- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Todd Blanche calls out Massie for grandstanding
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:34 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
You looked at the document. You know it’s an email address that was redacted. The law requires redactions for personally identifiable information, including if in an email address. And you know that the Sultan’s name is available unredacted in the files. See EFTA00666117.
Be honest, and stop grandstanding.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:34 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:37 pm to hawgfaninc
The Massholes aren’t going to take this well.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:46 pm to hawgfaninc
It's not Thomas Massie's job to do the DOJ's job
He's belaboring the point for a reason
the DOJ is not doing their fricking job, for their reasons
He's belaboring the point for a reason
the DOJ is not doing their fricking job, for their reasons
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:48 pm to Vacherie Saint
The DOJ could release all of the unredacted files and end this whole charade. Redactions should protect the victims.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:48 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
He's belaboring the point for a reason
No he's not
In that tweet, he is intentionally acting like doj is covering up stuff for the sultan when in fact it's already out there
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:49 pm to Cuz413
"The law requires redactions for personally identifiable information, including if in an email address." now i dont know the law, but assuming that this DA does, did you just ignore this part
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:50 pm to Cuz413
Oh stop.
So your contention is that Massie is justifiably lying to the public to make a point? GTFO
Massie got caught grandstanding…. Again
DWI.
So your contention is that Massie is justifiably lying to the public to make a point? GTFO
Massie got caught grandstanding…. Again
DWI.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:52 pm to antman123
Personally identifiable things are illegal to be released yet the name of the sultan wasn’t redacted.
Names are not personal identifiers?
Wild.
Names are not personal identifiers?
Wild.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:53 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
It's not Thomas Massie's job to do the DOJ's job
Stopped reading there.
*In Hagrid's voice: "Yer a fraud, Harry"*
It is being succinctly pointed out to your idol, that the redaction was made in accordance with the fricking law and that is the entire damn point of the thread. And is most definitely within the scope of the DoJ's 'job.'
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:53 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Be honest, and stop grandstanding.
Massie is not capable of doing this. His entire schtick is grandstanding, complaining, and doing nothing.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:55 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
The Massholes aren’t going to take this well.
They are an emotionally unstable bunch as shown by the poster below you.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:56 pm to Riverside
quote:
His entire schtick is grandstanding, complaining, and doing nothing.
Oh, didn't you hear? His crowning achievement is that he introduced a bill that would have created a literal utopia. The problem is that nobody gave a shite and it was never even brought to the floor.
He is a more feminine version of Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:56 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
The Massholes aren’t going to take this well.
That the DOJ continues to pick and choose what is released in the Epstein “hoax” files?
Most transparent administration ever right?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:57 pm to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:58 pm to PorkSammich
No. Thomas is now complaining because an email address was redacted according to the law.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 9:00 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
It's obvious that a lot of random, outlandish accusations are in "the files". They shouldn't "release" a bunch of crazy, random, obviously politically motivated accusations. If some random person accused some politician of flying on a spaceship to Venus and raping kids and killing puppies, it should not be released. This shite has gotten cartoonish. And has completely discredited anything in there that is probably true
Posted on 2/9/26 at 9:00 pm to Riverside
quote:
Massie is not capable of doing this. His entire schtick is grandstanding, complaining, and doing nothing.
Just read the names as he said he would.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 9:01 pm to hawgfaninc
And here is ANOTHER PROBLEM with what Massie is saying that these fricking idiots like Harry Frauder can't comprehend.
He cannot just name names. He needs to give actionable details.
Why? Because as anon points out, WE ALREADY frickING TOLD YOU THIS!
What happened about it? Nothing.
He cannot just name names. He needs to give actionable details.
Why? Because as anon points out, WE ALREADY frickING TOLD YOU THIS!
What happened about it? Nothing.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 9:02 pm to hawgfaninc
Blanche is the same guy that stood up there and said there was a lot of "abuse" stuff in the files, and that it would be redacted, and then said there was nothing there to warrant investigation. This guy is a clown.
Popular
Back to top


9








