Started By
Message

Rep. Lauren Boebert offers some comments after leaving the DOJ Epstein reading room.

Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:51 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139505 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:51 pm


This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 10:52 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156342 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:56 pm to
Must be some bad shite behind all the black Bondi boxes
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
11444 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:56 pm to
So, she didn't find any names that were redacted that weren't victims but she believes there are names that were redacted that aren't victims and she's going back tomorrow to find them?
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:08 pm
Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
6019 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:56 pm to
If I had to sit next to a member of Congress it would be Lauren Boebert.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
9251 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Must be some bad shite behind all the black Bondi boxes


Why doesn’t Thomas Massie read us all the names like he promised he would? He claimed he had 20 names to release.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:06 pm
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
Foggy Bottom Law School
Member since Nov 2013
48520 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:06 pm to
BOOM!
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156342 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:09 pm to
It’s looking like some evil stuff was being hidden for a long time.
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
9224 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:12 pm to
From the linked X post:

Trump vetoed a clean water project for 50,000 people in her district as punishment.

Is this true?
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
9251 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:13 pm to
No, it isn’t. It was a local project and not deserving of federal funding. I thought the Massie brigade like fiscal responsibility?
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
12664 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:15 pm to
The Massie crew only gives a shite about Epstein because they’re still holding out hope they’ll get OMB. Same strategy being used by the leftists. What a coincidence.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:17 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139505 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Is this true?



Yes.

Trump vetoed a bipartisan bill on December 31, 2025, that would have funded the completion of the Arkansas Valley Conduit, a pipeline project aimed at delivering clean drinking water to approximately 50,000 people in 39 rural communities in southeastern Colorado.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
9251 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:17 pm to
Should Congress fund the Baton Rouge water system next?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139505 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

No, it isn’t. It was a local project and not deserving of federal funding.


The bill had passed unanimously in both the House and Senate, but Trump vetoed it.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139505 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

Should Congress fund the Baton Rouge water system next?


No need. BR already has a water system.

For the record I'm for reasonable spending when it comes to spending on Americans. Not so much for the profligate spending on foreigners and Trump passes foreign aid ALL THE TIME.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:21 pm
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
9251 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:20 pm to
Thank god President Trump vetoed the bill and exercised fiscal restraint. It was clearly a local project with no compelling federal interest. I thought Massie bros were all over fiscal restraint but I guess that yields when Epstein is concerned.
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
12664 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:21 pm to
And did he ever offer any comment as to why he vetoed?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139505 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

Thank god President Trump vetoed the bill and exercised fiscal restraint.


I support my fellow Americans. I'm okay with my tax dollars going to infrastructure projects. It adds to the domestic economy.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
69723 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:22 pm to
What does she mean? Is she trying to say what Luna said about victims becoming co-conspirstors being the redacted names? Her wording is weird.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 11:23 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139505 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

And did he ever offer any comment as to why he vetoed?


IDK. You tell me.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
9251 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:23 pm to
Here’s a revolutionary take: how about local communities pay for their own water projects.

quote:

I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 131, the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act.

The Arkansas Valley Conduit (AVC) is a water pipeline currently being built to provide municipal and industrial water to communities in southeastern Colorado.

It was originally authorized as part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project in a bill signed by President Kennedy in 1962. For decades it was unbuilt, largely because the AVC was economically unviable.

Under the original plan, the costs of the project were to be initially funded by the Federal Government, but repaid by local users, with interest, over a 50-year period following completion of construction. But participants were unable to comply with that repayment obligation. In 2009, President Obama signed the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, which not only reduced the repayment obligation from 100 percent to 35 percent but also provided that miscellaneous revenues from the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project at large would count towards the AVC cost share.

Even then, however, construction did not begin until 14 years later, after the State of Colorado authorized $100 million in loans and grants for the project. The current bill would now have the Federal Government extend the repayment period (on the already-reduced repayment requirement) for an additional 25 years, creating a 75-year repayment period.

The bill would also cut the interest rate in half. More than $249 million has already been spent on the AVC, and total costs are estimated to be $1.3 billion. H.R. 131 would continue the failed policies of the past by forcing Federal taxpayers to bear even more of the massive costs of a local water project — a local water project that, as initially conceived, was supposed to be paid for by the localities using it. Enough is enough.

My Administration is committed to preventing American taxpayers from funding expensive and unreliable policies. Ending the massive cost of taxpayer handouts and restoring fiscal sanity is vital to economic growth and the fiscal health of the Nation.

For these reasons, I cannot support the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act. Therefore, it is my duty to return H.R. 131 to the House of Representatives without my approval.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 29, 2025.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram