- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will the debate over disobeying illegal commands come into play?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:21 pm to SpencerRob
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:21 pm to SpencerRob
quote:
An “illegal order” broadly speaking is an order to violate the laws of armed conflict (consists of more than the Geneva Conventions). Bombing infrastructure is a common act in armed conflict.
Would bombing every last power plant, desalination plant, and bridge in the entire country be considered legal?
Serious question. That's obviously far beyond targeting only military capabilities
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:22 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
Refusing to obey presidential orders is a federal crime. And power plants can still qualify as military targets.
How about "destroying a civilization"? Is that a military target?
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:38 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
How about "destroying a civilization"? Is that a military target?
Seems that would obviously be problematic
I don't know how you would even do that without multiple nukes
ETA - I don't think Trump is planning on using nukes before some idiot gets confused
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 4/7/26 at 1:39 pm to Powerman
I have to be very honest here I seriously underestimated what an idiot you really are and that makes me sad
Popular
Back to top


0




