- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will the debate over disobeying illegal commands come into play?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:06 pm
On the off chance that Trump actually wants to follow through with his maniacal rantings, what happens if his subordinates just refuse to carry out the orders?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:07 pm to Powerman
quote:
what happens if his subordinates just refuse to carry out the orders?
They better be right.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:08 pm to theballguy
quote:
They better be right.
Sure. They're compelled to carry out legal commands. That is clear.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:09 pm to Powerman
Bridges and power plants have been legitimate targets in every past conflict. The military uses them for command and movement.
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:09 pm to Powerman
Well see, the guy sitting next to the Cent Com commander is a JAG, his job is to inform the commander if the actions are legal etc.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:10 pm to Powerman
90% of Trump criticism is always about things that haven’t happened
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:10 pm to Jbird
quote:
Well see, the guy sitting next to the Cent Com commander is a JAG, his job is to inform the commander if the actions are legal etc.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:10 pm to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
You peed a lot on hot electrical lines didn't you? That is the only reason I can think of, for you being such a gigantic vagina.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:10 pm to Powerman
Maybe a debate over these retarded posts will come into play.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:11 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
90% of Trump criticism is always about things that haven’t happened
I'm asking a question. It's hypothetical. It is not criticism of Trump.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:12 pm to Powerman
quote:
Will the debate over disobeying illegal commands come into play?
I think the more important question is will Dems find a cure for TDS anytime soon?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:12 pm to Powerman
That’s a lot of words to describe you would disobey orders but let’s be honest I doubt they are deploying lesbian national guardsmen so you would be safe!!
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:12 pm to Powerman
quote:
It is not criticism of Trump.
quote:
On the off chance that Trump actually wants to follow through with his maniacal rantings, what happens if his subordinates just refuse to carry out the orders?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:12 pm to Powerman
Refusing to obey presidential orders is a federal crime. And power plants can still qualify as military targets.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:13 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
And power plants can still qualify as military targets.
What about desalination plants?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:14 pm to Powerman
Here's another little tidbit for you, that JAG also makes a determination on the types of munitions used.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:15 pm to Jbird
Useful information
Turns out you actually can make meaningful contributions here. You should do it more often.
Turns out you actually can make meaningful contributions here. You should do it more often.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:16 pm to Powerman
quote:
Useful information
Turns out you actually can make meaningful contributions here. You should do it more often.
I wish you would give it a shot yourself
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:17 pm to Powerman
quote:Usually you don't warrant any effort PowerMullah.
Turns out you actually can make meaningful contributions here. You should do it more often.
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:20 pm to Powerman
As a former JAG, let me help you a little. An “illegal order” broadly speaking is an order to violate the laws of armed conflict (consists of more than the Geneva Conventions). Bombing infrastructure is a common act in armed conflict.
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 1:21 pm
Popular
Back to top


9





