Started By
Message

re: Will the debate over disobeying illegal commands come into play?

Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:21 pm to
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173552 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

An “illegal order” broadly speaking is an order to violate the laws of armed conflict (consists of more than the Geneva Conventions). Bombing infrastructure is a common act in armed conflict.

Would bombing every last power plant, desalination plant, and bridge in the entire country be considered legal?

Serious question. That's obviously far beyond targeting only military capabilities
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
29223 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Refusing to obey presidential orders is a federal crime. And power plants can still qualify as military targets.


How about "destroying a civilization"? Is that a military target?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173552 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:38 pm to
quote:


How about "destroying a civilization"? Is that a military target?

Seems that would obviously be problematic

I don't know how you would even do that without multiple nukes

ETA - I don't think Trump is planning on using nukes before some idiot gets confused
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 1:39 pm
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8405 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:39 pm to

I have to be very honest here I seriously underestimated what an idiot you really are and that makes me sad
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram