- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
FBI concluded Epstein didnt traffick to Rich men, backing up Kash Patel's claim - AP
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:24 pm
LINK
FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show
Leer en español
Comments
NEW YORK (AP) — The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein’s bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world’s most influential people.
But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.
FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show
Leer en español
Comments
NEW YORK (AP) — The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein’s bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world’s most influential people.
But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 9:27 am
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:29 pm to RelicBatches86
lol.
Well if he says it I won’t believe any of the stuff I’ve literally read.
Totally not covering anything up, thanks Kash!
Well if he says it I won’t believe any of the stuff I’ve literally read.
Totally not covering anything up, thanks Kash!
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:31 pm to RelicBatches86
FBI concluded folks, shows over, go home
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:31 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:
U.S. attorney Alexander Acosta struck a deal letting Epstein plead guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution from an underage girl. Sentenced to 18 months in jail, Epstein was free by mid-2009.
Hmm

Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:33 pm to tyler925
quote:
I won’t believe any of the stuff I’ve literally read.
What did you "literally read" that indicates this massive sex trafficking operation?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:33 pm to RelicBatches86
I remember a news story years ago about how the video evidence from the initial FBI raid on Epstein island was “lost”. Where does this fit in? Was that even true? Am I remembering this correctly?
This post was edited on 2/8/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:34 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Hmm
Pretty sure Acosta unfairly got removed after the Epstein bros brought this up in admin one.
Although he's memorialized in this gif

Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
This is why those files should never have been released. Files emails without context do nothing but cause more conspiracy theories for Qtard types. I trust the fbi and Kash over some loon on the internet.
Massey has destroyed this country
Massey has destroyed this country
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:39 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
This is why those files should never have been released. Files emails without context do nothing but cause more conspiracy theories for Qtard types. I trust the fbi and Kash over some loon on the internet.
Why was this sender's name redacted?

Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:41 pm to RelicBatches86
Well, there it is. The man who was gonna get to the bottom of this mess has spoken......there is no conspiracy.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What did you "literally read" that indicates this massive sex trafficking operation?
Right. I mean, he self identified as the subject of a movie about a sex trafficker who owned his own private island and all, but that probably doesn't count in your world. I forgot that you like to argue that sex trafficking isn't real just like you like to argue that satanism isn't real.
This post was edited on 2/8/26 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:43 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I mean, he self identified as the subject of a movie about a sex trafficker
Epstein was a sex trafficker. Maxwell was convicted for trafficking girls to him.
That is the proverbial kernel of truth.
He brought up a massive sex trafficking operation, though. Not Epstein alone.
I'll ignore the super retarded parts of your post
This post was edited on 2/8/26 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:44 pm to RelicBatches86
Unfrickingbelievable.


Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:44 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I forgot that you like to arguing that sex trafficking isn't real just like you like to argue that satanism isn't real.
Or lawfare
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
Oh, I see. So now you're gonna argue the delineating values of sex trafficking. Someone throws out a number, that isn't "massive."
frick em. Just a few runaways, amirite?
frick em. Just a few runaways, amirite?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:46 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:Ongoing investigation would be my guess. That or its a Bush
Why was this sender's name redacted?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:47 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Oh, I see. So now you're gonna argue the delineating values of sex trafficking.
No.
I was arguing the scale of this purported sex trafficking.
quote:
Someone throws out a number, that isn't "massive."
However many times Epstein did it for his own sick gratification is irrelevant to a discussion about a larger sex trafficking network involving others.
Nobody is debating Epstein engaged in the pathology.
Popular
Back to top

24










