Started By
Message

What is targeting?

Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:19 pm
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
129912 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:19 pm
I have no idea
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80187 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:20 pm to
No one knows.

It's applied differently in all cases.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
66701 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:20 pm to
Forcible contact to the head and neck area of a defenseless player is textbook targeting and the refs just overturned it. Both players got hurt on the play too
Posted by WhoGeaux
Member since Apr 2011
5494 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:20 pm to
Looked like the defender was trying to get to the ball to me
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
70372 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:20 pm to
Neither does the ref in the booth.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
66701 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Looked like the defender was trying to get to the ball to me


Intent has nothing to do with the call when it's a defenseless player.
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
18964 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:21 pm to
Just copy basketball, if it’s a hit to the head, whatever, it can be a penalty if you really want it to. If it’s obviously malicious like Vontaze Burfect or something, then it’s a flagrant and you can get ejected.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44385 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:29 pm to
No the rule is-

quote:

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet
ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting


there was no indicator- he didn't launch, he didn't crouch, there was no upward thrust, he didn't lower his head
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34391 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:30 pm to
the ref expert said it would be an easy call in favor of targeting.
after they said it wasn't targeting, the expert starts talking about the lack of an indicator
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 7:31 pm
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
71521 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:35 pm to
The defender’s crown was facing the roof when they collided.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
169722 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:37 pm to
Rule shouldn’t even exist anymore. So dumb. 15 yard flag and move on
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54042 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Forcible contact to the head and neck area of a defenseless player is textbook targeting and the refs just overturned it. Both players got hurt on the play too


Then we listened to the media official talk about looking for "indicators" which I've never heard before tonight
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
66701 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Then we listened to the media official talk about looking for "indicators" which I've never heard before tonight


Forcible contact is an indicator unless they changed their mind on that too
Posted by Juan Betanzos
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2005
4091 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:23 pm to
Touching another player
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
718 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:33 pm to
He was looking at the ball and they ran into each other. Not targeting when you aren’t even looking.
Posted by beaverfever
Arkansas
Member since Jan 2008
35661 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Forcible contact to the head and neck area of a defenseless player is textbook targeting and the refs just overturned it. Both players got hurt on the play too
The issue is that an incredibly ambiguous word like forcible is doing the heavy lifting here. It leaves the question, is all contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless player targeting? The refs just said no.

So we’re back to the OP’s point. What is targeting?
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80187 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:41 pm to
This is so dumb if called.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
39018 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:42 pm to
Im sure this will be... fricking bullshite.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80187 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:42 pm to
What is targeting?
Posted by pjnchamps
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2008
2067 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:42 pm to
Targeting....whatever helps Vegas agenda
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram