- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The MSM doesn’t want you to see it…bullet hole in windshield
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:21 pm
It obviously shows the officer was IN FRONT of the car when she tried to run him over.
It’s as clear cut as possible. Self defense.
*COULD he have just jumped out of the way? Sure. Was he required to? No. Fully justified in shooting.
It’s as clear cut as possible. Self defense.
*COULD he have just jumped out of the way? Sure. Was he required to? No. Fully justified in shooting.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:24 pm to sidewalkside
Seems like OP doesn’t want me to see it
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:25 pm to sidewalkside
I mean, i think it was justified.
But i don't think you have any remote understanding how a bullet hole works. Dude could have been at a 45 degree angle.
But i don't think you have any remote understanding how a bullet hole works. Dude could have been at a 45 degree angle.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:27 pm to j1897
quote:the bullet went THROUGH kennedy and hit connelly's wrist
But i don't think you have any remote understanding how a bullet hole works. Dude could have been at a 45 degree angle
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:28 pm to j1897
We need the resident bullet expert to explain to us. If the bullet was shot from the gun at a 45 degree angle from the drivers side, how did it hit the driver??
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:29 pm to j1897
quote:
But i don't think you have any remote understanding how a bullet hole works.
Good thing there is at least one video that shows the position of the officer in relation to the front of the vehicle.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:30 pm to W2NOMO
These people are playing a dangerous game.
Their leaders are encouraging it hoping for a death.
They got it. Let’s see how they run with it.
I don’t think it will end well for them.
Their leaders are encouraging it hoping for a death.
They got it. Let’s see how they run with it.
I don’t think it will end well for them.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:32 pm to j1897
There’s a video out there of the “war hero” of the left, Malcom Nance, saying that bullet came through the rear of the vehicle, went through her head, and out of the windshield.
All of you people are fricking retarded
All of you people are fricking retarded
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:32 pm to sidewalkside
Should have shot her in the accelerator foot.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:35 pm to j1897
quote:
But i don't think you have any remote understanding how a bullet hole works. Dude could have been at a 45 degree angle.
Since you are a ballistics expert, go shoot your windshield straight on with 9mm.
Now go shoot your wife’s boyfriend windshield at 45 degrees and compare the entries.
Did the front bumper hit the officer?
He could have dumped the mag and still be 100% justified.
If this lady was crazed enough to try and run over a federal officer just think what she may have done in a school zone.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:43 pm to Rekrul
Found the video, his remarks about the windshield bullet hole starts right around the 1min 10sec mark.
What a fricking clown that guy is
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:47 pm to Rekrul
I guess he's the same dumb frick that claimed that Charlie Kirk was shot from the back as well....
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:48 pm to Rebel
The agent was right handed. Kinda hard to shoot the windshield if he wasn’t in direct path of car. One shot through the windshield and then he skirted down the left side and shot twice more as car passed.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:48 pm to Rebel
quote:
Now go shoot your wife’s boyfriend windshield at 45 degrees and compare the entries.
They will be different, from a grainy arse video you would not be able to tell the difference.
It feels like you didn't even attempt to read the first sentence of my post before unleashing your boomer fury. I agree with the use of force.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:49 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Good thing there is at least one video that shows the position of the officer in relation to the front of the vehicle.
Where is it found? I know about a few people that need to see it.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:50 pm to Rekrul
I made it 55 seconds. Tried to make it a whole minute but would have ended up using pejoratives for a group of people
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:50 pm to sidewalkside
It does no such thing. In fact probably the opposite.
We know the 2nd & 3rd were excessive and the agent was in no danger when he got those off.
We know the 2nd & 3rd were excessive and the agent was in no danger when he got those off.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:52 pm to mwade91383
quote:
mwade91383
Man, never have I seen so many pussies who've probably never used a firearm in their life, become experts on ballistics like this!
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:52 pm to Rebel
.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 9:54 pm
Back to top

11








