Started By
Message
locked post

College vs Pro Football Rules, what would YOU change?

Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:21 pm
Posted by real deal
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2007
455 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:21 pm
Ive always felt like some rules in college need to be applied to the pros and vice versa to make the best game in the world even better. Here are the changes I would make. Feel free to add your changes or ideas.

Pro Football Likes

-two feet in bounds equals reception
-down by contact, not down automatically when knee touches ground


College Football Likes

-maximum of 15 yards for pass interference penalty, not at spot of foul (ridiculous NFL rule)
-no "coachs challenge", done by booth upstairs at all times during game


If it were me, I would change all of those things. Both leagues would have down by contact, two feet equals reception, automatic challenges, and college pass interference rules.

What say you?

EDIT: also would change "illegal contact" penalty to not include the insane automatic first down on a 5 yard penalty. And finally, no "blow to the head" personal fould when the defensive player taps the helmet of the qb (ie hargrove in saints game vs bills)
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 12:24 pm
Posted by gizmoflak
Member since May 2007
11830 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:33 pm to
college: less strict celebration rules



NFL: clock stops for first down inside last 5 minues of each half; no 2-minute warning



ETA: yeah I agree with yours
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 12:34 pm
Posted by KCBasketball
Member since Dec 2008
3629 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:34 pm to
2 minute warning in college.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73847 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

-no "coachs challenge", done by booth upstairs at all times during game
there is a coaches challenge in college football
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
22023 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:40 pm to
Pro hash marks - eliminate ranters questioning "why the coach runs the toss sweep to the short side of the field?"
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55374 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:44 pm to
More strict taunting rules - No first down signals by players or dancing after sacks

Mandatory running kickoffs out of the end zone No downing of the ball
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
12995 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:47 pm to
I agree with the OP's suggestions.

I'd also like to see sacks not counted as rushing yards in the college game.
This is obviously distorting the numbers of LSU's powerful rushing attack.
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 12:49 pm
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:49 pm to
I would add that the hash marks be made uniform, and that all other rules are uniform, including game clock, overtime, etc.

For OT, I would only have it in playoff games. If you are tied at regulation, deal with it. You tied. In playoff games (not bowls, just playoff games), play an extra period. If it's still tied after that, play another extra period. After that, go to sudden death.
Posted by real deal
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2007
455 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:53 pm to
i know, but they dont have to call a coaches challenge to elicit a review by the upstairs guys

very few instances i can think of where a coaches challenge had to be used on a play that was overturned. most of the time, the guys on the field take a look at all the right plays
Posted by real deal
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2007
455 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 12:54 pm to
yes, very good suggestion, i hadnt thought about that

change hashmarks for sure. also, like another guy mentioned, i like the idea of clock stopping for a first down
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44116 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:06 pm to
I think that it is bullshite that in the NFL the defense cant score on the 2pt conversion. Their is no other play in the game that a team can't score.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60747 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:14 pm to
I like the 1 foot in bounds in college and 2 feet in the pros, seperates the 2.

I would allow the defense to return a missed PAT for 2 in the NFL.

I would get rid of the retard college OT and go to sudden death or an extra quater.

I agree about the spot foul PI, that is stupid.

I would also do away with the more subjective penalties, like celebrations. Don't want someone celebrating after a TD? Don't let him score.
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55374 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:17 pm to
How about acting like you've made a first down or scored before? Why do guys need to dance after a sack or for that matter, after every foul shot, do they need to pat each other on the back.

Do your job, do it well and don't dance like fool.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20996 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:19 pm to
I like some of the suggestions on here.

However between the 2 current formats, I actually prefer the college OT to the pro. I hate sudden death OT with a passion.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58827 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

-down by contact, not down automatically when knee touches ground


CFB should adapt this. i dont understand why a guy is down when no one has touched him. ive always hated that rule.

obviously the new nfl rule that DB's cant hit an unsuspecting receiver going for the ball is complete nonsense.
Posted by charlottetiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Nov 2007
7965 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

I would get rid of the retard college OT


College OT >>> NFL OT

in college I do not think the player should be ruled down if he did not go down by contact, how frustrating is it to watch the D of your team jump on a fumbled ball and not be able to stand up and take it to the house?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60747 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

How about acting like you've made a first down or scored before? Why do guys need to dance after a sack or for that matter, after every foul shot, do they need to pat each other on the back.

Do your job, do it well and don't dance like fool.


I don't disagree with you that its often lame, but it has no bearing on the game and is entirely subjective. Taking a TD away because some does a TD dance is retarded. But come on, these are kids, so they show a little emotion. Big deal, sorry if it offends you so much, don't be a pussy, it doesn't affect the game or you.

Remember an old Jets DE Mark Gastineau? He used to do some lame dance everytime he got a sack. They asked some OLman that gave up a sack to Gastineau what he thought. Dude said if I danced liked that everytime I knocked him on his arse, I'd be too tired to block.
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55374 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:36 pm to
Gastineau was the original jerk with the SSack Exchnage. I'm just Old School. it certainly is not a raial thing as I heard here before.

Butkus, Singletary and Jim Brown would do the job without the dance.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60747 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

College OT >>> NFL OT


College OT bastardizes the game completely, its takes out an important part of the game special teams and eliminates the impact of defense. Might as well just hve them settle it with a skills competetion.

Pro OT is vastly superior. Sorry if some team you root for sucks too bad on D it can't stop one drive after a kick off.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 9/30/09 at 1:39 pm to
Just play a full period.

And I would only have overtime in playoff games. If a game ends in a tie, you deal with it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram