Started By
Message
locked post

Wow...This UT Arrogance Knows No Bounds...

Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:02 pm
Posted by GABlueDog
Marietta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
8045 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:02 pm
The following quotes are from some guy named Kirk Bohls who writes for the Austin paper - LINK

quote:

After weeks of negotiating, haggling, whispering and rumor-denying, massive conference realignment eventually became minuscule, and the major points were driven home loud and clear. Don't mess with Texas. And Texas doesn't mess up.

quote:

If you haven't been paying attention, the Longhorns ruled the Big 12 for a decade-and-a-half, and they will rule the new Big 12.

quote:

Quite simply, the nation should know now — if it didn't before — that Texas is on par with Notre Dame, the prize every league from the WAC to the MAC would love to have. The Big Ten or Pac-10 might make overtures to Texas again. Texas can go to any conference it wishes.

quote:

"There's no doubt in my mind," one Longhorns head coach said Tuesday, "that if Texas called the Big East and said we wanted to come, they'd say, ‘Absolutely.' "When that coach was told by colleagues around the nation that Texas should go independent and make its own way, he said with a chuckle, "Yeah, you're right. We're powerful."


Not sure comparing yourself to Notre Dame and the Big East is the best measure of your awesomeness but whatever.

At least he offered this:
quote:

Every school has to look out for its own interests, but here's a wish that Texas would make more compromises in terms of revenue-sharing if it truly wants to act like a family. The fact that it gets the lion's share of the Big 12 money — and the Bears' and the Tigers' and the Wildcats' share, etc. — will always be problematic and breed resentment.


And even he questions where the $ is going to come from:
quote:

This new alliance smacks of a tenuous, flimsy arrangement that binds together the remaining 10 teams. On Tuesday, there was no announcement of that pending, new television deal with Fox, no hard figures as to what Texas or any of the schools can expect, although a Big 12 spokesman said estimates that all of the schools could top at least $14 million a year — and that Texas, OU and A&M could reach $20 million — are "believed to be realistic."

Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
64533 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

"believed to be realistic."
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29864 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

When that coach was told by colleagues around the nation that Texas should go independent and make its own way, he said with a chuckle, "Yeah, you're right. We're powerful."


Does Lane Kiffen work for Texas now? Sounds just like his "In our mind, our fans and everyone involved in the USC program, that USC is an extremely powerful place. It's an extremely powerful university. It's an extremely powerful football program."
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55375 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:09 pm to
Is anybody suprised by this?
Posted by mtnhighTiger
Scottsdale, AZ
Member since Jan 2010
4355 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Is anybody suprised by this?


Not I, said the Cat.

Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:19 pm to
If Texas tried to join the Pac-10 or SEC right now, do you think either conference would let them in? I think they may have poisoned the well.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
64533 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:21 pm to
Pac-10 might, but I would hope the SEC would just say no.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:27 pm to
I don't know.... the leaked Pac-10 quote about the 11th Hour changes demanded by Texas just seethed bitterness. They might be done as well.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80063 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:29 pm to
Not one conference in the country would turn UT away.

They bring in the entire state of Texas to a TV deal. Too much money to be gained by that.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:34 pm to
In the last 39 year, Texs has a grand total of ONE national chammpioship. The following schools have more:

Alabama- 5
Miami- 5
Nebraska- 4
Oklahoma- 4
Florida- 3
Notre Dame- 3
USC- 3
FSU- 2
LSU- 2
Penn State- 2

Schools that also have ONE title in that time:

Georgia
Georgia Tech
Clemson
Ohio State
Michigan
BYU
Washington
Colrado

Goor lord Texas, with all that money and recruits you have at your disposal and your natural built in superiority, how is it that you have the same amount of titles the last 39 years as Georgia Tech, Clemson and BYU? Hell, your tied with Colorado for THIRD in your own damn conference with colrado behind Nebraska (who had the good sense to bolt) and Oklahoma? Thats just pathetic.
This post was edited on 6/16/10 at 5:43 pm
Posted by 985TigerSaint
Member since Mar 2009
1704 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Not one conference in the country would turn UT away.


This is the correct answer.

As much as we may hate them, they have alot to offer the conference in terms of dollars and cents.
Posted by GABlueDog
Marietta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
8045 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

secfan123


You forgot a school on that list.
Posted by 985TigerSaint
Member since Mar 2009
1704 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

You forgot a school on that list.


He forgot a couple schoools on that list, but you get the point.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

He forgot a couple schoools on that list, but you get the point.


Fixed
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

In the last 39 year, Texs has a grand total of ONE national chammpioship.

Why an odd number like 39? Why not 40 or 45? Could it be that would negate your rant?

Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:50 pm to
Actually, it is 1 in 40. But, yes, beware arbitrary endpoints: 2 in 41 years. Still, Texas won three national titles in a 10 year period, and only one over the rest of their existence. Texas has the same number of recognized national titles as LSU (we don't claim 1908, but it is recognized by the College Football Encyclopedia). Texas is clearly on a tier below the truly elite: USC, Notre Dame, and Bama. And they probably rank behind Nebraska and OU, historically. Texas and LSU are peers.
Posted by GABlueDog
Marietta, GA
Member since Dec 2008
8045 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Texas and LSU are peers.


Didn't you read?

UT only has one peer...Notre Dame.

Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80063 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 6:20 pm to
I would say that UT has the largest TV audience in a big city that actually cares about college football
Posted by LSUbase13
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Member since Mar 2008
15060 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Actually, it is 1 in 40. But, yes, beware arbitrary endpoints: 2 in 41 years. Still, Texas won three national titles in a 10 year period, and only one over the rest of their existence. Texas has the same number of recognized national titles as LSU (we don't claim 1908, but it is recognized by the College Football Encyclopedia). Texas is clearly on a tier below the truly elite: USC, Notre Dame, and Bama. And they DO rank behind Nebraska and OU, historically. Texas and LSU are peers.


fify. I agree with everything else you wrote too.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 6:29 pm to
In order to join the SEC, Texas would have to agree to equal revenue sharing. They will never come.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram