Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

This is what Trump should nail Slotkin with:

Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:48 pm
Posted by Chip82
Athens, Georgia
Member since Jan 2023
1630 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:48 pm
U.S. Codes
Chapter 439

TITLE I
Secti on 1. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, with intent to
interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline
of the military or naval forces of the United States—
(1) to advise, counsel, urge, or in any manner cause insubordina-
tion, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the
military or naval forces of the United States; or
(2) to distribute any written or printed matter which advises,
counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of
duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United
States.
(b) For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval
forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States,
as defined in section 1 of the National Defense Act of June 3, 1916,
as amended (48 Stat. 153; U. S. C., title 10, sec. 2), the Navy, Marine
Corps, Coast Guard, Naval Reserve, and Marine Corps Reserve of the
United States; and, when any merchant vessel is commissioned in the
Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master,
officers, and crew of such vessel.
Sec . 5. (a) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this
title shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $10,000 or
imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both.


Loyalty and Morale should be the main focus.

There are plenty of servicemen who would gladly testify about being negatively influenced...

Convict them and put them behind bars for a year along with nine years of probation.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 6:29 pm
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
13180 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:51 pm to
Slotkin's response to Trump's post was actually craftily measured... I think Kelley and the other dude might have talked themselves into a corner though with their "clap backs".

Slotkin is worrisome. She's the smart one in that bunch. The dudes are retards.
Posted by whereishobson
Member since Dec 2012
377 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:53 pm to
Thank you for doing the leg work ;)
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8637 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:59 pm to
There should be a federal crime for being fugly and stupid.
Posted by Chip82
Athens, Georgia
Member since Jan 2023
1630 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Slotkin is worrisome. She's the smart one in that bunch.



She is Jewish

This new version of the Democrat Party passed on Shapiro for VP..

She has a limited ceiling as well.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464606 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

There are plenty of servicemen who would gladly testify about being negatively influenced...


By being reminded to follow the law and Constitution?

Unpack that for me
Posted by theballguy
Bama Park
Member since Oct 2011
28307 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:17 am to
Make it happen. No excuses.
Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
787 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:24 am to
quote:

By being reminded to follow the law and Constitution?



From the same party that routinely dismisses the 2A as if it doesn't exist? How's that for "following the Constitution'? Unpack that, Counselor.

I have said it before, and I'll say it again...maybe one day you'll wake up and realize why you receive the amount of scorn you get on here. Or maybe you just do this for fun.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17126 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:25 am to
I do know Speaker Johnson specifically stated the DOJ and Pentagon were looking into the matter. That particular statute noted above is spot on and must be used to stop this going forward.

Arrest them all now and give each of them the maximum sentence. Only then will such dialogue end.
Posted by Chip82
Athens, Georgia
Member since Jan 2023
1630 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:50 am to
quote:

follow the law


By using the word, "illegal," without providing any concrete example, they have established confusion, uncertainty and an overall negative reaction.

Their intent is to negatively impact both morale and loyalty. (This establishes probable cause based on the wording of the statute)

Any honest judge would find, "standing" according to the wording of the statute.

You, of course, are just pretending that this is a legitimate concern for the men and women in uniform.

Most see through this as being a purely political gimmick.

You know darn well know that these Democrat politicians don't give a rat's arse about the military honor code over their own political agendas.





This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 8:52 am
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
7796 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:03 am to
quote:

By being reminded to follow the law and Constitution?

Unpack that for me


You are not that fricking stupid.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8733 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:35 am to
quote:


Slotkin's response to Trump's post was actually craftily measured... I think Kelley and the other dude might have talked themselves into a corner though with their "clap backs".

Slotkin is worrisome. She's the smart one in that bunch. The dudes are retards.


She's career CIA.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8733 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:36 am to
quote:


quote:
There are plenty of servicemen who would gladly testify about being negatively influenced...


By being reminded to follow the law and Constitution?

Unpack that for me



When she implies that everything the CIC is doing is "illegal," then yeah. It's a fricking problem. You know this but your TDS clouds your judgement. Nerd.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8733 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:37 am to
quote:


quote:
By being reminded to follow the law and Constitution?

Unpack that for me


You are not that fricking stupid.



Yes. He is. TDS broke him.
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2090 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:44 am to
Kelly and the other guy are both retired military, which means they are still subjected to the UCMJ. Both can get court martials for statements they have made just in that video. The fact they put Army and U.S. Navy in their titles while making those statements are a huge no-no.
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2628 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:52 am to
quote:

By being reminded to follow the law and Constitution?


They aren’t now?
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17126 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:56 am to
POTUS Trump should respond with:

We need to alert the aides and employees of Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) - Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.)
- Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) - Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.) - Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) - Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.):

Congressional aids shall NOT follow the orders of any elected Congress person if they feel those orders are unethical, illegal or differ with their 'understanding' of the Constitution.

That's especially true of the orders of Sen Elissa Slotkin as she's considered usually unstable even by democrat standards.

Remember congressional aides - YOU make the call on what 'orders' these congress people give you. IF it doesn't 'feel' right or differs with YOUR interpretation of the Constitution - don't do what they ask.


Posted by newmexicotiger
Member since Sep 2017
4020 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:57 am to
By being reminded to follow the law and Constitution?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram