- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

WOW!! Colt McCoy?????? Really!???
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:36 am
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:36 am
quote:
NFL Network's Mike Mayock came away from Texas' Wednesday Pro Day with the feeling that Colt McCoy is "a solid second-round quarterback."
ESPN's Todd McShay observed that McCoy's intermediate accuracy was lacking, while Mayock said McCoy showed enough arm to "drive" the ball on comebacks and in-breaking routes. As a prospect, McCoy's best comparison in recent years is Kevin Kolb. McShay expects McCoy to appeal to the Saints.
LINK
Really!? This would be really stupid!!!!!!!! IMHO
This post was edited on 4/1/10 at 7:42 am
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:42 am to Meateye
If he can be our Matt Schaub, sure.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:44 am to Sophandros
quote:Yeah buy use a second round on him when we need other things worse? Dont get me wrong I think McCoy will be a great QB but do we really need this now? Drew has at least 6-7 years left in him
If he can be our Matt Schaub, sure.
This post was edited on 4/1/10 at 7:45 am
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:45 am to Meateye
quote:
Todd McShay
This guy is becoming more comical with each passing day. I truly hoped that McShay would be relevant and replace Mr. Bouffant Hairdo as the leading draft analyst at ESPN, but that just isn't going to happen.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:45 am to Meateye
Not so stupid. Quality backup QB's are a valuable commodity. Also could put Saints in an enviable position for draft day trade of last pick in 1st round to drop down a few spots and gain additional draft picks. Teams with QB needs might be anxious to drat McCoy early at the end of the 1st day to get a leg up on Round 2 McCoy pursuers.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:51 am to charlieg14
quote:
Not so stupid.
Your scenario rests on the concept of some team trading to get McCoy...which makes sense.
McShay is saying that "McCoy would appeal to the Saints". That means the Saints would have to use the first pick to get him. No one has said McCoy will last until the 64th pick.
Do you think we pick him at 32? I don't.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 7:57 am to adono
adono has the reasoning right. McCoy definitely not at #32 and definitely gone before #64. I'll just chime in to say I rate McShay as very bad of all the draftniks. He's just a pretty boy talking head that tries to stir reaction. Kiper wasn't an all star but his heir apparent is another step in Disney's continued downgrade of espn from sports to entertainment. It's the TMZ of sports. Watch it only when all else fails.
John Skelton or Jevan Snead 4th Rd or later I wouldn't mind as a developmental backup.
John Skelton or Jevan Snead 4th Rd or later I wouldn't mind as a developmental backup.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:00 am to adono
Not at 32, but if the Saints did trade # 32 to drop down and gain picks, I would grab him in the 2nd round in the 40-50 range.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:13 am to charlieg14
quote:
Not at 32, but if the Saints did trade # 32 to drop down and gain picks, I would grab him in the 2nd round in the 40-50 range.
There is no way in hell that we use our first pick on a QB...absolutely no way. We have serious needs on defense and Payton will not piss Williams off by picking a potential backup QB over defensive help.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:37 am to adono
Not at 32, but if the Saints did trade # 32 to drop down and gain picks, I would grab him in the 2nd round in the 40-50 range.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saints are not one defensive injury away from doom, but they ARE one offensive injury away from OBLIVION: Drew Brees.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
There is no way in hell that we use our first pick on a QB...absolutely no way. We have serious needs on defense and Payton will not piss Williams off by picking a potential backup QB over defensive help.
Saints are not one defensive injury away from doom, but they ARE one offensive injury away from OBLIVION: Drew Brees.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:40 am to charlieg14
quote:
Saints are not one defensive injury away from doom, but they ARE one offensive injury away from OBLIVION: Drew Brees.
And you think McCoy changes that fact?
If it was a major concern for the FO, they'd be in the McNabb chase. Now that would erase that concern and it could be done for a first rounder.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:44 am to charlieg14
quote:
Saints are not one defensive injury away from doom, but they ARE one offensive injury away from OBLIVION: Drew Brees
It's a season write off if he goes down seriously- regardless of who is behind him. Not worth 1st-3rd Rd investment money when you are contending and trying to repeat. A later round project would be reasonable moneywise and according to need. Go Skelton/Snead at #130. Brady or Matt Cassel were neither thought of as hot prospects but both thrived in the right system when given the opportunity.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:46 am to Meateye
I tend to disagree with you, Meat. While QB isn't a "need", it is a position that we can't wait too much longer to address. I'm in the draft a QB in the 2nd/3rd camp, because we do need someone to develop behind Brees (and someone good) for when the inevitable does happen.
I love the GB model. They had Hasselback on the team for a while, but Favre kept on rolling. So they traded him and got a 1st. Next up they drafted Rodgers, and he stayed for a while until Favre (ughem) retired.
The point is that they always had a top notch backup, and even though he never was used, they always recieved something for him.
Drew isn't young, and this is the time when you look to have your plan B always in the stable.
I love the GB model. They had Hasselback on the team for a while, but Favre kept on rolling. So they traded him and got a 1st. Next up they drafted Rodgers, and he stayed for a while until Favre (ughem) retired.
The point is that they always had a top notch backup, and even though he never was used, they always recieved something for him.
Drew isn't young, and this is the time when you look to have your plan B always in the stable.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:52 am to Midget Death Squad
quote:
I love the GB model.
see my New England model. I like it more
quote:
Drew isn't young
He ain't exactly QB old at 31 though. Even though not big he is quite an athlete and works tirelessly to stay in shape. I call 36 and early out for him. Push 40 if the O-line continues to protect him as well as it has. So, the next guy in line ala Rodgers I think is premature. Go developmental like Cassel.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 8:57 am to blueslover
McShay is a genuine idiot.
Before the season he said Snead would be a way better QB than McCoy.
Before the season he said Snead would be a way better QB than McCoy.
This post was edited on 4/1/10 at 9:00 am
Posted on 4/1/10 at 9:03 am to Midget Death Squad
quote:
I love the GB model. They had Hasselback on the team for a while, but Favre kept on rolling. So they traded him and got a 1st. Next up they drafted Rodgers, and he stayed for a while until Favre (ughem) retired.
And before that, they developed Aaron Brooks and then traded him to us. [insert evil laugh]
We don't need a QB to replace Drew if he goes down for the season. What we do need is a quality backup who could fill in reasonably well if twists an ankle or sprains a knee and has to miss a few games. Put me in the "after the 3rd round" camp on this one.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 9:12 am to GOP_Tiger
Why doesnt anybody believe Chase Daniel could be good one day? Am I missing something? He seems pretty promising to me. Maybe Im wrong 

Posted on 4/1/10 at 9:15 am to blueslover
quote:
see my New England model. I like it more
I don't, because it's rare to find those "steals" late in the draft. Cassel isn't any good, but he had a decent year on a team loaded with talent that even J-Russ would look good on.
Other than Brady, they haven't had a good QB that they drafted.
quote:
He ain't exactly QB old at 31 though. Even though not big he is quite an athlete and works tirelessly to stay in shape. I call 36 and early out for him. Push 40 if the O-line continues to protect him as well as it has. So, the next guy in line ala Rodgers I think is premature.
I am not saying Drew is old. I think he can play till 40. However, you can't afford to take chances with that. Once you are post 30, the body doesn't heal as well or take punishment the way it did pre 30. I think regardless of whether or not Drew is playing till 34 or 40, this is the time in which you have a quality backup that is there as a just in case. If Drew is still playing well once this backup's rookie contract is in its final year, then you trade him, ala GB and NE. Using the draft to both solidify depth of your team as well as setup yourself for future drafts is a good policy imo.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 9:16 am to charlieg14
quote:
Not so stupid. Quality backup QB's are a valuable commodity. Also could put Saints in an enviable position for draft day trade of last pick in 1st round to drop down a few spots and gain additional draft picks. Teams with QB needs might be anxious to drat McCoy early at the end of the 1st day to get a leg up on Round 2 McCoy pursuers
This.
Posted on 4/1/10 at 9:20 am to Midget Death Squad
quote:I dont think its possible for him to look good
I don't, because it's rare to find those "steals" late in the draft. Cassel isn't any good, but he had a decent year on a team loaded with talent that even J-Russ would look good on.

quote:
Other than Brady, they haven't had a good QB that they drafted.
I really dont think he would be worth a shite anywhere else
I do agree with what youre saying over all though
Popular
Back to top
