers (Bagwell had fewer than 500 HRs, 1000 extra base hits and 2500 base hits) against him. Blyleven and Alomar will be in next year. I believe the only player with a decent shot of being inducted in 2012 is Barry Larkin. But even that's a stretch. How often does a player go from receiving 51% of the votes to 75% in two years? Not many. So there's a good chance no players on the ballots will gets in. It'll be a very quiet year and the HOF will continue to lose money.
But if Selig allows Pete to be put on the ballots, he could generate a lot of intrigue and a lot of excitement back into the HOF voting process. There will be people all over the country talking about baseball again. The hoopla of Rose being inducted won't overshadow other recently inducted players since there likely won't be another player sharing the stage with him. Cooperstown will rake in a ton of dough from the increased attendance. It would be the best case scenario for everybody.
But if Selig allows Pete to be put on the ballots, he could generate a lot of intrigue and a lot of excitement back into the HOF voting process. There will be people all over the country talking about baseball again. The hoopla of Rose being inducted won't overshadow other recently inducted players since there likely won't be another player sharing the stage with him. Cooperstown will rake in a ton of dough from the increased attendance. It would be the best case scenario for everybody.
Posted on 12/2/10 at 4:26 pm to Bench McElroy
This is the year for Mattingly 

Posted on 12/2/10 at 4:27 pm to Bench McElroy
PETER EDWARD ROSE deserves to be in the HOF as a PLAYER.




Posted on 12/2/10 at 4:37 pm to Bench McElroy
2012 HOF Class= Barry Larkin and Jack Morris
Posted on 12/2/10 at 4:39 pm to TigerintheNO
Cheating or not the man was a heck of a baseball player.
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:05 pm to Vols22
Bagwell deserves to get in. He did so much on the field, but he's underrated because he played in Houston and didn't win the WS.
I think a vast majority of baseball fans agree that Rose should get in. The solution is simple: just keep him "banned" from baseball as his continuing punishment.
I think a vast majority of baseball fans agree that Rose should get in. The solution is simple: just keep him "banned" from baseball as his continuing punishment.
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:11 pm to mattz1122
quote:If he spends his career at Wrigley, he might have 600 HRs.
Bagwell deserves to get in. He did so much on the field, but he's underrated because he played in The Astrodome and didn't win the WS.
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:26 pm to Bench McElroy
Im all for Rose being on the ballot
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:26 pm to Kafka
quote:
Kafka
He Deserves to be in the Hall way ahead of Rose
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:28 pm to tduecen
quote:
Mattingly
its not the hall of very good, its the hall of fame
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:32 pm to dukke v
quote:not UNTIL shoeLESS joe JACKSON is ALLOWED in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PETER EDWARD ROSE deserves to be in the HOF as a PLAYER.
he was an illiterate frick you should be a big fan
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:33 pm to Kafka
quote:i posted before I saw this, but you sir are gentleman and a scholar
Kafka
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:35 pm to OWLFAN86
IM going to agree with this. Shoeless Joe gets in first, then Rose.
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:39 pm to bomber77
quote:Same here.
IM going to agree with this. Shoeless Joe gets in first, then Rose.
Posted on 12/2/10 at 5:39 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
you sir are gentleman and a scholar
i'd like to say the same for you
i'd like to, but i'd be lying
Posted on 12/2/10 at 6:29 pm to bomber77
quote:
Shoeless Joe gets in first, then Rose.
First of all, I think both should be in, but their plaques should have a statement stating that they were banned from baseball for their respective crimes against the sport. The HOF is a museum, and the good should be displayed along with the bad.
Second, Shoeless Joe allegedly threw the World Series...that's the ultimate crime in the game to me; so if anyone deserves the "death penalty" it's the members of the 1919 Chicago White Sox. No one involved with the investigation of Pete Rose ever found evidence that he bet against his team. I say Rose gets in before Jackson.
This post was edited on 12/2/10 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 12/2/10 at 6:31 pm to medtiger
quote:post event investigation show very little or no evidence that he was involved,,dude had a solid WS stats
allegedly
Posted on 12/2/10 at 6:32 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Im no gentleman
:kige:
Popular
Back to top
