- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gene Steratore is useless and weak
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:22 pm
He automatically agrees with whatever the call in the field is. His work during the Bills-Broncos divisional game was laughable.
13
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:06 am to cbree88
Still a Member of the Union, drawing a pension, and every other Cadillac benefit known to mankind
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:15 am to cbree88
I had a good laugh when he went radio silent on the first DPI on the last Broncos drive
Posted on 1/18/26 at 12:39 pm to cbree88
quote:I'd be willing to be if you audited every call he opined on over the course of a season, his "automatic agreement" would be way less than 100%.
He automatically agrees with whatever the call in the field is
Posted on 1/18/26 at 1:05 pm to cbree88
quote:
He automatically agrees with whatever the call in the field is. His work during the Bills-Broncos divisional game was laughable.
The rules experts are my least favorite part of broadcasts.
The biggest reason is they don’t use them to explain the rules. They use them to evaluate a replay. And very often their subjective view is incorrect.
Steratore is bad. The college guy on the Herbstreet broadcast is just as bad.
This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 1/18/26 at 1:53 pm to cbree88
Every TV “rules expert” is trash. All they do is agree with the call and then twist their logic to accommodate it. It’s especially bad in college football.
They don’t help their profession at all nor do they add to the broadcast.
They don’t help their profession at all nor do they add to the broadcast.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 1:54 pm to moneyg
quote:
The college guy on the Herbstreet broadcast is just as bad.
His explanation at the end of the Fiesta Bowl was hot garbage. Literally telling people a lie.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 2:04 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Every TV “rules expert” is trash
For the most part I agree...although I can at least deal with Mike Pereria or Dean Blandino of FOX.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 2:56 pm to SpartyGator
Not exactly the same thing, but the ACC allowing broadcasts to listen in to officials reviewing a replay was fantastic. Showed transparency and allowed fans to see how officials arrive at a certain call. Way better than these useless dorks coming in for 20 seconds to say “Yeah, Joe, refs nailed it again.”
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:14 pm to cbree88
He’s a textbook cuck.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:17 pm to cbree88
The NFL must have forced the broadcasters to include him to diffuse outrage on controversial calls on their behalf. Its a disgrace to the game
This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:23 pm to cbree88
They ask him to chime in on onvious flags.
"Let's hear from Gene Sterstore on that flag. Was it a face mask in your opinion?"
We don't need Gene to tell us if it was a face mask. It was 1000% obvious it was a face mask.
"Let's hear from Gene Sterstore on that flag. Was it a face mask in your opinion?"
We don't need Gene to tell us if it was a face mask. It was 1000% obvious it was a face mask.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:23 pm to cbree88
Mike Perina usually does a good job. He disagrees with the field call pretty often.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 3:27 pm to cbree88
Here’s the guest referee playbook:
-if the call was obviously right, agree with the call
-if the call is controversial, give gibberish explanation why it could go either way
-if the call on the field is the same as what you said, pat yourself in the back
-if the call is the opposite what you said, agree with the call and give new evidence but in a way that make it seems hidden initially.
-if the call was obviously right, agree with the call
-if the call is controversial, give gibberish explanation why it could go either way
-if the call on the field is the same as what you said, pat yourself in the back
-if the call is the opposite what you said, agree with the call and give new evidence but in a way that make it seems hidden initially.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 4:43 pm to cbree88
His job is to uphold the officials calls and explain why you didn’t see what you saw.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 4:51 pm to cbree88
The NFL is an entertainment company, not a sports league.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 4:54 pm to cbree88
He’s still in the union. What do you want him to say?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News