Started By
Message

‘The Bride!’ Is the Latest Example of a New Wave of Feminist Horror

Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:36 am
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59621 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:36 am
quote:

Maggie Gyllenhaal's "The Bride!" is part of a growing wave of feminist horror -- movies that place women’s autonomy, rage and control at the center of the monster story.

Experts say it’s part of a broader shift redefining who the “monster” really is. Scholar Barbara Creed says: “Instead of becoming an abject thing, the heroine owns it.”

quote:

The film’s ambition, in Gyllenhaal’s words, is sweeping: “a celebration of all of the parts of all of us that will not fit into the box that we’ve been told we need to fit into.”

“The Bride!” arrives amid a specific cultural appetite for stories like this, and not by coincidence. Guillermo del Toro’s recent “Frankenstein” reset the moral terms of the myth by building a film in which the creature never harms anyone who hasn’t first tried to harm him — every horror traced back to Victor’s choices, not his creation’s existence. Relatedly, “Poor Things” pushed Bella Baxter’s autonomy to its comic extreme. “The Substance” turned female rage into a grotesque spectacle and called it empowerment. Together, these films are doing something the Frankenstein myth has rarely allowed: placing the created woman’s interiority at the center, and asking what she actually wants.


quote:

Creed sees the current wave of feminist horror as the tradition finally catching up to that idea. In classic horror, the female monster was a cautionary figure — terrifying precisely because she exceeded her assigned role, and was punished accordingly. What she observes now is different: heroines who undertake what she calls a katabasis, the ancient Greek journey into darkness, and emerge transformed rather than destroyed, having claimed rather than fled their own monstrousness. “Instead of becoming an abject thing, the heroine owns it,” Creed says. “She becomes partly abject herself, but she embraces her monstrosity.”


LINK

It's off to a rough start, unfortunately. Anyone seen it yet?

Posted by CubanSaint
Member since May 2013
987 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:41 am to
It's wild that Warner Brothers gave her $80 million dollars to make this crap.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
37949 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:42 am to
It’s getting several walk outs apparently

Hard pass on this weird shite
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
18848 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:48 am to
Isn't it a musical?
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59621 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:50 am to
I think it has a couple scenes, but it's not a complete musical
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472312 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:51 am to
quote:

It's wild that Warner Brothers gave her $80 million dollars to make this crap.


Horror has been printing money lately. Sinners also got a similar budget, had similar progressive themes about oppressed populations, and grossed over $350M worldwide.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472312 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:52 am to
quote:

I think it has a couple scenes, but it's not a complete musical

I didn't even know that. Makes the Sinners comparison that much stronger
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59621 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Horror has been printing money lately.


They're so much cheaper to make, and it's attracting talented filmmakers. I am surprised that Zaslav signed off on giving 90 mil to Gyllenhaal
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37397 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:00 am to
Apparently it is a musical

Feminist horror is a term with meanings that may not be intended.

The idea of women being under represented in modern Hollywood is pretty rich. Just looking at the current slate of movies and you will find loads of action a horror movies with 120 pound women physically dominating much larg6men and monsters.

Right now we have Send Help, Scream, The Protector plus incoming Ready or Not and Undertone movies

I think there's already been a massive over correction
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
107241 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:00 am to
Love Buckley and Bale but it just looked like shite from the trailers. Also not really feeling the mob-era vibe with the stylization they’ve used.

That said, if we want to talk good feminist horror Companion (2025) was great and a better example of quality from that sub genre.
Posted by CubanSaint
Member since May 2013
987 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Horror has been printing money

Ok but it’s not a horror movie
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472312 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:04 am to
Companion is great and deserves a lot more publicity.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472312 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Ok but it’s not a horror movie


You mean scary?

With prestige horror also printing so much money lately, it's proven you don't need to be scary, either. Again, Sinners wasn't scary at all.
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 9:05 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114176 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:05 am to


Blah blah blah patriarchy blah blah blah
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
33769 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:35 am to
One of the guys on a podcast I listened to said yesterday it’s one of the worst pieces of crap he’s ever seen

And he’s a diehard Frankenstein and horror guy

He said he hasn’t been this disappointed in a long time
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37397 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:43 am to
quote:

One of the guys on a podcast I listened to said yesterday it’s one of the worst pieces of crap he’s ever seen

And he’s a diehard Frankenstein and horror guy

He said he hasn’t been this disappointed in a long time


Same

Very disappointed. I like the cast and wanted an interesting Frankenstein movie
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35022 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:48 am to
I swear I wouldn’t even know this movie existed if not for this board.

Did it get ANY publicity?

I imagine the studio knew it sucked and tried to bury it.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59621 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:58 am to
Fair point. It had little marketing
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472312 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 10:01 am to
I could be wrong but that indicates, as well as when it was released, that the studio knew it was a dog.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83054 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

had similar progressive themes about oppressed populations
I mean. . .how general are we taking this snapshot
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram