- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
40 Years Ago Today: The Scram Button was Pushed & the Vladimir Lenin Power Plant Exploded
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:15 pm
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:15 pm
The world's largest nuclear disaster began in Chernobyl in the Soviet Union
A crew not fully clued in on the test they were about to run and a flawed design set into motion a series of events which led to disaster
A crew not fully clued in on the test they were about to run and a flawed design set into motion a series of events which led to disaster
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:17 pm to rt3
I guess it’s time to rewatch the HBO series. Anyone who hasn’t seen it should, it’s fantastic.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:19 pm to Indefatigable
it is. so is the episode by episode podcast. I highly recommend consuming it in that manner.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:19 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I guess it’s time to rewatch the HBO series. Anyone who hasn’t seen it should, it’s fantastic.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:19 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I guess it’s time to rewatch the HBO series. Anyone who hasn’t seen it should, it’s fantastic.
I've watched it at least 4-5 times since it came out and it's good enough to do so. The only episode I skip parts in is where they kill the dogs.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:20 pm to rt3
dammit. now I’ve got at least 2 related videos to watch before bed tonight.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:20 pm to rt3
Bruh, linking a 1 hour video? Lol
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:34 pm to rt3
Positive void coefficient and graphite rod tips.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:39 pm to rt3
Commies running nuclear plants. 
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:48 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
Positive void coefficient and graphite rod tips.
Why is that bad in layman's terms?
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:55 pm to rt3
Man I was that can’t be 40 years ago. That was in 1986. Damn
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:56 pm to willeaux

This post was edited on 4/26/26 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 4/26/26 at 7:56 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Bruh, linking a 1 hour video? Lol
No one's forcing you to watch it
You can put it on while you're doing something else & just listen to the content since you seem to enjoy the show that it's critiquing
It's relevant content
Posted on 4/26/26 at 8:08 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
quote:
Positive void coefficient and graphite rod tips.
Why is that bad in layman's terms?
The reactor type having a highly positive void coefficient means at low power production, it has a tendency to surge in power, which can turn too much water to steam and cause a runaway. In really simple terms it means it is very temperamental when operating in certain situations.
The reactor had boron control rods used to control reactivity. When scram was initiated the control rods would be lowered down into the core to basically shut down the nuclear reaction. The problem was the control rods had large graphite tips. So during the scram the the tips went in first but unlike the boron which produces a negative scram (slowing and stoping the fission reaction) the graphite produces a positive scram where the reaction speeds up VERY quickly.
A RBMK reactor can be operated safely but it has less margin than western plants. The Soviet operators did basically everything wrong and produced a positive scram along with conditions that turned all the water to steam so there was nothing to moderate the fission reaction and it go boom.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 8:18 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
The reactor type having a highly positive void coefficient means at low power production, it has a tendency to surge in power, which can turn too much water to steam and cause a runaway.
quote:
The problem was the control rods had large graphite tips. So during the scram the the tips went in first but unlike the boron which produces a negative scram (slowing and stoping the fission reaction) the graphite produces a positive scram where the reaction speeds up VERY quickly
Thanks
Posted on 4/26/26 at 8:22 pm to Obtuse1
Not to forget that at the start of the test... there was an issue
They couldn't get the power to the level to where they wanted it to be to start the test so they did something outside of parameters to get the desired result
That was step 1
They couldn't get the power to the level to where they wanted it to be to start the test so they did something outside of parameters to get the desired result
That was step 1
Posted on 4/26/26 at 8:24 pm to Bestbank Tiger
The explanation at the end of the TV series is fantastic. Its worth watching the last episode just for that alone. Its a wonderful 20 minute nuclear reactors for dummies lecture.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 8:27 pm to Bestbank Tiger
I went back to find the best explanation I have ever seen on the subject. It is more detailed than most and more classroom-oriented, and it is an hour long so I don't expect hordes of people to watch it but if you are interested, it is great. It is one class out of the MIT Introduction to Nuclear Engineering and Ionizing Radiation course from 2016. While some may not be able to follow the math,* it is irrelevant because you get a detailed explanation from a technical level I think most can follow. I was so interested that after watching it I watched the full course although I am sure my retention is low.
Just accept his 1+1=2 since there isn't going to be a quiz at the end for us.
Just accept his 1+1=2 since there isn't going to be a quiz at the end for us.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 8:30 pm to rt3
quote:
That was step 1
It was an excellent example of cascading failures/errors. Pushed by the draconian Soviet system. (Almost) nobody wanted to be the one who was the reason the safety test was not done.
Posted on 4/26/26 at 8:32 pm to rt3
Dad was in nuclear as an engineer in the late 70’s and early 80’s. He had just gone back to fossil/hydro when this happened. Remember the news saying there were strong radiation readings in the air everywhere and the Russians were saying there were no issues. Dad looked and just said, “What have they done?!”
Popular
Back to top

12








