- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
real deal
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Baton Rouge |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 455 |
| Registered on: | 1/10/2007 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
true, i believe most people are at least partially over estimating there strength.
however, not being able to bounce the shite (ridiculous how they let them bounce bench presses like that) out of 225 more than 9 times is embarassing for someone who is a professional athlete, weighs 230 lbs, and has been training specifically for it for the past two months.
and yes, i can bench much more than 225x9. and no, that does not mean that i think i am a better athlete than chad jones. it means i can bench more than 225x9
however, not being able to bounce the shite (ridiculous how they let them bounce bench presses like that) out of 225 more than 9 times is embarassing for someone who is a professional athlete, weighs 230 lbs, and has been training specifically for it for the past two months.
and yes, i can bench much more than 225x9. and no, that does not mean that i think i am a better athlete than chad jones. it means i can bench more than 225x9
i think its
livingston
downs
nevis
agahyere (sp?)
I really like our starting DT's this year. I think one thing that could really take our D to the next level is a good rush DE. Hopefully one of these guys we have can step it up.
Personally, I have little faith in livingstons ability to do so, so hopefully someone can really stand out and make a name for themselves this year.
livingston
downs
nevis
agahyere (sp?)
I really like our starting DT's this year. I think one thing that could really take our D to the next level is a good rush DE. Hopefully one of these guys we have can step it up.
Personally, I have little faith in livingstons ability to do so, so hopefully someone can really stand out and make a name for themselves this year.
re: How can Copeland not start next year.
Posted by real deal on 2/3/10 at 6:58 pm to SammyTiger
right on my man
I am very excited about the prospect of josh downs and drake nevis starting at DT this year.
IMO, the potential is absolutely there for this to be the best group of DT's we have had since dorsey left. Much improved from last year. Hopefully both can stay healthy.
In additoin, depth with guys from last year as well as copeland and ferguson give us a lot of flexibility.
I believe that this will allow us to see much more production from Chavis' D next year. No clue about the offense, but I expect our D to be cracking some skulls next year.
:geauxtigers:
I am very excited about the prospect of josh downs and drake nevis starting at DT this year.
IMO, the potential is absolutely there for this to be the best group of DT's we have had since dorsey left. Much improved from last year. Hopefully both can stay healthy.
In additoin, depth with guys from last year as well as copeland and ferguson give us a lot of flexibility.
I believe that this will allow us to see much more production from Chavis' D next year. No clue about the offense, but I expect our D to be cracking some skulls next year.
:geauxtigers:
re: our biggest loss in the draft IMO
Posted by real deal on 1/12/10 at 7:10 pm to bayourougebengal
quote:
our biggest loss in the draft
danny mccray
bah
no reason to believe they are a better team this year than we are. regardless, we will find out on monday night
on another note, did someone say TEDY BRUSCHI?
LINK
no reason to believe they are a better team this year than we are. regardless, we will find out on monday night
on another note, did someone say TEDY BRUSCHI?
LINK
re: ESPN First Take Just Said LSU Has Worst Offense in the SEC
Posted by real deal on 11/20/09 at 1:19 pm to byubengalboy
quote:
you pussies are like pavlov's dogs...when Tuberville rings the bell you begin to salivate and bark hysterically. you're a bunch of fricking sheep.
um no, not really
it doesn't take tommy tuberville to tell me, or most LSU fans, that our offense is pure garbage.
what he said can be considered many things, including inflammatory as you describe it. one thing that cannot be said about his comments is that they aren't true.
re: Nick Saban Appreciation Thread...
Posted by real deal on 11/13/09 at 9:34 am to EZE Tiger Fan
seriously, who cares?
why the lame appreciation threads?
he isn't here, he has nothing to do with our team in any way whatsoever.
i really wonder what the point of this is? :rolleyes:
why the lame appreciation threads?
he isn't here, he has nothing to do with our team in any way whatsoever.
i really wonder what the point of this is? :rolleyes:
the facts
-it was a terrible blown call which cost LSU the *opportunity* to compete for a game that was still up for grabs. the game is now over and nothing can and will be done about it.
-we have 2 more huge games vs ole miss and arky that we have to win this year
thats all that matters at this point, and we will see bama next year in baton rouge.
-it was a terrible blown call which cost LSU the *opportunity* to compete for a game that was still up for grabs. the game is now over and nothing can and will be done about it.
-we have 2 more huge games vs ole miss and arky that we have to win this year
thats all that matters at this point, and we will see bama next year in baton rouge.
re: Anybody nervous about our run defense?
Posted by real deal on 11/5/09 at 5:33 pm to SwampDonks
exactly, fujita being out was huge.
mitchel and dunbar were major liabilities during the last game. very poor on containment on the outside and were responsible in a large part for a number of turners big runs.
we need fujita back
mitchel and dunbar were major liabilities during the last game. very poor on containment on the outside and were responsible in a large part for a number of turners big runs.
we need fujita back
re: 600 level seats any good to watch a home game in the dome?
Posted by real deal on 11/5/09 at 7:48 am to LSUTANGERINE
i love the 600 section personally.
the fans are awesome, people encourage you to stand up, not complain about it, and its just a rowdy atmosphere
as far as watching the game, i prefer the higher seats because i can seee the field better and watch plays develop.
i love the 600 section, go for it man!
the fans are awesome, people encourage you to stand up, not complain about it, and its just a rowdy atmosphere
as far as watching the game, i prefer the higher seats because i can seee the field better and watch plays develop.
i love the 600 section, go for it man!
re: What has happened to Keiland Williams?
