Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Despite the propaganda

Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:02 pm
Posted by DyeHardDylan
Member since Nov 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:02 pm
The world would have actually been a much better place if the U.S. hadn’t bailed out the British in two wars they couldn’t finish themselves. Should have let the Russians and Germans destroy each other and avoided the Cold War altogether.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23522 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

let the Russians and Germans destroy each other

That’s not what would have happened.

Option 1:
The British successfully keep the Germans out of Britain. Sometime in the late 1940s the USSR occupies all of continental Europe and north Africa.

Option 2:
Britain falls to Germany, then to the USSR. So the Soviets get north Africa and everything in Europe.


With option 1, the commies would have also installed a government in Ireland and Great Britain would be surrounded.
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 7:12 pm
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24208 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:17 pm to


Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81087 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:22 pm to

No doubt that world would have been better off if the Kaiser had won WWI.

Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35526 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:22 pm to
It’s probably just a tad more complicated than two sentences can cover. Maybe I’m wrong though.

Or perhaps put another way, if you find that just a couple of sentences pretty much covers your thoughts on the matter, then you probably need to start over from scratch.
Posted by SirWinston
Kid Rock sucks
Member since Jul 2014
103603 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Should have let the Russians and Germans destroy each other and avoided the Cold War altogether.


Germany would have won and everything would be better today
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 7:25 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
69733 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

Option 1:
The British successfully keep the Germans out of Britain. Sometime in the late 1940s the USSR occupies all of continental Europe and north Africa.

Option 2:
Britain falls to Germany, then to the USSR. So the Soviets get north Africa and everything in Europe.


Did you type a wrong word somewhere in here? Or is the difference between your two options a couple of years?
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24208 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Sometime in the late 1940s the USSR occupies all of continental Europe


A young Angela Merkel says:

“Be patient comrade; all will come to fruition in time.”





Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23522 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Or is the difference between your two options a couple of years?

The only difference is if Germany takes Britain or not.

Clarifying, Stalin might have been satisfied with taking all of Germany and stopped there, but not for long. And he might not have wanted African territory.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
89966 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 7:32 pm to
had somebody talked hitler into putting all his forces on the eastern front he woulda destroyed the russian commies. he had them on the run even without that until he bogged down in stalingrad and that terrible winter. then after attrition we easily take the krauts. so much for that. welp.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram