- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hot Take: It's terrible strategy to deport in solid blue states
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:33 pm
What good does working to deport illegals in Portland, OR or Minneapolis, MN do for our beautiful populist movement? You face rabid opposition, the states are out of reach anyhow, and the political bleauxback is definitely not worth it. We risk fumbling the bag nationally to deport 10,000 illegals in states that we will never win.
The political cost versus the potential reward in ANY city in any RED swing state or near swing state like Arizona, Nevada, Texas, North Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Tennessee is a much more attractive proposition.
NO rabid pushback from the locals. No national talking points for team blue. No negative headlines. Just deportation and beautification / improvement of quality of life for actual tax-paying Americans. Bonus that you're likely deporting Democrat votes in the process, making it easier to win in future elections.
The political cost versus the potential reward in ANY city in any RED swing state or near swing state like Arizona, Nevada, Texas, North Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Tennessee is a much more attractive proposition.
NO rabid pushback from the locals. No national talking points for team blue. No negative headlines. Just deportation and beautification / improvement of quality of life for actual tax-paying Americans. Bonus that you're likely deporting Democrat votes in the process, making it easier to win in future elections.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 3:35 pm
34
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:34 pm to SirWinston
Sounds like they’re doing both and can handle multiple operations at a time.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:35 pm to SirWinston
quote:
What good does working to deport illegals in Portland, OR or Minneapolis, MN do for our beautiful populist movement? You face rabid opposition, the states are out of reach anyhow, and the political bleauxback is definitely not worth it. We risk fumbling the bag nationally to deport 10,000 illegals in states that we will never win.
The political cost versus the potential reward in ANY city in any RED swing state or near swing state like Arizona, Nevada, Texas, North Carolina, Georgia, Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Tennessee is a much more attractive proposition.
NO rabid pushback from the locals. No national talking points for team blue. No negative headlines.
It packs the House seats in those lawless areas and gives the leftists control of the country.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:35 pm to SirWinston
SFP has been pushing this. It was naive when he said it and still is when you say it
Illegals will just move to states BP is not operating in
Illegals will just move to states BP is not operating in
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:36 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
Sounds like they’re doing both and can handle multiple operations at a time.
Why not take all the ICE agents in Minnesota and move them to Iowa and Ohio and Georgia and Texas and Nevada though?
Who cares about MSP and Portland? I live in Portland and I'd rather think strategically.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:36 pm to SirWinston
You assume it's getting negative feedback because that's what the MSM wants you to think. The silent majority approves. Who knows, this show of force might increase self-deportations.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:37 pm to stout
quote:
Illegals will just move to states BP is not operating in
GOOD! Then their kids will likely live in blue states as well and won't swing close states like GA and Florida in future elections.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:37 pm to SirWinston
What matters more? Politics or laws?
In a Republic it would be laws.
If the media is shaping your opinion, I would suggest the perception they present isn’t accurate, but certainly intentional.
Communist need demoralization to have their way. They use lies to arrive at that objective. Keep that in mind.
In a Republic it would be laws.
If the media is shaping your opinion, I would suggest the perception they present isn’t accurate, but certainly intentional.
Communist need demoralization to have their way. They use lies to arrive at that objective. Keep that in mind.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:38 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Hot Take: It's terrible strategy to deport in solid blue states
Are you under the assumption that the main reason ICE is in MN is to actually deport illegals?
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:38 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It packs the House seats in those lawless areas and gives the leftists control of the country.
We do not (nor will we ever) control any house seats in MSP, Portland, Los Angeles, Richmond, San Fran, Philly, Detroit, Milwaukee, etc.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:38 pm to SirWinston
quote:
GOOD! Then their kids will likely live in blue states as well and won't swing close states like GA and Florida in future elections.
And those blue states will get more house seats than red states
Are you stupid?
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:39 pm to SirWinston
It's become an emotional thing for people who consider that a loss.
muh fight silliness.
It's about feelings and virtue signaling more than facts and logic.
muh fight silliness.
It's about feelings and virtue signaling more than facts and logic.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:39 pm to stout
quote:
Illegals will just move to states BP is not operating in
Why aren't they doing it now in a way to affect the successful red states?
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:40 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
What matters more? Politics or laws?
In a Republic it would be laws.
strat·e·gy
noun
a plan of action or policy designed to achieve a major or overall aim.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:40 pm to SirWinston
quote:
We do not (nor will we ever) control any house seats in MSP, Portland, Los Angeles, Richmond, San Fran, Philly, Detroit, Milwaukee, etc.
Dude, do you even know how the allocation of house seats work?
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:40 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It packs the House seats in those lawless areas and gives the leftists control of the country.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:40 pm to SirWinston
It's very likely those blue states are blue because of election fraud. Do you believe that the majority of voters in those state really want to live in those dem run environments?
What is likely happening in those blue states is that the media is pounding it into the citizens heads that everyone want these crazy far left ideologies. The reality is that a small vocal minority wants it and the larger majority is being silenced.
What is likely happening in those blue states is that the media is pounding it into the citizens heads that everyone want these crazy far left ideologies. The reality is that a small vocal minority wants it and the larger majority is being silenced.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:40 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
What matters more? Politics or laws?
In a Republic it would be laws.
This doesn't make any sense and is based in the false premise that all laws are being executed equally everywhere right now (update: they are not)
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:40 pm to SirWinston
It's way worse not to deport there.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:41 pm to fwtex
quote:
It's very likely those blue states are blue because of election fraud. Do you believe that the majority of voters in those state really want to live in those dem run environments?
Um...yes? Why wouldn't they?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News