- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Texas A&M Rivals Mod's
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:04 am
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:04 am
Still says its SEC bound along with the University of Missouri.
"Just talked to Gabe from the Missouri site and they have been told by what they consider VERY good sources that not only did A&M get what they wanted from the SEC, but the suggestion has been made that Missouri be SEC team 14. They're also saying the Big 12 concept is gaining steam and that they will not make a move on their own. In other words, they're waiting on A&M to split."
"Just talked to Gabe from the Missouri site and they have been told by what they consider VERY good sources that not only did A&M get what they wanted from the SEC, but the suggestion has been made that Missouri be SEC team 14. They're also saying the Big 12 concept is gaining steam and that they will not make a move on their own. In other words, they're waiting on A&M to split."
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:06 am to CatahoulaTigers
I like it, but doubt it.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:06 am to CatahoulaTigers
From Kansas City Star
One of those “other conferences” A&M has talked to is the SEC. And overnight, on several SEC-related Internet sites, Missouri has been put forth as a possible candidate to join A&M in making the SEC a 14-team league.
Missouri officials refused to confirm or deny any validity to that speculation, with MU chancellor Brady Deaton on Sunday night repeatedly saying Missouri was devoted to making sure the Big 12 -- even without Colorado (Pac-10) and Nebraska (Big Ten) -- remains a viable conference.
LINK
One of those “other conferences” A&M has talked to is the SEC. And overnight, on several SEC-related Internet sites, Missouri has been put forth as a possible candidate to join A&M in making the SEC a 14-team league.
Missouri officials refused to confirm or deny any validity to that speculation, with MU chancellor Brady Deaton on Sunday night repeatedly saying Missouri was devoted to making sure the Big 12 -- even without Colorado (Pac-10) and Nebraska (Big Ten) -- remains a viable conference.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 11:08 am
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:08 am to CatahoulaTigers
A&M I can believe.
Mizzou? That's more of a stretch. I don't think that the St. Louis and KC markets are worth THAT much to us.
Mizzou? That's more of a stretch. I don't think that the St. Louis and KC markets are worth THAT much to us.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:08 am to CatahoulaTigers
Adding TV markets = more $$$$.
They will eventually add two more in the East to go to 16:
VT and..?
They will eventually add two more in the East to go to 16:
VT and..?
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:08 am to bayou2003
3 Tigers in the SEC... we need to change our name to "Bayou Bengals" officially.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:09 am to CatahoulaTigers
Mizzou is a possibility. I don't really wantthem, but I understand the attraction: TV markets and still a southern state, but with a midwest pull.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:16 am to Baloo
quote:
I don't really wantthem,
me neither, but Glenn Guilbeau will be estatic if Mizzou comes aboard.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:17 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
They will eventually add two more in the East to go to 16:
If they are going to eventually be at 16, they should just go ahead. If they take Missou and A&M, they would have to realign the divisions. Then, if they added 2 in the east at a later date, they would need to realign again. Bama, Auburn, and Vandy (or whomever was involved in the realignments) are going to get tired of switching divisions.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:19 am to CatahoulaTigers
Mizzou to the SEC? no way.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:19 am to BhamTigah
I do, however, like the realigned divisions if A&M and Missou come aboard and we leave it at 14.
West
Missou
A&M
Arkansas
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Vandy
East
Bama
Auburn
Tennessee
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
South Carolina
I like our chances to get to Atlanta 4 out of 5 years.
West
Missou
A&M
Arkansas
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Vandy
East
Bama
Auburn
Tennessee
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
South Carolina
I like our chances to get to Atlanta 4 out of 5 years.
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 11:21 am
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:21 am to ColdDuck
quote:
we need to change our name to "Bayou Bengals" officially
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:24 am to BhamTigah
No way would they throw Bama and Auburn to the east while Vandy comes over with Ole Miss and State. That's not even close to fair to those teams in the east.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:25 am to One Story House
Really, I've never heard an actual LSU fan use the term "Bayou Bengals" in a serious manner.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:27 am to LSUJuice
quote:
No way would they throw Bama and Auburn to the east while Vandy comes over with Ole Miss and State. That's not even close to fair to those teams in the east.
The bigger conference would finally put an end to the constant opponent from the other division. The only way to play the Iron Bowl, Bama Tenn, and UGA Aub games every year is to put them all together. It'll be up to those four teams to decide if they want their traditions or competitive balance.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:29 am to yungtigr
I would think you would have to go North/South on the divisions.
South
aTm
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Bama
Auburn
Fla
North
UGA
USC
Mizzou
Vandy
Tenn
Kentucky
Arkansas
South
aTm
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Bama
Auburn
Fla
North
UGA
USC
Mizzou
Vandy
Tenn
Kentucky
Arkansas
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:29 am to Bubba Hotep
I don't really see how the divisions could be fair if A&M and Mizzou both join the SEC. The only way would be to break up Alabama and Auburn, which won't happen, or add two more schools to the east, which I think is unlikely in the near future.
I think A&M could eventually become very strong in the west, but it's going to take time. In the meantime, LSU would win the SECW most years, especially if they get rid of Les.
I think A&M could eventually become very strong in the west, but it's going to take time. In the meantime, LSU would win the SECW most years, especially if they get rid of Les.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:31 am to robg1124
If we have Missouri and A&M, Florida HAS to get over it and permit FSU or Miami to join the conference.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:33 am to robg1124
quote:
would think you would have to go North/South on the divisions
Then, the South is even stronger than the East would have been in the other scenario.
Popular
Back to top

8








