Started By
Message

re: Jordan Jefferson vs Geno Smith

Posted on 9/24/10 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22794 posts
Posted on 9/24/10 at 3:18 pm to
About half as many attempts about half as many yards. People conveniently forget when quoting or lackluster passing yards that it is mainly because we don't pass often. AND WE SHOULDN'T WHEN WE PLAY INFERIOR COMPETITION.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16821 posts
Posted on 9/24/10 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

AND WE SHOULDN'T WHEN WE PLAY INFERIOR COMPETITION.


you say that as if there are no style points in BCS rankings....
Posted by Chicot
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2007
1279 posts
Posted on 9/24/10 at 3:20 pm to
JJ was 10 for 16 last week. We called alot more than 16 passes last week. JJ just turned them into runs.
Posted by ChineseBanditSlayer
London, WV
Member since Sep 2010
218 posts
Posted on 9/24/10 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

AND WE SHOULDN'T WHEN WE PLAY INFERIOR COMPETITION.


I know what you mean....look at the GA team that took you boys to the woodshed a few years ago. We knew they were inferior, that's why we just ran the ball.
Posted by batman
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2004
691 posts
Posted on 9/24/10 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

People conveniently forget when quoting or lackluster passing yards that it is mainly because we don't pass often.


theres a reason we don't pass often.

quote:

AND WE SHOULDN'T WHEN WE PLAY INFERIOR COMPETITION.


I dont understand this. why should you only pass when playing good competition? makes no sense to be one-dimensional.

you would think you'd like to get some real-game passing reps in when playing inferior competition.
Posted by Herbstreit
Member since Sep 2008
734 posts
Posted on 9/24/10 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

People conveniently forget when quoting or lackluster passing yards that it is mainly because we don't pass often.


Still doesn't make up for the fact that when we do pass we're only hitting our target 57% of the time. Also, the lack of passing will get DB's cheating up and should in turn make our WR's a little more open.

I haven't read though the whole thread, but just wanted to point this out after seeing it on the 1st page.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
24297 posts
Posted on 9/24/10 at 5:47 pm to
I don't really buy into the idea that our passing #s could be significantly better right now if we passed a lot more. They would be better, but I don't think there would be a drastic change through these first few games.

Some people are saying we've run because that's all we needed to do against these opponents. That's not really true. We tried to pass it in the end zone and it got picked against Vandy. We tried to pass a couple of times in the end zone against State as well. Shepard dropped one and it looked like Toliver had a difficult time locating the other one (or it was slightly overthrown). So it's been JJ and sometimes the receivers that have lead to a decently ineffective passing game when it comes to scoring points and sustaining drives (though last Saturday was much better with keeping drives going).

Against Vandy, we didn't really run on them at will until the back half of the game. I think we were up by 7 going into the 4th. So it's not as if we were doing whatever we wanted offensively and having it work against them for the first 2 quarters. And State did a pretty good job against our running game until the 3rd quarter when we starting wearing them down some. We should have passed more in the back half of that game to try and get things clicking with the passing game. JJ was very accurate against State, but still taking too long to throw the ball. And the bottom line is that we need to throw it further down field more because our production right now won't get it done against the best of the best. I was very happy with the win and feel the coaches had the team well prepared, but feel that they didn't do a very good job of preparing for our future needs in regards to passing.

As for comparison of the 2 QBs, Smith has started off very well. That's a great completion % against any team. Their opponents have been pretty poor, but he does look very talented. Still, he hasn't faced teams that bring a lot of heat yet. So you have to wait until that happens to see what he's really like. He also has the NCAA's current career leading rusher with him on offense in Devine. I think the guy is at 5,000 yards total for his career in rushing, receiving and returns. So teams are focused on Devine and that open things up for the QB.

As for LSU - our running game has been pretty good too, but we don't have anyone at Devine status yet. JJ has been decent at best this year. He's gonna need to get it going now. He started off slow last year and finished much stronger. Hopefully, he can do that this year too. Our passing game should be much better right now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram