- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
MLB Hall of Fame Jeff Kent to Cooperstown
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 12/7/25 at 10:42 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:22 am to Tackleberry
Dale Murphy not being in while Bonds and Clemens are excluded is a travesty.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:11 am to Tackleberry
I never once saw Jeff Kent and thought “that’s a hall of famer right there”
But Mattingly and Murphy, I assumed both were already in
But Mattingly and Murphy, I assumed both were already in
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:31 am to lsusa
quote:
Dale Murphy not being in
Crazy.
If he were an a-hole and the writers hated him, I could understand it.
But Murphy is the literal polar opposite to "a-hole"
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:34 am to Tackleberry
Does his dirt bike get in too? Remember that infamous story?
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:36 am to lsusa
quote:
Dale Murphy
Doesn't have the numbers. Needed 400 HR's. Couldn't get there.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:37 am to biglego
The average Jeff Kent season over 17 years was .290 BA, .356 OBP, .500 SA, 22 HR, 89 RBI, 78 runs scored. He was not chopped liver. Only about 100 or so people in the 150-year-plus history of MLB have slugged .500 for that length of a career. I can justify putting him in, I just think others should go in ahead of him.
I would vote for Murph or Mattingly but what’s killing them with the committee voters is they had relatively short peaks before injuries … Murph’s knees, Mattingly’s back … ruined them as Hall of Fame level players. But both of them hung around for six more years, Mattingly as an average player and Murph as a below average player.
I would vote for Murph or Mattingly but what’s killing them with the committee voters is they had relatively short peaks before injuries … Murph’s knees, Mattingly’s back … ruined them as Hall of Fame level players. But both of them hung around for six more years, Mattingly as an average player and Murph as a below average player.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:41 am to biglego
quote:
I never once saw Jeff Kent and thought “that’s a hall of famer right there”
Agree with this - always had him in the "Hall of Pretty Good"
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:46 am to TheJunction
I never cared for Kent because he was an arse, but did you know he had a higher career slugging average than Reggie Jackson? (And higher than Murph or Mattingly and a boatload of other major names already in the HoF.)
Y’all are acting like they put Biff Pocoroba in. I have no problem with Kent being in, I just think some other guys should be in ahead of him.
Y’all are acting like they put Biff Pocoroba in. I have no problem with Kent being in, I just think some other guys should be in ahead of him.
This post was edited on 12/8/25 at 8:54 am
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:51 am to InkStainedWretch
I honestly haven't looked at his stats, or the analytics - just never thought he was a HOF when he played, doesn't mean he shouldn't be in though.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:57 am to biglego
quote:
I never once saw Jeff Kent and thought “that’s a hall of famer right there”
But Mattingly and Murphy, I assumed both were already in
As a kid who grew up in their eras this statement is 100% correct. The MLB hall of fame has about 10 players from the juiced era and Pete Rose that deserve to be in WAY WAY before even mentioning the name Jeff Kent.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 8:58 am to TheJunction
There was a stretch of nine years in his career where Kent had over 100 RBIs eight times, topping 120 RBIs three times, and the year he missed 100 he was at 93.
Honestly I probably didn’t think he was a Hall of Famer when I was watching him in real time, either, but those are clear Hall of Fame numbers. I just think Lou Whitaker should have gone in before him at 2B.
Honestly I probably didn’t think he was a Hall of Famer when I was watching him in real time, either, but those are clear Hall of Fame numbers. I just think Lou Whitaker should have gone in before him at 2B.
This post was edited on 12/8/25 at 8:59 am
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:01 am to InkStainedWretch
Jeff Kent is the all-time HR and RBI leader for a primary second baseman. Pretty obvious HOFer, on his own merit.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:32 pm to ronricks
quote:
Doesn't have the numbers. Needed 400 HR's. Couldn't get there.
Which is absolutely stupid to set an arbitrary statistical plateau.
But my main point was that since Bonds and Clemens, who certainly have “the numbers” are excluded because they played the game “dirty”, Murphy’s being “clean” should equally be in his favor.
Guy was a two-time NL MVP and one of the most recognizable players of his era.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:52 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
Jeff Kent is the all-time HR and RBI leader for a primary second baseman.
Except he’s really a third baseman with a shite arm they threw out there at 2nd to try to hide. He shouldn’t get rewarded for having a weak arm.
And he had the luxury of hitting either right in front of or behind the greatest offensive player in the history of the sport for the best part of his career. You can’t logically have Bonds out and put Kent in who benefited from the same “cheating,” just indirectly,
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:54 pm to Hot Carl
Well Bonds being out is the real travesty, not Kent being in.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:32 pm to ronricks
Dale Murphy won back to back NL Mvps. Was elite in the 80s. Was second only to Mike Schmidt for the most homers in the 80s. His knee problems ruined the back end of his career. He deserves to be in the hall of fame. Ended with 398 homers. Can't get much closer to your imaginary 400 homer threshold than that.
Back to top
3







