Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Baton Rouge
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:455
Registered on:1/10/2007
Online Status: 

Recent Posts

Message
true, i believe most people are at least partially over estimating there strength.

however, not being able to bounce the shite (ridiculous how they let them bounce bench presses like that) out of 225 more than 9 times is embarassing for someone who is a professional athlete, weighs 230 lbs, and has been training specifically for it for the past two months.

and yes, i can bench much more than 225x9. and no, that does not mean that i think i am a better athlete than chad jones. it means i can bench more than 225x9

re: Who Will Start D-Line 2010???

Posted by real deal on 2/8/10 at 9:21 pm to
i think its

livingston
downs
nevis
agahyere (sp?)

I really like our starting DT's this year. I think one thing that could really take our D to the next level is a good rush DE. Hopefully one of these guys we have can step it up.

Personally, I have little faith in livingstons ability to do so, so hopefully someone can really stand out and make a name for themselves this year.
right on my man

I am very excited about the prospect of josh downs and drake nevis starting at DT this year.

IMO, the potential is absolutely there for this to be the best group of DT's we have had since dorsey left. Much improved from last year. Hopefully both can stay healthy.

In additoin, depth with guys from last year as well as copeland and ferguson give us a lot of flexibility.

I believe that this will allow us to see much more production from Chavis' D next year. No clue about the offense, but I expect our D to be cracking some skulls next year.

:geauxtigers:
quote:

our biggest loss in the draft


danny mccray

re: Teddi Bruschi on ESPN

Posted by real deal on 11/26/09 at 10:49 pm to
bah

no reason to believe they are a better team this year than we are. regardless, we will find out on monday night

on another note, did someone say TEDY BRUSCHI?

LINK
quote:

you pussies are like pavlov's dogs...when Tuberville rings the bell you begin to salivate and bark hysterically. you're a bunch of fricking sheep.


um no, not really

it doesn't take tommy tuberville to tell me, or most LSU fans, that our offense is pure garbage.

what he said can be considered many things, including inflammatory as you describe it. one thing that cannot be said about his comments is that they aren't true.
seriously, who cares?

why the lame appreciation threads?

he isn't here, he has nothing to do with our team in any way whatsoever.

i really wonder what the point of this is? :rolleyes:
the facts

-it was a terrible blown call which cost LSU the *opportunity* to compete for a game that was still up for grabs. the game is now over and nothing can and will be done about it.

-we have 2 more huge games vs ole miss and arky that we have to win this year

thats all that matters at this point, and we will see bama next year in baton rouge.
exactly, fujita being out was huge.

mitchel and dunbar were major liabilities during the last game. very poor on containment on the outside and were responsible in a large part for a number of turners big runs.

we need fujita back
i love the 600 section personally.

the fans are awesome, people encourage you to stand up, not complain about it, and its just a rowdy atmosphere

as far as watching the game, i prefer the higher seats because i can seee the field better and watch plays develop.

i love the 600 section, go for it man!
um no it doesnt

ridley doesnt play either unless its garbage time

scott starts, gets the majority of the carries and he is a senior

re: LSU 42 Tulane 0 FINAL.

Posted by real deal on 10/31/09 at 7:38 pm to
link to justin.tv for LSU?
no one makes perfect decisions all the time. and in a forum which caters to football discussion, it is perfectly reasonable for fans to discuss potential fixes for obvious problems with our football team

and keep the insults to yourself. the correlation you attempt to make between criticizing a football coach and someones future career is a poor one at best.

:geauxtigers:
you can easily make the counter argument that *because* we cannot pass the ball whatsoever, the defense can easily key on the run.

this in my estimation, is a main reason that the running game is worse this year than it was last year

id like to see lee get a shot.

re: Chris Garrett

Posted by real deal on 10/11/09 at 5:08 pm to
you = missing the point

our current quarterback is playing more like akili smith, so its only natural to give the backup qb a shot.

especially considering the fact our offense is ranked 109th in the country.

lee has talent, and i for one would like for him to be given the opportunity to show whether he has or has not improved since last year.

re: Why no Lee at QB...

Posted by real deal on 10/11/09 at 11:21 am to
haha exactly

like others said, at least we moved the ball.

our offense is way way worse this year with jefferson under center. he is not an sec quality talent and thats plain to see. its time to give lee some snaps
for me, its because he never stops talking

seemingly, he feels like he has to have something to say about everything.

he also latches on to some particular theme and will go on and on about it the entire game. like the georgia lb curran during this game.
nfl force out no longer exists. either 2 feet down or no catch
yes, very good suggestion, i hadnt thought about that

change hashmarks for sure. also, like another guy mentioned, i like the idea of clock stopping for a first down
i know, but they dont have to call a coaches challenge to elicit a review by the upstairs guys

very few instances i can think of where a coaches challenge had to be used on a play that was overturned. most of the time, the guys on the field take a look at all the right plays
Ive always felt like some rules in college need to be applied to the pros and vice versa to make the best game in the world even better. Here are the changes I would make. Feel free to add your changes or ideas.

Pro Football Likes

-two feet in bounds equals reception
-down by contact, not down automatically when knee touches ground


College Football Likes

-maximum of 15 yards for pass interference penalty, not at spot of foul (ridiculous NFL rule)
-no "coachs challenge", done by booth upstairs at all times during game


If it were me, I would change all of those things. Both leagues would have down by contact, two feet equals reception, automatic challenges, and college pass interference rules.

What say you?

EDIT: also would change "illegal contact" penalty to not include the insane automatic first down on a 5 yard penalty. And finally, no "blow to the head" personal fould when the defensive player taps the helmet of the qb (ie hargrove in saints game vs bills)