- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mickey Loomis: Good or Bad?
Posted on 12/31/09 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 12/31/09 at 5:32 pm
Has Loomis finally proven that he's one of the best in the business?
Or is the jury still out?
Or is the jury still out?
Posted on 12/31/09 at 5:36 pm to Champagne
ummm....I'm gonna say good
Posted on 12/31/09 at 5:50 pm to Brandon the Tiger
Back in 2000, I wanted the Saints to obtain Bill Polian by any means necessary. We got Loomis in 2002, and, he seems to be doing very well for us.
The Saints need and deserve a GREAT General Manager.
I hope that Mickey Loomis can help keep the Saints on top.
The Saints need and deserve a GREAT General Manager.
I hope that Mickey Loomis can help keep the Saints on top.
Posted on 12/31/09 at 5:52 pm to Champagne
Well I couldn't have complained at all with Polian, obviously. Loomis has done well though...Drew, Colston, Greer, Sharper, Vilma, Shockey, Evans, Nicks...He got all of those guys, and that's only a small percentage. I'd say he's one of the better ones.
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:00 pm to F machine
Why do you beat hookers?
quote:
This is why I beat hookers.
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:03 pm to Champagne
One of the best in the business? No.
I'd say average to good.
I'd say average to good.
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:20 pm to goatmilker
quote:
One of the best in the business? No. I'd say average to good.
See, this is what concerns me.
I've never been completely sold on the idea that Mickey Loomis is a great GM.
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:23 pm to Champagne
Mickey, I think, has become a very good GM.
Obviously, he's very, very good on the contract/salary cap side of things. However:
His best quality: He listens. He listens to scouts and his coach. He develops a plan for the team with his head coach and gives the HC the pieces he needs.
I think Loomis has done A LOT better than I expected him to do.
Obviously, he's very, very good on the contract/salary cap side of things. However:
His best quality: He listens. He listens to scouts and his coach. He develops a plan for the team with his head coach and gives the HC the pieces he needs.
I think Loomis has done A LOT better than I expected him to do.
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:25 pm to Champagne
quote:
this is what concerns me.
There are alot of first that have occured under loomis.
What are the negatives compared to past GM's you point to?
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:30 pm to Fun Bunch
Payton makes the personnel decisions, Loomis makes the financial ones
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:00 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Why do you beat hookers?
quote:
cause they're hookers?
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:01 pm to josh336
quote:No, Bobby insinuated this same thing on WWL in the preseason and Loomis sounded like he wanted to karate chop his throat.
Payton makes the personnel decisions, Loomis makes the financial ones
Loomis said all personnel decisions go through him
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:05 pm to eyeran
Loomis is good...I honestly don't see what some people are complaining about. He's put together the best offense in the nfl the last few years and has put together two of the best teams we've ever had.
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:05 pm to goatmilker
quote:
What are the negatives compared to past GM's you point to?
Saints GMs? Jim Fink and Mickey Loomis are the best we've ever had.
As for Loomis, I guess I'd be more confident if I were convinced that he's great at personnel evaluation and other issues that fall under "football operations."
What's great about Loomis in your opinion?
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:10 pm to Champagne
Loomis has negotiated every contract on the roster. What else do people need?
Is 14-2, 13-3 and a #1 seed not good enough?
Is 14-2, 13-3 and a #1 seed not good enough?
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:16 pm to Champagne
"I am real unclear on this whole good and bad thing."
Bill Murray in Ghostbusters
Bill Murray in Ghostbusters
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:35 pm to Champagne
Well...as any on here will tell you I'm not going to link facts that I already know. Hell...I don't even know how to. But the first coach to win 2 divisions the first saints team to win 13 in a row the first saints team to clinch home field. There's more 1st under loomis and SP than anyone in Saints history. Look it up. I'm tired of stating the obvious.
Popular
Back to top

5





