Somalia crime family moves a Billion in cash through TSA, without confiscation.

quote:

---

But frick you

---

quote:

---

SFP says you can’t prove this

---

quote:

---

and to quit slandering his people and his candidate

---

quote:

---

I ran it through Grok and the entire purpose is to replace the populations of Western Nations with foreigners due to declining birth rates

---

quote:

---

In the absence of migration, the size of the working-age population declines faster than the overall population. As a result of this faster rate of decline, the amount of migration needed to prevent a decline in the working-age population is larger than that for the overall population. In the four countries where fertility levels are close to the replacement level, the resultant population in 2050 would have 8 to 14 per cent being post-1995 migrants and their descendants. In the other six countries and regions, the post-1995 migrants and their descendants would be between 26 and 39 per cent of the 2050 population. While some of these numbers may appear to be high, they remain within the range of migration experienced in the recent past in some industrialized countries. For example, in 1990, 16 per cent of the population of Canada and Switzerland, and 23 per cent of the population of Australia, were foreign-born.

In contrast to the migration streams needed to offset total or working-age population decline, the levels of migration that would be needed to prevent the countries from ageing are of substantially larger magnitudes. By 2050, these larger migration flows would result in populations where the proportion of post-1995 migrants and their descendants would range between 59 per cent and 99 per cent. Such high levels of migration have not been observed in the past for any of these countries or regions. Moreover, it seems extremely unlikely that such flows could happen in these countries in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it appears inevitable that the populations of the low-fertility countries will age rapidly in the 21st century.

---

quote:

---

The consequences of a much older population age-structure than in the past are numerous and farreaching. One important consideration that has been examined in this study is the potential support ratio (PSR). The current system of providing income and health services for older no-longer-working persons has been based, by and large, on an age structure with a potential support ratio of 4 to 5 persons in working-age for each older person aged 65 years or older. If the current age at retirement does not change, the PSR is projected to decline to about 2.

A decline of the PSR from 4 or 5 to 2 would certainly create the need to reconsider seriously the modalities of the present system of pensions and health care for the elderly. Theoretically, as noted above, a possible option would be to increase the upper limit of the working age sufficiently to attain a sustainable PSR. Such an option would simultaneously increase the numbers of working-age people and reduce the number of non-working older persons. Other possible options that may need to be examined thoroughly include adjusting economic measures, such as increased labour-force participation, higher contributions from workers and employers and lower benefits provided to retirees. Certainly, increased productivity in the future may increase the available resources from the working-age population. However, it is also possible that increased productivity may lead to increased aspirations and demands from both the working-age and the retired populations.

During the second half of the 20th century, the industrialized countries have benefited from population sizes and population age-structures that were the result of a history of moderate levels of fertility and low mortality. These favourable demographic circumstances made possible, to a large extent, the provision of relatively generous benefits to retirees at comparatively low costs to workers and employers. However, these age-structures were not permanent, but merely transitional. During the first half of the 21st century, the populations of most industrialized countries are projected to become smaller and older in response to below-replacement fertility as well as increased longevity. The consequences of significant population decline and population ageing are not well understood as they are new demographic experiences for countries. Keeping retirement and health-care systems for older persons solvent in the face of declining and ageing populations, for example, constitutes a new situation that poses serious challenges for Governments and civil society

The new challenges being brought about by declining and ageing populations will require objective, thorough and comprehensive reassessments of many established economic, social and political policies and programmes. Such reassessments will need to incorporate a long-term perspective. Critical issues to be addressed in those reassessments would include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health-care benefits for the elderly; (c) the labour-force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health-care benefits for the increasing elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular replacement migration, and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Mostly under Biden? Need dates for this alleged transport.

---