Posted by real deal on 11/5/09 at 7:34 am to Rustontiger43
um no it doesnt
ridley doesnt play either unless its garbage time
scott starts, gets the majority of the carries and he is a senior
ridley doesnt play either unless its garbage time
scott starts, gets the majority of the carries and he is a senior
re: LSU 42 Tulane 0 FINAL.
Posted by real deal on 10/31/09 at 7:38 pm to Come2Conquer
link to justin.tv for LSU?
no one makes perfect decisions all the time. and in a forum which caters to football discussion, it is perfectly reasonable for fans to discuss potential fixes for obvious problems with our football team
and keep the insults to yourself. the correlation you attempt to make between criticizing a football coach and someones future career is a poor one at best.
:geauxtigers:
and keep the insults to yourself. the correlation you attempt to make between criticizing a football coach and someones future career is a poor one at best.
:geauxtigers:
re: With our current defense, I'd rather have Jarrett Lee
Posted by real deal on 10/11/09 at 8:37 pm to south bama tiger
you can easily make the counter argument that *because* we cannot pass the ball whatsoever, the defense can easily key on the run.
this in my estimation, is a main reason that the running game is worse this year than it was last year
id like to see lee get a shot.
this in my estimation, is a main reason that the running game is worse this year than it was last year
id like to see lee get a shot.
you = missing the point
our current quarterback is playing more like akili smith, so its only natural to give the backup qb a shot.
especially considering the fact our offense is ranked 109th in the country.
lee has talent, and i for one would like for him to be given the opportunity to show whether he has or has not improved since last year.
our current quarterback is playing more like akili smith, so its only natural to give the backup qb a shot.
especially considering the fact our offense is ranked 109th in the country.
lee has talent, and i for one would like for him to be given the opportunity to show whether he has or has not improved since last year.
haha exactly
like others said, at least we moved the ball.
our offense is way way worse this year with jefferson under center. he is not an sec quality talent and thats plain to see. its time to give lee some snaps
like others said, at least we moved the ball.
our offense is way way worse this year with jefferson under center. he is not an sec quality talent and thats plain to see. its time to give lee some snaps
re: Danielson and LSU today on Finebaum
Posted by real deal on 10/6/09 at 11:04 pm to triplesauce
for me, its because he never stops talking
seemingly, he feels like he has to have something to say about everything.
he also latches on to some particular theme and will go on and on about it the entire game. like the georgia lb curran during this game.
seemingly, he feels like he has to have something to say about everything.
he also latches on to some particular theme and will go on and on about it the entire game. like the georgia lb curran during this game.
nfl force out no longer exists. either 2 feet down or no catch
re: College vs Pro Football Rules, what would YOU change?
Posted by real deal on 9/30/09 at 12:54 pm to blueridgeTiger
yes, very good suggestion, i hadnt thought about that
change hashmarks for sure. also, like another guy mentioned, i like the idea of clock stopping for a first down
change hashmarks for sure. also, like another guy mentioned, i like the idea of clock stopping for a first down
re: College vs Pro Football Rules, what would YOU change?
Posted by real deal on 9/30/09 at 12:53 pm to Pilot Tiger
i know, but they dont have to call a coaches challenge to elicit a review by the upstairs guys
very few instances i can think of where a coaches challenge had to be used on a play that was overturned. most of the time, the guys on the field take a look at all the right plays
very few instances i can think of where a coaches challenge had to be used on a play that was overturned. most of the time, the guys on the field take a look at all the right plays
College vs Pro Football Rules, what would YOU change?
Posted by real deal on 9/30/09 at 12:21 pm
Ive always felt like some rules in college need to be applied to the pros and vice versa to make the best game in the world even better. Here are the changes I would make. Feel free to add your changes or ideas.
Pro Football Likes
-two feet in bounds equals reception
-down by contact, not down automatically when knee touches ground
College Football Likes
-maximum of 15 yards for pass interference penalty, not at spot of foul (ridiculous NFL rule)
-no "coachs challenge", done by booth upstairs at all times during game
If it were me, I would change all of those things. Both leagues would have down by contact, two feet equals reception, automatic challenges, and college pass interference rules.
What say you?
EDIT: also would change "illegal contact" penalty to not include the insane automatic first down on a 5 yard penalty. And finally, no "blow to the head" personal fould when the defensive player taps the helmet of the qb (ie hargrove in saints game vs bills)
Pro Football Likes
-two feet in bounds equals reception
-down by contact, not down automatically when knee touches ground
College Football Likes
-maximum of 15 yards for pass interference penalty, not at spot of foul (ridiculous NFL rule)
-no "coachs challenge", done by booth upstairs at all times during game
If it were me, I would change all of those things. Both leagues would have down by contact, two feet equals reception, automatic challenges, and college pass interference rules.
What say you?
EDIT: also would change "illegal contact" penalty to not include the insane automatic first down on a 5 yard penalty. And finally, no "blow to the head" personal fould when the defensive player taps the helmet of the qb (ie hargrove in saints game vs bills)
Popular
2











