The dumbest talking point in the history of The Five not coming from the Lefties chair.

What in God’s holy name are you rambling about?

Her math makes sense.

Yea let’s just allow them to remain unchecked in America and receive years of SNAP benefits and tuition discounts like the Latina nurse who just graduated from LSU.

The LSU nurse 1) admitted to receiving welfare in high school 2) received Pell grants, TOPS, and minority tuition discounts, and 3) didn’t even have the decency to attend her immigration hearing.

When you rub it in our faces, it’s not easy to sympathize with her or anyone else who chastises efforts to deport illegals.

quote:

---

Gillian Turner

---

She most definitely is a lib. Get rid of her and jessica.

RFK I think you and I were both confused by reading the post, its clear when you see the video.

The post appears to say paying 3K makes sense because if not they will stay here and collect benes and it will cost us 14K to hunt them down.

However in the clip she is saying the 3K does not make sense and the other cast member is arguing it does for the aforementioned reasons.

quote:

---

3) didn’t even have the decency to attend her immigration hearing.

---

This is the sad fact in many of these immigration hearings. People that did not attend to their immigration court hearings. Plus the other details about receiving student aid, now would that be a function of the school and not her personally unless she had on her application that she was a US citizen and the school gave her those benefits without knowing she was an immigrant who missed immigration court hearings.


Was there no checks and balances between her immigration numbers and a red flag that would have been raised when she applied for government benefits. Also, another red flag should have been raised when she was set start working in a hospital, EVerify did not red flag when people miss hearings and loose their status.


Knowing all of this, if true, takes the sob story the media ran with last week and flips the script in that she deserves what is coming her way. Sad but true.

Those numbers are BS.

- now add catch and release costs
- now add detainment costs
- now add legal representation costs
- now add costs for immigration judges and court operations
- now add medical costs
- now add education costs
- now add costs to process those who commit crimes

In addition to welfare and Medicare/Mesicaid/social security/food stamps.

No way those numbers are right. And many of these costs are recurring.

quote:

---

RFK I think you and I were both confused by reading the post, its clear when you see the video.

The post appears to say paying 3K makes sense because if not they will stay here and collect benes and it will cost us 14K to hunt them down.

However in the clip she is saying the 3K does not make sense and the other cast member is arguing it does for the aforementioned reasons.

---

If she was trying to say the self-deport program ($3k) is going to be rife with corruption and it is going to cost way more than $3k, exceeding $17k, then she has a point. But she didn't say that.

Some of the other panel members pointed out some of the guardrails such as gathering biometrics to prevent such. I was wondering if they were going to put sufficient effort into preventing repeated crossings and getting $3k each and every time. But the biometrics prevents that.

At least the $3k isn't going to NGOs like under Biden.

However, what happens when the next Marxocrat comes into the WH and decides they too aren't going to enforce federal law and not a single judge will call them on it and they don't bother to check those biometrics?

Trump can't stop that. Congress can't stop that (because Marxocrats don't have to enforce federal law, only Trump). Only voters can stop that. And I think the mid-terms they are going to do the opposite.

Weird way of admitting you are an avid fan of the Five