Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why can’t we just have automated strike Zone on every pitch

Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:20 pm
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8897 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:20 pm
The ump wears an earpiece to tell him it’s a ball or strike


No appeal needed
Posted by Splackavellie
Bayou
Member since Oct 2017
12468 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:35 pm to
Probably the same reason Angel Hernandez had a job for so long.......unions.
Posted by SWLA92
SWLA
Member since Feb 2015
4934 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:38 pm to
South Korea has implemented that in their professional league. It also isn’t fail proof…
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Translator
Member since May 2025
775 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:45 pm to
I haven't watched too much MLB this season yet, but have there been calls challenged where the batter is walking off for a presumed ball-four count, and been right yet? I know that's often been an automatic with umps to call it a strike damn near every time.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29870 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:21 pm to
Technology can frick some shite up. I’ve watched baseball since I was 5. 35 years later, I’ve never thought that my team lost because of balls and strikes. There’s an artistic beauty in being able to paint a corner based on a particular umpire.

Well enough wasn’t left alone. Soon, every call will be relayed in an earpiece, and even if wrong, challenges won’t be available.

There were issues with baseball prior to this year, but balls and strikes wasn’t the main one.
Posted by Recognizable Poster
Geaux Tigers
Member since Mar 2026
168 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:33 pm to
Eventually I think it will. It's ultimately up to the owners to make the rule change. It's a delicate balance between the interests of the umpires' union, MLBPA, and the fans.

There are a lot of traditionalists that won't be amenable to the change. But as time goes on and newer generations of fans grow in numbers, I think it is inevitable. For example, many purists were against the pitch clock at first but have changed their tune after seeing how it has enhanced gameplay overall.

We shall see...
This post was edited on 4/1/26 at 11:38 pm
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4962 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:38 am to
quote:

It also isn’t fail proof


It doesn't have to be, it just needs to be better than humans eyeballing it, and it certainly would be.
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18305 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:05 am to
That's what I thought was supposed to happen. Is it still eventually supposed to take place?
Posted by Horsemeat
2025 Contributor Of The Year
Member since Dec 2014
15414 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:14 am to
Because automation is bullshite - some things need the human element for entertainment. What is needed is stronger accountability for shitty egotistical umpires like Angel, CB, Kulpa, etc. I miss the days of managers and umpires being belly to belly spitting in each others faces over bad calls in an afternoon game in early August where everyone is miserable working a game between two teams already out of the playoffs, but with everyone so hyper focused on gambling now those days are over. It's not about entertainment, it's about making money off the players.
Posted by msutiger
Houston
Member since Jul 2008
71916 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 6:32 am to
I disagree. I often think we are robbed of some incredible games because of the human element.

Example, runners on with one out, and all of a sudden the umpire starts giving a couple inches off the outside corner where he wasnt two innings prior. The first time that is called a strike it completely changes the mindset of the hitter. Now he feels like hes got to chase off the corner.

That isn't the game of baseball. That is a flaw in the game that we now have a remedy for.

This is desperately needed in college baseball. Strike zones have far too big of an impact on games
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
25567 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 6:50 am to
the thing about that Korean video is...a lot of those may have been strikes. I bet their system considers the 3D strikezone and some of those nicked the corner. Youd be shocked at what the path of the ball actually did compared to what your eyes and the vantage point we have is telling you.


Sure its also going to make mistakes sometimes, but i dont know if people are ready for what has actually been a strike this whole time and we just pretended it wasnt.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52673 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:21 am to
quote:

I disagree. I often think we are robbed of some incredible games because of the human element.

Example, runners on with one out, and all of a sudden the umpire starts giving a couple inches off the outside corner where he wasnt two innings prior.

You've yet to show where the game has been robbed. You only described a fantasy.
Posted by msutiger
Houston
Member since Jul 2008
71916 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:39 am to
quote:

You've yet to show where the game has been robbed. You only described a fantasy.


In the MLB hitters that have an 0-1 count the batting average drops below .200

When the count is 1-0 the general batting average is over .300

And that is just a general scenario. We can reasonably assume that when a count starts 0-1 because of an expanded zone that .200 average falls even further due to chasing pitches to account for a new and expanding zone.

You are asking to prove something that is unprovable but we can use statistics to show it can have a massive impact on a game.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
52673 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:00 am to
We want the human touch and all its quirks in my household.

Angel Hernandez, Bobby Cox, the pitcher throwing dots and catcher framing.

America!!!
Posted by KingofthePoint
Member since Feb 2009
11036 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

I miss the days of managers and umpires being belly to belly spitting in each others faces over bad calls in an afternoon game in early August where everyone is miserable working a game between two teams already out of the playoffs,

Umpires were even worse back then
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
19741 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

some things need the human element for entertainment


They can still be demonstrative with the calls. They are the only people that know the call in the ear piece.

Fans would be none the wiser. Calls on the edge of the strike zone can still allow the ump to hold dramatic pause and call strike 3.

Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
19741 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:17 am to
quote:


the thing about that Korean video is...a lot of those may have been strikes. I bet their system considers the 3D strikezone and some of those nicked the corner. Youd be shocked at what the path of the ball actually did compared to what your eyes and the vantage point we have is telling you.



Exactly.

Just because the catcher catches it well below the zone doesn't mean the ball didn't travel through the zone.
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
9894 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:59 am to
quote:

The ump wears an earpiece to tell him it’s a ball or strike



Just do it like tennis where the system announces a ball or strike.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
21466 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

That's what I thought was supposed to happen. Is it still eventually supposed to take place?

They need to fix the 2D vs 3D issue first. They were working with the 3D in the minors, and maybe spring training, but they were not liking the results in breaking balls and another pitch. So now they’re working w a 2D plane in the middle of the plate; which screws pitchers with a lot of late movement
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram