- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rep. Lauren Boebert offers some comments after leaving the DOJ Epstein reading room.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:51 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:56 pm to GumboPot
Must be some bad shite behind all the black Bondi boxes
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:56 pm to GumboPot
So, she didn't find any names that were redacted that weren't victims but she believes there are names that were redacted that aren't victims and she's going back tomorrow to find them?
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:56 pm to GumboPot
If I had to sit next to a member of Congress it would be Lauren Boebert.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:05 pm to roadGator
quote:
Must be some bad shite behind all the black Bondi boxes
Why doesn’t Thomas Massie read us all the names like he promised he would? He claimed he had 20 names to release.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:09 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
It’s looking like some evil stuff was being hidden for a long time.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:12 pm to GumboPot
From the linked X post:
Trump vetoed a clean water project for 50,000 people in her district as punishment.
Is this true?
Trump vetoed a clean water project for 50,000 people in her district as punishment.
Is this true?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:13 pm to Great Plains Drifter
No, it isn’t. It was a local project and not deserving of federal funding. I thought the Massie brigade like fiscal responsibility?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:15 pm to Riverside
The Massie crew only gives a shite about Epstein because they’re still holding out hope they’ll get OMB. Same strategy being used by the leftists. What a coincidence.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:17 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:15 pm to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
Is this true?
Yes.
Trump vetoed a bipartisan bill on December 31, 2025, that would have funded the completion of the Arkansas Valley Conduit, a pipeline project aimed at delivering clean drinking water to approximately 50,000 people in 39 rural communities in southeastern Colorado.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:17 pm to GumboPot
Should Congress fund the Baton Rouge water system next?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:17 pm to Riverside
quote:
No, it isn’t. It was a local project and not deserving of federal funding.
The bill had passed unanimously in both the House and Senate, but Trump vetoed it.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:18 pm to Riverside
quote:
Should Congress fund the Baton Rouge water system next?
No need. BR already has a water system.
For the record I'm for reasonable spending when it comes to spending on Americans. Not so much for the profligate spending on foreigners and Trump passes foreign aid ALL THE TIME.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:20 pm to GumboPot
Thank god President Trump vetoed the bill and exercised fiscal restraint. It was clearly a local project with no compelling federal interest. I thought Massie bros were all over fiscal restraint but I guess that yields when Epstein is concerned.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:21 pm to GumboPot
And did he ever offer any comment as to why he vetoed?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:22 pm to Riverside
quote:
Thank god President Trump vetoed the bill and exercised fiscal restraint.
I support my fellow Americans. I'm okay with my tax dollars going to infrastructure projects. It adds to the domestic economy.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:22 pm to GumboPot
What does she mean? Is she trying to say what Luna said about victims becoming co-conspirstors being the redacted names? Her wording is weird.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:23 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
And did he ever offer any comment as to why he vetoed?
IDK. You tell me.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:23 pm to GumboPot
Here’s a revolutionary take: how about local communities pay for their own water projects.
quote:
I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 131, the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act.
The Arkansas Valley Conduit (AVC) is a water pipeline currently being built to provide municipal and industrial water to communities in southeastern Colorado.
It was originally authorized as part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project in a bill signed by President Kennedy in 1962. For decades it was unbuilt, largely because the AVC was economically unviable.
Under the original plan, the costs of the project were to be initially funded by the Federal Government, but repaid by local users, with interest, over a 50-year period following completion of construction. But participants were unable to comply with that repayment obligation. In 2009, President Obama signed the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, which not only reduced the repayment obligation from 100 percent to 35 percent but also provided that miscellaneous revenues from the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project at large would count towards the AVC cost share.
Even then, however, construction did not begin until 14 years later, after the State of Colorado authorized $100 million in loans and grants for the project. The current bill would now have the Federal Government extend the repayment period (on the already-reduced repayment requirement) for an additional 25 years, creating a 75-year repayment period.
The bill would also cut the interest rate in half. More than $249 million has already been spent on the AVC, and total costs are estimated to be $1.3 billion. H.R. 131 would continue the failed policies of the past by forcing Federal taxpayers to bear even more of the massive costs of a local water project — a local water project that, as initially conceived, was supposed to be paid for by the localities using it. Enough is enough.
My Administration is committed to preventing American taxpayers from funding expensive and unreliable policies. Ending the massive cost of taxpayer handouts and restoring fiscal sanity is vital to economic growth and the fiscal health of the Nation.
For these reasons, I cannot support the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act. Therefore, it is my duty to return H.R. 131 to the House of Representatives without my approval.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 29, 2025.
Popular
Back to top


17





